<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GH</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Geographica Helvetica</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GH</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geogr. Helv.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2194-8798</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gh-74-125-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Glacial lake outburst flood hazard assessment by satellite Earth observation
in the Himalayas<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> (Chomolhari area, Bhutan)</article-title><alt-title>Glacial lake outburst flood hazard assessment by satellite Earth observation</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Glacial lake outburst flood hazard assessment by satellite Earth observation}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{C. Scapozza et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Scapozza</surname><given-names>Cristian</given-names></name>
          <email>cristian.scapozza@supsi.ch</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9003-7864</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ambrosi</surname><given-names>Christian</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Cannata</surname><given-names>Massimiliano</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2527-1416</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Strozzi</surname><given-names>Tazio</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9054-951X</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts
of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), Campus Trevano, 6952 Canobbio, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Gamma Remote Sensing, Worbstrasse 225, 3073 Gümligen, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Cristian Scapozza (cristian.scapozza@supsi.ch)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>28</day><month>March</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>74</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>125</fpage><lpage>139</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>23</day><month>April</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26</day><month>February</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>14</day><month>March</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 Cristian Scapozza et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://gh.copernicus.org/articles/74/125/2019/gh-74-125-2019.html">This article is available from https://gh.copernicus.org/articles/74/125/2019/gh-74-125-2019.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://gh.copernicus.org/articles/74/125/2019/gh-74-125-2019.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gh.copernicus.org/articles/74/125/2019/gh-74-125-2019.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e112">A case study of glacial lakes outburst flood (GLOF) hazard
assessment by satellite Earth observation (EO) and numerical modelling is
presented for the supraglacial and ice-contact lakes on Thangothang Chhu
glacier, Chomolhari area (Bhutan). Detailed geomorphological mapping,
including landslide and rock glacier inventories, as well as surface
displacement determination using an interferometric SAR (InSAR) satellite,
allowed a GLOF hazard assessment for lake Wa-007 to be performed. Outburst
scenario modelling was achieved by combining both empirical and numerical
modelling approaches, revealing that only a flood wave can have an impact on
the two human settlements located downslope of Wa-007 lake. The worst-case
scenario, modelled thanks to r.damflood, allowed the wave-front
arrival time, the maximum water depth and the arrival time of maximum water
height for the two human settlements to be quantified. A long-term monitoring strategy based
entirely on EO data, with an update cycle of 5 years, is proposed to assess
the future evolution of the area.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e124">Thanks to satellite Earth observation (EO), hazard assessments of glacial
lake outburst floods (GLOFs) were performed in several mountain chains of the
world, including the Alps (e.g. Haeberli, 1983; Huggel et al., 2004;
Haeberli et al., 2001), the Andes (e.g. Schneider et al., 2014; Schaub et
al., 2015; Frey et al., 2016) and the Himalayas (e.g. Budhathoki et al.,
2010; Haemmig et al., 2014) in the last years. Due to its extension,
importance in the south-Asiatic geopolitical context and natural
sensitivity to climate change, the Himalayas were recently of great interest
in research projects related to landslide- (e.g. Ambrosi et al., 2018) and
glacier-related (e.g. Allen et al., 2016) hazard assessments, including
morphological studies trying to quantify future lake formation by
glacier melting (e.g. Schaub et al., 2013; Linsbauer et al., 2016) or
quantify permafrost degradation (e.g. Gruber et al., 2017). In this
framework, the GLOF hazard assessment is to be considered to be a part of the
general topic concerning the connection between high-mountain hazards and
climate change (e.g. GAPHAZ, 2017), which integrates the impact of
permafrost degradation on the stability of rock slopes above glaciers (e.g.
Gruber and Haeberli, 2007; Krautblatter et al., 2013) or the increasing
hazard related to ice-rock avalanches falling into new lakes from icy peaks with
degrading permafrost (e.g. Salzmann et al., 2004; Haeberli et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e127">This paper presents a GLOF hazard assessment for the supraglacial lake
Wa-007 on the Thangothang Chhu glacier, Chomolhari area in the Bhutan Himalayas.
This assessment was carried out in the framework of a European Space Agency–World Bank
(ESA–WB) collaboration project on satellite EO in the
Himalayas, where landslides, floods and GLOF hazard assessments were
performed in Nepal and Bhutan (Sauerbier et al., 2015a; Scapozza, 2015;
Ambrosi et al., 2018). Within this framework, the GLOF hazard assessment has
made it possible to combine observations from flood and landslide hazard
mapping, as well as to valorise the products derived from land use and land
cover mapping and from the generation of high-resolution digital-elevation
models (DEMs).</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page126?><sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Study area</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Site description</title>
      <p id="d1e145">The Chomolhari area is located in north-western Bhutan, in the Thimphu
District (Thimphu is also the capital of Bhutan and the largest city of the
state) and a few kilometres north of the village of Jangothang (Fig. 1).
Chomolhari (7326 m a.s.l., also known as Jomolhari or Chomo Lhari) is the
second highest peak in Bhutan, lying on the western border with Tibet.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e150">Google Earth image with the Glacial Lake Inventory of Bhutan using
ALOS (Daichi) data (light blue) (GLIB, 2000). The supraglacial lake object
of this assessment report is Wa-007.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gh.copernicus.org/articles/74/125/2019/gh-74-125-2019-f01.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e159">According to the climate diagram based on 30 years of hourly weather model
simulations on the Chomolhari area and calculated for the 4156 m a.s.l. of
Jantogang Camp (Meteoblue, 2018), the sum of annual precipitation is 317 mm.
Minimum temperatures during cold nights can reach <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in
January, whereas maximum temperatures during hot days can reach
17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in summer. Mean daily minimum temperature is between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in January and 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in July (mean annual value of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and mean daily maximum temperatures is between
0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in January and February and 14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in summer (mean
annual value of 7.75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). Mean annual air temperature (MAAT) is then
1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Considering a mean rate lapse of
0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C 100 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C MAAT is located at about 4420 m a.s.l. As a
rough estimation from Google Earth images, the equilibrium line altitude (ELA)
on glaciers is at about 5500–5700 m a.s.l. for south and south-east
expositions; this corresponds to a MAAT at the ELA of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Concerning the permafrost distribution, Gruber (2012)
tried to derivate a high-resolution estimation of permafrost zonation,
whereas Gruber et al. (2017) reviewed the importance of permafrost
degradation in the Hindu Kush region of Himalayas.</p>
      <p id="d1e336">The glacial lake object of this assessment report, <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>Wa-007<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> according to
the glacial and glacial lake inventory of Bhutan (GLIB, 2000), is located in the frontal part of the 8.5 km long
debris-covered glacier that originated from the glacial basin located on the
south-western part of Jichu Drake peak (6790 m a.s.l.). This glacier will
be named Thangothang Chhu glacier, according to the river generated at this
front (RGI Consortium, 2017). The Wa-007 lake lies directly on the
Thangothang Chuu debris-covered glacier and can be considered as a
supraglacial lake. Several other small supraglacial lakes are present on the
Thangothang Chhu glacier (the second biggest lake is Wa-006), as shown in
Figs. 1 and 2. Two other important ice-contact lakes are present on the
northern side of the glacier, outside of its historical moraine ridges (lakes
Wa-008 and Wa-009).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e345">TerraSAR-X backscattering intensity image of 2 June 2014 showing
many supraglacial ponds in black. The names of the lakes are according to
GLIB (2000).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gh.copernicus.org/articles/74/125/2019/gh-74-125-2019-f02.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e354">The main settlements present on the valley starting from the Chomolhari area
is the town of Paro (ca. 20 000 inhabitants), located about 50 km
from the Thangothang Chhu glacier tongue. Closest to the glacier lake area,
only two settlements are present. Jantogang Camp (4150 m a.s.l.) is located
at 2.5 km and the village of Jangothang (4000 m a.s.l.) at 4.2 km downslope of the
Wa-007 lake. No other human settlements are present downslope of Jangothang
for more than 20 km. Jantogang Camp is the base camp for hiking and climbing
in the Bhutan part of Chomolhari area and is composed of three sparse
permanent buildings (visible in Google Earth) and by a variable number of
tents according to the season. The village of Jangothang presents 16
buildings (also visible in Google Earth) located on two fluvial terraces of
the Thangothang Chhu River and several livestock fences. Several other very small
hamlets and isolated buildings are located on the valley floor up to 4 km
downslope of the main settlement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Historical events</title>
      <p id="d1e365">On the glaciological mapping in 1962 by Reynolds (2000), the two
main ice-contact lakes (Wa-008 and Wa-009) were already present, whereas the
supraglacial lake Wa-007 on the terminal part of the Thangothang Chhu glacier
was absent. In contrast to other Bhutan glacial lakes (see<?pagebreak page127?> Richardson and
Reynolds, 2000; Nayar, 2009), there is no historical information about past
events on the Thangothang Chhu glacier. In the scientific literature, the
surface gradients of this glacier were analysed by Reynolds (2000) to explain
the formation of supraglacial lakes on debris-covered glaciers, resulting
from the stagnation of very slow-moving ice (negative mass balance) with surface
gradients lower than 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and highlighting the supraglacial lake
formation since 1966.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Material and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Satellite EO mapping</title>
      <p id="d1e393">Detailed geomorphological mapping took place by combining three EO base
maps and considering the pros and cons of every product. Direct mapping of
geomorphological units was done on a VHRO KOMPSAT-2 orthophoto from
27 November 2010, with a ground resolution of 2 m. Shape reconnaissance was
improved thanks to hillshades of TanDEM-X DEM, with absolute and relative
vertical accuracies of 5 and 2 m (Ambrosi et al., 2018). The joint use of
orthophotos and hillshaded DEMs for geomorphological mapping, as well as the
differentiation of slope, slope foot, glacial, glaciofluvial and periglacial
landforms and deposits, was done according to the recommendations of
Ambrosi and Scapozza (2015). Google Earth images were used as ancillary
information for supporting the direct mapping and for the interpretation of
the lake level fluctuations.</p>
      <p id="d1e396">Satellite interferometric SAR (InSAR) – using both differential interferometric SAR
(DInSAR, e.g. Bamler and Hartl, 1998) and persistent
scatterer interferometry (PSI, e.g. Ferretti et al., 2001) – was used to
assess the surface displacements. DInSAR has been applied to stacks of
TerraSAR-X (Fig. 2), Sentinel-1, ERS-1/2 SAR, ENVISAT ASAR, ALOS-1 PALSAR-1
and Radarsat-2 images acquired between 1998 and 2015 from ascending and
descending orbits. PSI analysis was conducted only with the stacks of
ENVISAT ASAR images of the descending orbit and of ALOS-1 PALSAR-1 images of
the ascending orbit, because for the other image stacks the number of
acquisitions was not sufficient for this kind of processing. For details
about satellite SAR acquisitions, processing and interpretation please refer
to Ambrosi et al. (2018). The complete set of images and data available for
GLOF hazard assessment in the Chomolhari area is listed in Table 1.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e402">Data available for this hazard assessment of the Chomolhari area
processed within this study and additional sources.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{0.93}[0.93]?><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="48.369685pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="85.358268pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="139.418504pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="91.048819pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="113.811024pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Type</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Source</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Specifications and date</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Additional sources</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Estimated uncertainties</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DEM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">TanDEM-X</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Acquired 15 December 2012<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(desc.) and 19 March 2013<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(asc.),  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.33333</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m) resolution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ASTER GDEM, SRTM<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>1 arcsec</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">TanDEM-X: absolute and<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>relative vertical accuracies<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>are 5 and 2 m.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lake<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>outlines</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">VHRO KOMPSAT-2<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>TerraSAR-X (2014) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Sentinel-1 (2015) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>ERS-1/2 (1998) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>ENVISAT (2005<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>–2009) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>ALOS (2007–2010) <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Radarsat-2 (2014)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">27 November 2010 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2, 13 and 24 June 2014 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>12 December 2014, 5 May 2015 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>19 September 1998 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>20 August 2005, 25 August 2007<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>16 May 2009 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>6 June 2007, 8 June 2008<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>11 October 2009, 14 October 2010,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>4, 28 November 2014<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>22 December 2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">GLIB (2000), using<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>ALOS PRISM and<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>AVNIR-2 data<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(<uri>https://www.eorc.jaxa.jp/ALOS/en/bhutan_gli/</uri>, last access: 12 January 2019), <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Reynolds (2000), <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Google Earth</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">KOMPSAT-2: 2 m <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>TerraSAR-X: 10 m <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Sentinel-1: 20 m <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>ERS-1/2: 20 m <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>ENVISAT: 20 m <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>ALOS: 10 m <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Radarsat-2: 10 m</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Glacier<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>outlines</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">VHRO KOMPSAT-2<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>PALSAR summer<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>coherence image</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">27 November 2010 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>6 July, 6 October 2007</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">RGI Consortium (2017)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">KOMPSAT-2: 2 m <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>PALSAR: 30 m</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ice surface<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>velocity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ALOS <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>TerraSAR-X <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Radarsat-2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6 January, 21 February 2008<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>8 January, 23 February 2009<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>11 January, 23 February 2010 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2, 13 June 2014<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2, 24 June 2014<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>13, 24 June 2014 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>4, 28 November 2014<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>4 November, 22 December 2014<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>28 November, 22 December 2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">ALOS: 10 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>TerraSAR-X: 10 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>  Radarsat-2: 10 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rock glacier inventory<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>map</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Description of processes<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>and activity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Google Earth</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Landslide<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>inventory</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Landslide inventory <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>map   <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Landslide state of<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>activity maps <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>ERS-1/2 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>ENVISAT ASAR <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>ALOS PALSAR <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>TerraSAR-X <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Radarsat-2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Description of involved <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>processes   <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Velocity estimate <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>1992–1998 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2003–2010 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2007–2011 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2014 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Google Earth</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Accuracy: <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>ENVISAT PSI: 1–2 mm a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>ALOS PSI: 6–7 mm a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>InSAR pairs: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase cycle</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Land use/<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>land cover</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Land use/<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>land cover maps</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Spatial distribution of<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>land use and land cover</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Google Earth</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Accuracy: 2 m</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e848">Landslide and rock glacier inventories, comprising degrees of activity,
were created from the joint analysis of detailed geomorphological
mapping and of surface displacement rates quantified from InSAR, as
described in detail by Ambrosi et al. (2018). Ice surface velocities were
computed using offset tracking (Strozzi et al., 2002; Paul et al., 2015).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Hazard assessment</title>
      <p id="d1e860">The GLOF hazard assessment was performed based on the checklist for glacier
lake hazard assessments provided by the ESA's S:GLA:MO project (Frey et al.,
2015). The S:GLA:MO project (Slope Stability and Glacial Lake Monitoring,
<uri>http://sglamo.gamma-rs.ch</uri>, last access: 7 January 2019), funded by ESA and conducted between 2014 and
2015 by Gamma Remote Sensing (Switzerland), the Department of Geography of
the University of Zürich (Switzerland), the Department of Geosciences of
the University of Oslo (Norway) and Asiaq (Greenland) aimed to assess
the hazard potential of glacial lakes based on EO data and products, in situ
data and flow modelling. An integrated assessment of hazards related to
glacial lakes was
developed that address the widely acknowledged dependencies, integrated
detection, monitoring and modelling of glacial lakes together with
detection, monitoring and modelling of slope instabilities and glacier
conditions and behaviour that potentially affect the glacial lakes. In order to provide a reproducible and transparent hazard
assessment, the generic checklist-like structure was followed, according to
which the analyses were conducted for the specific study case.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Potential outburst scenarios modelling</title>
      <?pagebreak page128?><p id="d1e874">Two kinds of models were applied to the potential outburst
scenario defined on the basis of the hazard assessment. The first one is
based on empirical relationships proposed by Huggel et al. (2002, 2004) and Huggel (2004). Because the equation for lake volume
quantification as proposed by Huggel et al. (2002: 31) and Huggel et al. (2004: 1069) is based on self-correlation relating the mathematical products
between lake area and lake depth and the factor (the lake area) from which
this product had been calculated, here we made a lake volume estimation
[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>] based on the mean depth [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>], which was determined as follows starting from
the lake surface [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>] (Huggel et al., 2002: 319):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M32" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.104</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.42</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          In the case of ice-dammed lakes, the probable maximum discharge [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] is a
function of the volume [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>]. Regarding subglacial drainage of ice-dammed
lakes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be calculated as follows (Huggel et al., 2004: 1071):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M36" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">46</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.66</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The maximum discharge [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] for a worst-case scenario, related to
the ice dam suddenly breaking, is calculated by assuming mean drainage duration
[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>] of 1000 s for maximum estimates as proposed in Haeberli's (1983)
empirical relationship (Huggel et al., 2004: 1071).
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M39" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          According to Huggel et al. (2002: 322), the lake volume can be doubled in the
case of outbursts from moraine-dammed lakes:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M40" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Finally, the minimum average slope for debris flows from lake outbursts
[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>], which conditioned the probable maximum travel distance of the
debris flow, is a function of the maximum discharge [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] (Huggel,
2004: 35):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M43" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The second model adopted here is based on numerical modelling using a
two-dimensional dam break flooding simulation and applying a GIS-embedded
approach. Here we applied the numerical model r.damflood, a GRASS GIS-integrated two-dimensional dam break model that solves the conservative form
of the 2-D shallow water equations using a finite volume method
(Cannata and Marzocchi, 2012). The intercell flux is computed by a one-sided
upwind conservative scheme extended to a two-dimensional problem. Data used
for the simulation include the DEM, reclassified land use to assign
Manning's friction coefficient values and a dam-breach map indicating the
depth of the dam after collapse (Table 2).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1091">Input and output parameters of r.damflood model for estimating the
area potentially inundated in case of a dam break. For more detail, see
<uri>https://grass.osgeo.org/grass74/manuals/addons/r.damflood.html</uri> (last access:
19 December 2018).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Section </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Remarks</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3"><bold>(a)</bold> Options </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">a.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Flow direction additional output flag</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Aspect of TanDEM-X DEM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">a.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Computational method</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Dam break without hypothesis</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">a.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Computational time step</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0,001 s</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3"><bold>(b)</bold> Input options </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">b.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Elevation raster map (accounting for reservoir's bathymetry and dam elevation)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TanDEM-X DEM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">b.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Lake water depth raster map (easily obtained with r.lake GRASS GIS module)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">From empirical relationships</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">b.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Dam breach width raster map (decreased dam height due to failure)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">From empirical relationships</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">b.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Manning's roughness coefficient raster map</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Land cover raster map</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">b.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Simulation time duration</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7200 s [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">120</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3"><bold>(c)</bold> Output options </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">c.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Time lag for outputs generation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30 s</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">c.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Additional instants for output map generation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Raster map</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">c.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Prefix for water depth output raster maps</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Raster map</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">c.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Prefix for water velocity output raster maps</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Raster map</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">c.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Maximum water depth output raster maps</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Raster map</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">c.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">maximum water velocity output raster maps</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Raster map</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">c.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Maximum intensity output raster maps</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Raster map</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page129?><sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Satellite EO mapping</title>
      <p id="d1e1356">Detailed geomorphological mapping is reported in Fig. 3. The areal extent
data of the four main glacial lakes on and around the Thangothang Chuu
glacier, derived from this mapping, are reported in Table 3. The slightly
different values reported on the GLIB (2000) and our own mapping indicate a
growth or shrinkage of the lakes between 2000 and 2010. The surface increase of
lake Wa-007 is limited (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and rather negligible for Wa-006
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), whereas it was very important for Wa-008 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). In
only one case are we in the presence of lake shrinkage, with a decrease of
8.4 % for the Wa-009 lake surface.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1392">Surface of the four main glacial lakes of the Thangothang Chhu
glacier.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Glacial</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Type</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Elevation<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">Surface (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Surface</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Estimated</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">lake</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m a.s.l.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">According to</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">This work (surface on</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">variation (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">MAAT (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">GLIB (2000)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">27 November 2010)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wa-007</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Supraglacial lake</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4330</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">88 779</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">92 308</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wa-006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Supraglacial lake</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4600</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11 100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11 228</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wa-009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ice-contact lake</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4462</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25 800</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">23 637</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wa-008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ice-contact lake</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4470</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17 700</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">20 589</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e1395"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> From TanDEM-X DEM produced within this project.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1690">Glacial and periglacial landforms of the lower part of the basin
of the Thangothang Chhu glacier. An active rock glacier is also present on
the slope above lake Wa-009, but it is outside the frame of the image. Base
map: VHRO KOMPSAT-2 orthophoto from 27 November 2010.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gh.copernicus.org/articles/74/125/2019/gh-74-125-2019-f03.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1700">The Wa-007 lake does not present evidence of important fluctuations of the
water level, for example terraces and erosion scars in the freeboard. A
visual comparison between five satellite images taken between 2006 and 2014
and visualized in Google Earth (Fig. 4) allowed the lake levels to be
estimated on the basis of the width of the small island present in the south-western
part of the lake. The island's extent was the largest on the oldest image
(14 February 2006), indicating a low lake level rising until 2009 and 2010 (the
two dates with the smallest island widths). In recent times, the lake level
was the lowest in the observation period on January 2014 (largest
measurement of the island width), reaching a width comparable to 2009
and 2010 in December 2014. It is nevertheless too simplistic to interpret
such data as an increase in water level between 2006 and 2010, a decrease
until the beginning of 2014 and a new increase. Considering the season of
each analysed image, it is probable that the lower lake level in January and
February compared to November and December is due to the lower specific
runoff in consideration of the typical discharge regime of Himalayan glacier
catchments (e.g.<?pagebreak page130?> Thayyen and Gergan, 2010). We can thus conclude that the
lake level does not present important fluctuations so far.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1705">Google Earth images of the small island on the south-western part
of the Wa-007 supraglacial lake (location of the white rectangle), used for
a qualitative assessment of the lake level fluctuations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gh.copernicus.org/articles/74/125/2019/gh-74-125-2019-f04.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1714">As Wa-007 is a supraglacial lake, it is directly influenced by glacier
dynamics. According to the TerraSAR-X images of 2 and 13 June 2014 (Fig. 5)
and the ALOS PSI analysis (Fig. 6a), glacier velocities close to the lake
are very low. This indicates a stagnant glacier, also explaining the very
important cover in debris, which is the consequence of a positive balance between the
accumulation of debris on the glacier surface and their evacuation by ice
flow. Only the very steep upper part of the glacier moves with
velocities larger than 100 m a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Calving processes on the lake are possible,
as shown by floating ice blocks on the 20 December 2014 image reported in Fig. 4.
The detachment of small pieces of ice is also visible by the presence of
several gullies on the ice-debris scarp dominating the northern side of the
lake.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1731">Horizontal ice surface velocity determined from TerraSAR-X images
of 2 to 13 June 2014. Image background is a shaded relief of the DEM.
Glacier boundaries (yellow) from RGI Consortium (2017). Lake boundaries
(blue) from GLIB (2000).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gh.copernicus.org/articles/74/125/2019/gh-74-125-2019-f05.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e1743">SAR interferometry of the debris-covered glacier tongue. <bold>(a)</bold> ALOS
PSI between 18 February 2007 and 1 February 2011. Within the red circle the lack of
points indicates that velocities might be higher than a few cm a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
<bold>(b)</bold> Radarsat-2 InSAR between 4 and 28 November 2014 (24 days). The signal is
coherent, indicating a quite uniform movement with a rate between 10 and 50 cm a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gh.copernicus.org/articles/74/125/2019/gh-74-125-2019-f06.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1782">The dam of the supraglacial lake Wa-007 is composed of the debris-covered
glacier itself: we can then consider it to be an ice dam. Just downstream of
the glacier front, several moraine ridges are present (Fig. 3). In case of
failure of the ice dam, these ridges can act as moraine dams because of their minimum altitude
above lake level. Considering the kinematics of the
glacier front, analysed by DInSAR from ALOS PSI and Radarsat-2 images, the
ice dam of lake Wa-007 is not stable and presents movements of several
decimetres per year on the right side of the glacier (Fig. 6). The freeboard
is between 2 and 5 m depending on the location. As the lake is not
located directly close to the front of the debris-covered glacier, the
width-to-height ratio of the dam is not critical. Considering that no
morphological signs of surficial runoff from the lake are present (e.g.
gullies), the freeboard is probably still sufficient to contain impact waves
generated from ice falls. This is exclusively a morphological
interpretation, because a numerical modelling of the possible run-up height
of an impact wave (e.g. Schaub et al., 2015) has not been carried out. The
lack of morphological signs also indicates that a surface outlet of the lake
does not exist. Even in the absence of indications of percolation through the
dam, it is probable that a percolation of water is
present within the debris-covered
glacier or, at least, at the contact between ice and the debris cover. As a consequence, the possibility of a sudden drainage of the lake
through the probably polythermal glacier should be considered.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1788">Topographical characteristics and magnitude of velocity of the rock
glaciers located on the lower part of the Thangothang Chhu glacier basin.
Name refers to the landforms mapped in Fig. 3.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Name</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Degree of</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Evidence of activity</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Exposition</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Front altitude</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Area</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Estimated</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">activity</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(magnitude of velocity)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(m a.s.l.)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">MAAT (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TC-01</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">active</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0–2 cm a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> by InSAR</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SE</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4680</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">56 747</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TC-02</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">inactive</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">No evidence of activity,</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4" morerows="1">E</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5" morerows="1">4660</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6" morerows="1">35 029</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7" morerows="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">but morphologically intact</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TC-03</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">active</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0–2 cm a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> by InSAR</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">E</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4560</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">93 744</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TC-04</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">active</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0–2 cm a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> by InSAR</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">E</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4660</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">66 702</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TC-05</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">relict</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">No evidence of activity</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4" morerows="1">SE</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5" morerows="1">4380</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6" morerows="1">68 275</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7" morerows="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">and morphologically relict</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">TC-06</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="1">active</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Upper lobe: 10–50 cm a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">E</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">4770</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6" morerows="1">91 202</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Lower lobe: 2–10 cm a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">E</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4850</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TC-07</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">active/</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3" morerows="1">No data</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4" morerows="1">N</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5" morerows="1">4790</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6" morerows="1">6838</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7" morerows="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">inactive</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2224">In the lower part of the Thangothang Chhu glacier basin, eight rock glaciers
were identified and mapped (Fig. 3). An assessment of their state of activity
was performed based on ALOS and Radarsat-2 SAR interferometric analyses,
which revealed significant surface displacements on the slope dominating the
right side of the Thangothang Chhu glacier tongue (Fig. 7). The joint
interpretation of the morphological characteristics and of the magnitude of
movement allowed the differentiations between active (i.e. containing ice and
moving downslope), inactive (i.e. containing ice but not moving) and relict
(without ice) rock glaciers (Table 4), according to the conventional
classification proposed by Barsch (1996). Only the rock glacier TC-05 can be
considered to be a relict. This is located lower in altitude (from 180 to 280 m)
with respect to TC-2, TC-3 and TC-4, which present the same slope exposition.
Rock glacier TC-6 is polymorphic sensu stricto (Frauenfelder and
Kääb, 2000). The presence of two superimposed lobes is also visible in the
kinematics of this complex landform, with the upper lobe that presents a
magnitude of velocity higher than the lower one (Table 4). Estimated MAAT at
the front of active or inactive rock glaciers is between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, whereas for the only relict rock glacier it is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Table 3). Considering that the front altitude of the lowest
active rock glaciers in a region allows for an estimation of the lower limit of
discontinuous permafrost in loose debris (e.g. Barsch, 1996; Frauenfelder and
Kääb, 2000; Boeckli et al., 2012), the presence of permafrost is
probable above an altitude of 4600–4700 m a.s.l., corresponding to a MAAT
of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The occurrence of active rock glaciers on the right side of the
Wa-007 lake indicates a certain presence of permafrost in the catchment of
the lake. Considering that the mapped rock glaciers are mainly exposed to the
E and SE, and in accordance with the high-resolution permafrost zonation carried
out by Gruber (2012), it is probable that the permafrost lower limit on
north-exposed slopes may reach lower altitudes.</p>
      <?pagebreak page131?><p id="d1e2305">Except for Wa-006, all the lakes are located below 4600 m a.s.l.; therefore,
according to the climate parameters presented above, MAAT at their elevation
is between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Table 3). As a
consequence, for the two ice-contact lakes partially dammed by moraine ridges
(Wa-008 and Wa-009), the presence of permafrost on their dams is improbable.
Despite this, it is nevertheless important to consider that the
presence of dead ice, as well as the presence of very sporadic local
permafrost conditions, is also possible several hundreds of metres below the
lower limit of discontinuous permafrost.</p>
      <p id="d1e2338">Regarding unstable terrains identified upstream of the glacier lake, several
landslides and rockfall deposits were mapped (Fig. 8). The state of activity
of the mapped phenomena was evaluated from SAR interferometric data.<?pagebreak page132?> A
certain number of active soil slides affect in particular both lateral
moraine ridges. Small rock slides are also present on the slopes above the
glacier tongue. The movements of these slides are in all the cases of the
order of magnitude of 1 cm a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and cannot influence the stability of the
Wa-007 lake. Small volumes of fractured rock mass were mapped in the area
upstream of the glacier. These mapped volumes could evolve as rockfall but,
in any case, they cannot influence the stability of the lake. In addition,
areas of active erosion and areas affected by diffuse shallow landslides
were recognized on the left slope above the glacier. Considering their
limited volume and the phenomena restricted to the shallow surface, they do
not represent a hazard factor for the stability of the lake.</p>
      <p id="d1e2353">The region of the lake itself is not directly exposed to eventual ice-rock
avalanches related to hanging glaciers. These kinds of glaciers are, however,
present in the upper part of the Thangothang Chhu glacier, with very steep
slopes between 4800 and 6000 m a.s.l. and the fastest glacier
velocities (Fig. 5). They can have an indirect effect on the Wa-007 lake
in the case of major ice-rock avalanches related to the collapse of the main
exposed part of these hanging glaciers (sectors with a pervasive presence of
crevasses mapped in Fig. 8 as potential detachment zones of an ice
avalanche), by causing a potential surge of the glacier related to a wave
effect produced by the increase in load on the accumulation zone caused by
the collapse of a hanging glacier (e.g. Gardner and Hewitt, 1990). However,
as the lake is located at the middle of the glacier tongue, separated from
the valley slopes by significant morainic ridges (Fig. 3), it is not
directly subject to potential avalanches or rockfall trajectories. The
presence of important moraine ridges provides a kind of natural protection
from mass movement impacts from the lateral slopes for lakes Wa-006 and
Wa-007 (but not for Wa-008 and Wa-009). The impact of ice-rock avalanches
can, however, be important for lakes Wa-008 and Wa-009, located outside of the
left lateral moraine ridge. Due to their position, these two lakes have a
relatively high chance of being impacted by ice-rock avalanches. Deposits
probably related to ice-rock avalanches are present in contact with these
two lakes at the base of the slope.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2358">SAR interferometry of the slope dominating the Wa-007 supraglacial
lake. <bold>(a)</bold> ALOS PSI between 18 February 2007 and 1 February 2011, with red points
indicating velocities higher than 1 cm a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(b)</bold> Radarsat-2 InSAR between
4 and 28 November 2014 (24 days). Unfilled ovals represent the
magnitude of velocity for selected rock glaciers.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gh.copernicus.org/articles/74/125/2019/gh-74-125-2019-f07.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e2387">Google Earth image reporting a detailed inventory of landslides
and other potential unstable areas present in the catchment of the Wa-007
lake excluding rock glaciers.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gh.copernicus.org/articles/74/125/2019/gh-74-125-2019-f08.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Hazard consideration</title>
      <p id="d1e2404">Three other supraglacial lakes and two ice-contact lakes, not directly
linked with the Wa-007 supraglacial lake, are present in the lower part of
the Thangothang Chhu glacier catchment. The other supraglacial lakes are not
sufficiently large to cause a GLOF and a subsequent debris flow impacting
directly on the Wa-007 lake (the larger one is Wa-006, with a surface of
11 100 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). However, lake Wa-006 in particular can be a potential source
of hazard for the Wa-007 supraglacial lake because, if it drains within the
glacier, this could lead to a very rapid increase in the lake volume at
Wa-007 and cause drainage of this lake. The two ice-contact lakes present a
larger surface (17 700 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for Wa-008 and 25 800 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for<?pagebreak page133?> Wa-009),
but an eventual debris flow related to a GLOF starting from these two lakes
will be channelized between the left side of the valley and the left lateral
moraine of the Thangothang Chhu glacier and not attend the Wa-007
supraglacial lake.</p>
      <p id="d1e2434">Considering the results of geomorphological mapping, the probability of
(i) an ice-rock avalanche directly impacting the lake, (ii) large debris
flows caused by GLOF related to the other glacial lakes located upstream,
(iii) the presence of rapid landslides directly impacting the lake or
(iv) very large lake fluctuations, appears to be low. As the flow velocities
of the glacier around the lake are close to zero, a blockage of the
subglacial drainage causing a rapid increase in the water level by intense
precipitation or ice and snow melt is improbable. The main probable lake
outburst trigger is related to the thinning of the ice dam related to
important glacier retreat in the next years or decennia (significant ablation at
the glacier front).</p>
      <p id="d1e2437">Another aspect that must be considered to be an outburst mechanism is a
subglacial drainage by progressive enlargement of the subglacial channels
within the glacier. This is the most common drainage process for
supraglacial lakes, as highlighted for the large supraglacial lake in
2002–2003 on Ghiacciaio del Belvedere above Macugnaga in Italy (Kääb
et al., 2004) and in 2004 on a lake on the Gorner Glacier in the Valais Alps
(Sugiyama et al., 2008). The connection between supraglacial lakes should
not be forgotten. A potential drainage of Wa-006 lake within the glacier,
for example, can lead to a very rapid increase in Wa-007 lake volume and
therefore cause drainage of this lake. As a comparable situation, in June
2015, only about 45 km north-east of the Chomolhari area, a GLOF happened: the drainage of a smaller lake caused an outburst of the lower lake
(Palden, 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e2440">Downstream of the Thangothang Chhu glacier tongue, abundant loose material is
available, first by the presence of several frontal moraines and second by
the presence of a glaciofluvial plain just outside of the historical
moraines. However, considering that the main valley bottom presents an
average slope of ca. 4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and that the critical channel
slope for erosion is about 8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Huggel et al., 2004), it is improbable
that an eventual flood wave can transform into a debris flow. In other words,
material deposition will occur on the first hundreds of metres downslope of the
glacier front. Other lakes are not present downstream of Wa-007 and the
valley bottom is probably sufficiently large (100 to 300 m) to prevent
damming of the main river.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page134?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Potential outburst scenarios modelling</title>
      <p id="d1e2469">Considering the situation during the time of this assessment procedure and
the consequent current hazard evaluation described above, critical
conditions triggering a GLOF from the Wa-007 supraglacial lake are probably not
present. In future, therefore, radical modifications in the Thangothang
Chhu glacier itself (in particular by glacial melting) or in the surrounding
terrain (related to permafrost warming and ground ice thawing and activation
and acceleration of shallow landslides and erosion zones) must to be
considered as realistic. As a consequence, a worst-case scenario considering
a complete rupture of the front of the glacier (ice dam failure) and a
subsequent lake shrinkage was adopted for the modelling.</p>
      <p id="d1e2472">The results of empirical modelling are calculated, starting with a Wa-007 lake
surface of 92 308 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 3). The mean lake depth calculated following
Eq. (1) is 12.7 m. Considering the scatter in regression presented by
Huggel et al. (2002), however, the lake volume was quantified by adopting a mean
lake depth of 15 m. The resulting lake volume calculated by multiplying the lake
area by the mean depth is 1 384 620 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the ice dam it is
necessary to use the hydraulic relationship proposed in Eq. (2). The
probable maximum discharge in the case of subglacial draining of the ice-dammed
lake is 57 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The maximum discharge increase significantly
considering a sudden break of the ice dam; following Eq. (3), it is
1384 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. As a consequence, the minimum average slope for debris flows
from lake outbursts calculated following Eq. (5) is 13.6 and
10.9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> considering the maximum discharge calculated following Eqs. (2) and (3).</p>
      <p id="d1e2545">The results presented above include an extreme uncertainty because based on
regressions providing mean-value statistics (Huggel, 2004). If we assume that
a worst-case scenario must work with extreme values, the volume calculations
are then based on a maximal mean value of lake depth. A very large
uncertainty range is also present for the travel distance determined by the
minimum average slope, which is based on a very large range of maximum
discharge considering the diverse mechanics of breach formation. In the case of
an outburst from moraine-dammed lakes, which is not the case for the Thangothang
Chhu glacier, considering the estimated volume of lake Wa-007, the maximum
discharge might even reach 2769 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, as calculated according
to Eq. (4). The subsequent minimum average slope is 10.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Even
considering the scatter between these values, as the main slope of the valley
floor is ca. 4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the formation of a debris flow is highly
improbable. As the channel slope is lower than 8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, considered to be a
starting value for erosion (Huggel et al., 2004), it is assumed to only be the effect
of a flood wave from the lake outburst.</p>
      <p id="d1e2596">The wave-front arrival time (Figs. 9 and 10), the maximum water height
(Fig. 9) and the arrival time of maximum water height (Fig. 10) were
simulated with the numerical model r.damflood. The results show that the wave
front reaches the Jantogang Camp in less than 1.5 min and the village of
Jangothang ca. 3 min after the dam breach, corresponding to a
maximal flow velocity between 23 and 28 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The maximum
water height is reached at about 2.5 km distance from the lake (Fig. 9) in
ca. 3 min (Fig. 10), corresponding to a mean flow velocity of
13.9 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Considering the lateral narrowing of the valley downslope of
Jangothang, an estimation of about 10 m of water was simulated in that area.
The only two human settlements reached by the simulated flood wave are
Jantogang Camp and the village of Jangothang. In the first case, considering
that Jantogang Camp is located about 5–6 m above the Thangothang Chhu River
bed, the maximum water height modelled is between 0.1 and 1.5 m,
which will reach this settlement less than 3 min after the ice-dam breaching
and with a mean flow velocity higher than 11.7 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. For Jangothang
village, located in correspondence of a widening of the valley bottom, the
maximum modelled water height is between 0.1 m on the upper part
of the settlement and 4.5 m on its lower part, which is located on a fluvial
terrace located only about 2–3 m above the river bed. In this case, the
arrival time of the maximum water height is estimated between 4 and 8 min,
corresponding to a mean flow velocity between 8.8 and
17.5 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e2650">Wave front arrival time and maximum water height simulated with
the r.damflood model for a complete collapse of the ice-dam of supraglacial
lake Wa-007. In the box, a detail of the land cover map. Coordinates are
expressed in WGS 1984 UTM zone 45N.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gh.copernicus.org/articles/74/125/2019/gh-74-125-2019-f09.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e2661">Wave front and maximum water height arrival times simulated with
the r.damflood model for a complete collapse of the ice-dam of supraglacial
lake Wa-007. In the box is a detail of the land cover map. Coordinates are
expressed in WGS 1984 UTM zone 45N.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gh.copernicus.org/articles/74/125/2019/gh-74-125-2019-f10.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><title>Future evolution</title>
      <p id="d1e2687">Considering a surface gradient of less than 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and further lowering
of glacial surfaces indicating a thickness loss observed since the beginning
of the 1960s on the glaciers of the Chomolhari area (Reynolds, 2000), we can
expect a potential increase in area and volume in the Waa-007 lake due to glacier
melting. This will also cause a probable change in the dam, by first modifying
the dam width, and then the ratio between lake depth and ice
thickness (Westoby et al., 2015). This normally determines the floating
equilibrium: the subglacial channels typically start opening when the
floating equilibrium is reached, also modifying the opening and close of
part of the drainage network for meltwater due to modifications in the flow
activity of the glacier (Bælum and Benn, 2011; Westoby et al., 2014).
With an increase in glacier melting, we can also expect an increase in
calving activity on the lake (Sakai et al., 2009).</p>
      <p id="d1e2699">In the accumulation zone of the Thangothang Chhu glacier, several hanging
glaciers may warm in the next years or decennia and then pass from cold-based
conditions to polythermal or even temperate-based conditions (Reynolds,
2000). Thus, their dynamics will accelerate and we can also expect an
increase in the meltwater production (Thayyen and Gergan, 2010). This will
then increase the probability of ice-rock avalanches in the upper part of
the Thangothang Chhu glacier.</p>
      <p id="d1e2702">With a general increase in temperature and a modification in precipitation
regime, we can also expect an evolution of<?pagebreak page135?> the mass movements affecting the
slopes around the lake. Warming and partial thawing of permafrost ice can
have an effect both on shallow landslides and on the flow velocity and
stability of rock glaciers of the area (Daanen et al., 2012). With
increasing water availability, we can expect a reactivation or an
acceleration of shallow landslides and areas of erosion present on the left
valley slope just above the <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>Wa-007<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> lake (Ambrosi et al., 2018), with an
increasing amount of sediment transfer toward the glacier tongue (although
not directly in the lake itself). For rock glaciers, we can also expect a
reactivation of inactive rock glaciers or an acceleration of active ones
with the increasing temperatures of permafrost ice, as evidenced, for
example, in the European Alps (e.g. Kääb et al., 2007; Delaloye et al., 2010;
Scapozza et al., 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e2709">As for the Wa-007 supraglacial lake, the GLOF hazard under current conditions is
low, a long-term monitoring strategy based entirely on EO data is proposed
(Table 5). With an update cycle of 5 years, this monitoring strategy has the
objective of measuring the future developments of the lake to survey the
evolution of glacier morphology and dynamics and to monitor the kinematics
of the mass movements (including rock glaciers) surrounding the lower part
of the Thangothang Chhu glacier catchment. Satellite EO alone will be
normally sufficient for monitoring the evolution of this lake. However, as
drainage variations are very difficult to detect by EO data, measuring the
discharge at the glacier front might be very helpful to detect a
GLOF event related to an increase in subglacial drainage by progressive
enlargement of the subglacial channels within the glacier.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T5" specific-use="star"><label>Table 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2716">Suggested future monitoring strategy for Thangothang Chhu glacier
and supraglacial lake Wa-007, based on an update cycle of 5 years.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="85.358268pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="369.885827pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Data</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Remarks</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">InSAR analysis; <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Landslide inventory; <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Rock glacier inventory</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PSI analysis with both ENVISAT and ALOS together with TerraSAR-X and Radarsat-2 InSAR data gave useful results. Together with geomorphological mapping and geophysical remote sensing investigations, detailed information on the landslides, rock glaciers and hanging glaciers activity could be obtained. A repeated landslide and rock glacier inventory (e.g. using Sentinel-1 and PALSAR-2 data) will help anticipating new developments in due time.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ice surface velocity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Changes in glaciers velocities or surge.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Glacier outlines; <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Lake outlines</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">For documenting and monitoring the lake expansion and glacier retreat. In combination with the InSAR analyses and the landslide/rock glacier inventory, developments of new zones of potentially loose material, exposed by glacier retreat, can be monitored.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hanging glaciers<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>outlines</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">For documenting and monitoring the hanging glaciers morphological evolution. In combination with flow velocities derived from InSAR analyses, this allow a diachronical mapping of potential starting zones for large ice avalanches coming from hanging glaciers.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>Outburst scenario modelling</title>
      <p id="d1e2795">The study was structured methodologically following the workflow proposed by
Huggel (2004) and based on the integration of remote sensing and GIS
modelling for the detection, assessment and detailed analysis of glacial
hazards. Hazard assessment was based on EO mapping, terrain surface
modelling (both for the production of DEMs and land cover maps) and
determination of surface displacements from InSAR, according to the
classical methodology applied for landslide hazard assessment based on EO
data (e.g. Ambrosi et al., 2018 and references therein). Outburst scenarios
were modelled by combining both empirical and numerical modelling,
integrating detailed information from EO<?pagebreak page136?> mapping, such as the dam
characteristics, the loose deposits availability and the main slope
(derived from the TanDEM-X DEM). Empirical model was applied to quantify the
lake volume, the probable maximum discharge and the minimum average slope
for debris flows from lake outbursts. This last parameter, compared with the
effective topographical and morphological context of the Thangothang Chhu
valley, allowed the most plausible scenario for numerical modelling to be
defined. Based on these considerations, a debris-flow formation was thought
to be very improbable in this hazard assessment. As a consequence, the applied
numerical model was chosen only for the simulation of the flood wave from
the lake outburst. This approach is particularly robust because, even if an
empirical model can be perceived as relatively simplistic model, the
geomorphological analysis and the subsequent hazard assessment is based on
the detailed knowledge of the terrain characteristics (even if derived from
EO). As a consequence, the GLOF numerical modelling, even if it is
physically based and integrates the basic hydraulic principles that
describe the mechanics of breach formation, represents only additional
information about the entire process of hazard assessment and not a unique
and unquestionable answer.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e2807">For Wa-007, the largest lake in the Thangothang Chhu glacier catchment, the
likelihood of an outburst flood under the current morphoclimatical
conditions appears to be low. The ice dam is, for the moment, relatively
stable and sufficiently thick to prevent a dam breaching. The lack of
morphological indicators at the surface of the glacier tongue also exclude
lake overflowing because of a significant rise in the lake level, mass movements or
ice collapse impacts on the lake.</p>
      <p id="d1e2810"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Both empirical and numerical models indicate that a GLOF from Wa-007 lake is
potentially dangerous, only when considering a worst-case scenario related to
the complete collapse of the ice dam and then a subsequent almost complete
emptying of the lake. This event is possible only under radical modifications
of the glaciological conditions in the area: important ablation of the
Thangothang Chhu glacier tongue, collapses of hanging glaciers located in the
upper part of the catchment, which can originate large ice or ice-rock
avalanches, or important acceleration and subsequent potential collapse of
the rock glaciers and shallow landslides located directly upslope of the lake
due to permafrost warming and thawing.</p>
      <p id="d1e2814">Model estimates revealed that a flood wave rather than a debris flow can
impact the human settlements located downslope of Wa-007 lake. The formation
of a large debris flow is very improbable because of the low inclination of
the valley bottom. Under the worst-case scenario, the Jantogang Camp will be
attained after less than 1.5 min from the ice dam collapse by a flood with a
maximal water height between 0.1 and 1.5 m, whereas the lower part of the
village of Jangothang will be inundated by a maximum water height of 4.5 m
about 4 to 8 min after the glacial lake outburst. Glacial lakes also exist
in the next valley of the same catchment, but they have not been analysed.
Consequently, this hazard analysis is incomplete for the involved village and
is related exclusively to lake Wa-007.</p>
      <p id="d1e2817">The exclusive application of EO techniques allowed a detailed hazard
assessment to be performed. Considering the remoteness of the Thangothang
Chhu valley, a future monitoring strategy is also proposed based entirely on
EO data, with the objectives of (1) detecting potential critical evolution of
the glacial lake and of its surroundings, (2) surveying the Thangothang Chhu
glacier and Wa-007 lake surface evolution, (3) assessing the hanging glaciers
and slope<?pagebreak page137?> instability evolution, (4) monitoring the kinematics of
permafrost-related landforms (rock glaciers) and of shallow landslides.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e2824">Product description, metadata, guidelines for use and
validation results, as well as EO data procurement, are available under
<uri>http://repository.supsi.ch/10500/</uri> (Sauerbier et al.,
2015.).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e2833">CS performed the GLOF hazard assessment based on maps, data and
interpretations provided by CA for landslide hazard assessment and
evolution; MC carried out the numerical modelling of the flood wave from the lake outburst, and
TS performed the InSAR data analysis and interpretation. CS prepared and revised the manuscript with contributions from
all co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e2839">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e2845">ERS-1/2 SAR, ENVISAT ASAR, ALOS PALSAR and Radarsat-2 data were provided by
the European Space Agency, courtesy of C1F.6504 and C1F.19889,
©ESA, JAXA and MDA, respectively. TanDEM-X data were provided by
the German Aerospace Center (DLR), courtesy of Wegmulle_NTI_INSA3397,
©DLR. TerraSAR-X data are courtesy of the EU FP7 CRYOLAND project,
©DLR. We thank the European Space Agency for financial support
(grant 4000110912-14-I-AM) and Martin Sauerbier (MFB-GeoConsulting) for the
pre-processing of the KOMPSAT-2 satellite optical data and for the production
of land cover maps. The assessment report for GLOF hazard on the Chomolhari
area, Bhutan, was revised by Philippe Bally and Holger Frey, whose comments
were considered in the redaction of this manuscript. The manuscript was
substantially improved thanks to Wilfried Haeberli, another anonymous
reviewer and Christoph Graf as the handling editor.</p></ack><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2850">This paper was edited by Christoph Graf and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Allen, S. K., Linsbauer, A., Randhawa, S. S., Huggel, C., Rana, P., and
Kumari, A.: Glacial lake outburst flood risk in Himachal Pradesh, India: an
integrative and anticipatory approach considering current and future threat,
Nat. Hazards, 84, 1741–1763, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2511-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11069-016-2511-x</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Ambrosi, C. and Scapozza, C.: Improvements in 3-D digital mapping for
geomorphological and Quaternary geological cartography, Geogr. Helv., 70,
121–133, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-70-121-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gh-70-121-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Ambrosi, C., Strozzi, T., Scapozza, C., and Wegmüller, U.: Landslide
hazard assessment in the Himalayas (Nepal and Bhutan) based on
Earth-Observation data, Eng. Geol., 237, 217–228, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.02.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.02.020</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bamler, R. and Hartl, P.: Synthetic aperture radar interferometry, Inverse
Probl., 14, R1–R54, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Bælum, K. and Benn, D. I.: Thermal structure and drainage system of a
small valley glacier (Tellbreen, Svalbard), investigated by ground
penetrating radar, The Cryosphere, 5, 139–149,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-5-139-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-5-139-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Barsch, D.: Rockglaciers – Indicators for the present and former geoecology
in high mountain environments, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 331 pp.,
1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Boeckli, L., Brenning, A., Gruber, S., and Noetzli, J.: A statistical
approach to modelling permafrost distribution in the European Alps or similar
mountain ranges, The Cryosphere, 6, 125–140,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-125-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-6-125-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Budhathoki, K. P., Bajracharya, O. R., and Pokharel, B. K.: Assessment of
Imja Glacier Lake outburst Flood (GLOF) risk in Dudh Koshi river basin using
remote Sensing Techniques, J. Hydrol. Meteorol., 7, 75–91,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3126/jhm.v7i1.5618" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3126/jhm.v7i1.5618</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Cannata, M. and Marzocchi, R.: Two-dimensional dam break flooding simulation:
a GIS-embedded approach, Nat. Hazards, 61, 1143–1159,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9974-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11069-011-9974-6</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Daanen, R. P., Grosse, G., Darrow, M. M., Hamilton, T. D., and Jones, B. M.:
Rapid movement of frozen debris-lobes: implications for permafrost
degradation and slope instability in the south-central Brooks Range, Alaska,
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 1521–1537,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1521-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-12-1521-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Delaloye, R., Lambiel, C., and Gärtner-Roer, I.: Overview of rock glacier
kinematics research in the Swiss Alps, Geogr. Helv., 65, 135–145,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-65-135-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gh-65-135-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Ferretti, C., Prati, F., and Rocca, F.: Permanent Scatterers in SAR
Interferometry, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 39, 8–20, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/36.898661" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/36.898661</ext-link>,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Frauenfelder, R. and Kääb, A.: Towards a palaeoclimatic model of
rock-glacier formation in the Swiss Alps, Ann. Glaciol., 31, 281–286,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756400781820264" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756400781820264</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Frey, H., Kääb, A., Huggel, C., Wiesmann, A., and Strozzi, T.:
S:GLA:MO Checklist for glacier lake hazard assessments V3.1, Department of
Geography, University of Zurich, Switzerland, 7 pp., 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Frey, H., Huggel, C., Bühler, Y., Buis, D., Dulce Burga, M., Choquevilca,
W., Fernandez, F., García Hernández, J., Giráldez, C., Loarte,
E., Masias, P., Portocarrero, C., Vicuña, L., and Walser, M.: A robust
debris-flow and GLOF risk management strategy for a data-scarce catchment in
Santa Teresa, Peru, Landslides, 13, 1493–1507,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0669-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10346-015-0669-z</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Gardner, J. S. and Hewitt, K.: A surge of Bualtar glacier, Karakoram range,
Pakistan: a possible landslide trigger, J. Glaciol, 36, 159–162,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000009394" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/S0022143000009394</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
GAPHAZ: Assessment of glacier and permafrost hazards in mountain regions –
Technical Guidance Document, Standing Group on Glacier and Permafrost Hazards
in Mountains (GAPHAZ) of the International Association of Cryospheric
Sciences (IACS) and the International Permafrost Association (IPA), Zurich,
Switzerland/Lima, Peru, 72 pp., 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>GLIB: Glacier and Glacial Lake Inventory of Bhutan using ALOS (Daichi) Data
(Version 12.03), Japan Aerospace Exploration<?pagebreak page138?> Agency (JAXA), available at: <uri>http://www.eorc.jaxa.jp/ALOS/en/bhutan_gli/index.htm</uri> (last
access: 2 March 2018), 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Gruber, S.: Derivation and analysis of a high-resolution estimate of global
permafrost zonation, The Cryosphere, 6, 221–233,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-221-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-6-221-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Gruber, S. and Haeberli, W.: Permafrost in steep bedrock slopes and its
temperature-related destabilization following climate change, J. Geophys.
Res., 112, F02S18, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JF000547" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JF000547</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Gruber, S., Fleiner, R., Guegan, E., Panday, P., Schmid, M.-O., Stumm, D.,
Wester, P., Zhang, Y., and Zhao, L.: Review article: Inferring permafrost and
permafrost thaw in the mountains of the Hindu Kush Himalaya region, The
Cryosphere, 11, 81–99, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-81-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-11-81-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Haeberli, W.: Frequency and characteristics of glacier floods in the Swiss
Alps, Ann. Glaciol., 4, 85–90, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/S0260305500005280" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/S0260305500005280</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Haeberli, W., Kääb, A., Vonder Mühll, D., and Teysseire, P.:
Prevention of outburst floods from periglacial lakes at Gruben Glacier,
Valais, Swiss Alps, J. Glaciol., 47, 111–122,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756501781832575" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756501781832575</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Haeberli, W., Schaub, Y., and Huggel, C.: Increasing risks related to
landslides from degrading permafrost into new lakes in de-glaciating mountain
ranges, Geomorphology, 293, 405–417, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.02.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.02.009</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Haemmig, C., Huss, M., Keusen, H., Hess, J., Wegmüller, U., Ao, Z., and
Kulubayi, W.: Hazard assessment of glacial lake outburst floods from Kyagar
glacier, Karakoram mountains, China, Ann. Glaciol., 55, 34–44,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2014AoG66A001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/2014AoG66A001</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Huggel, C.: Assessment of glacial hazards based on remote sensing and GIS
modeling, Schrift. Phys. Geogr. Glaz. Geomorpho., 44, 1–75, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Huggel, C., Kääb, A., Haeberli, W., Teysseire, P., and Paul, F.:
Remote sensing based assessment of hazards from glacier lake outburst: a case
study in the Swiss Alps, Can. Geotech. J., 39, 316–300, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/T01-099" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/T01-099</ext-link>,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Huggel, C., Haeberli, W., Kääb, A., Bieri, D., and Richardson, S.: An
assessment procedure for glacial hazards in the Swiss Alps, Can. Geotech. J.,
41, 1068–1083, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/T04-053" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/T04-053</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Kääb, A., Huggel, C., Barbero, S., Chiarle, M., Cordola, M., Epifani,
F., Haeberli, W., Mortara, G., Semino, P., Tamburini, A., and Viazzo, G.:
Glacier hazards at Belvedere glacier and the Monte Rosa east face, Italian
Alps, processes and mitigation, in: Proceedings of the 10th International
Symposium INTERPRAEVENT 2004, Riva del Garda, Italy, 24–27 May 2004, 67–78,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Kääb, A., Frauenfelder, R., and Roer, I: On the response of
rockglacier creep to surface temperature increase, Global Planet. Change, 56,
172–187, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.07.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.07.005</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Krautblatter, M., Funk, D., and Günzel, F. K.: Why permafrost rocks
become unstable: a rock–ice-mechanical model in time and space, Earth Surf.
Proc. Land., 38, 876–887, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3374" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/esp.3374</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Linsbauer, A., Frey, H., Haeberli, W., Machguth, H., Azam, M. F., and Allen,
S.: Modelling glacier-bed overdeepenings and possible future lakes for the
glacier areas in the Himalaya–Karakoram region, Ann. Glaciol., 57, 119–130,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2016AoG71A627" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/2016AoG71A627</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Meteoblue: Climate Chomolhari, Paro, Bhutan, 27.82<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
89.27<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 7314 m a.s.l., available at:
<uri>https://www.meteoblue.com/en/weather/forecast/modelclimate/chomolhari_bhutan_1252607</uri>,
last access: 20 November 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Nayar, A.: When the ice melts, Nature, 461, 1042–1046, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/4611042a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/4611042a</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Palden, T.: Experts find earthquake did not cause GLOF, Kuensel Online,
available at: <uri>http://www.kuenselonline.com/experts-find-earthquake-did-not-cause-glof/</uri> (last access: 15 August 2018), 14 August 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Paul, P., Bolch, T., Kääb, A., Nagler, T., Nuth, C., Scharrer, K.,
Shepherd, A., Strozzi, T., Ticconi, F., and Bhambri, R.: The glaciers climate
change initiative: Methods for creating glacier area; elevation change and
velocity products, Remote Sens. Environ., 162, 408–426,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.07.043" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2013.07.043</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Reynolds, J.: On the formation of supraglacial lakes on debris-covered
glaciers, in: Debris-covered glaciers, edited by:
Nakawo, M., Raymond, C. F., and Fountain A., IAHS Publication, 264, IAHS Press, Wallingford,
England, 153–161, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>RGI Consortium: Randolph Glacier Inventory – A Dataset of Global Glacier
Outlines, Version 6.0, Technical Report, Global Land Ice Measurements from
Space, Colorado, USA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7265/N5-RGI-60" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7265/N5-RGI-60</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Richardson, S. and Reynolds, J.: An overview of glacial hazards in the
Himalayas, Quatern. Int., 65–66, 31–37, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6182(99)00035-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1040-6182(99)00035-X</ext-link>,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Sakai, A., Nishimura, K., Kadota, T., and Takeuchi, N.: Onset of calving at
supraglacial lakes on debris-covered glaciers of the Nepal Himalaya, J.
Glaciol., 55, 909–917, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/002214309790152555" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/002214309790152555</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Salzmann, N., Kääb, A., Huggel, C., Allgöwer, B., and Haeberli,
W.: Assessment of the hazard potential of ice avalanches using remote sensing
and GIS-modelling, Norsk Geogr. Tidsskr., 58, 74–84,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00291950410006805" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/00291950410006805</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Sauerbier, M., Baumgartner, M., Strozzi, T., Wiesmann, A., Ambrosi, C., and
Scapozza, C.: ESA/WB collaboration on Satellite EO in the Himalayas (Nepal
and Bhutan), Operational Documentation, eoworld – Earth Observation for
Development, Frascati, Italy, 105 pp., available at:
<uri>http://repository.supsi.ch/10500/</uri> (last access: 27 March 2019),
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Scapozza, C.: Assessment report for Glacial Lake Outburst Flood hazard on the
Chomolhari area, Bhutan
(89<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>59.24<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">"</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> E/27<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>48<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>9.70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">"</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> N), ESA/World Bank
collaboration on satellite EO in the Himalayas (Nepal and Bhutan), Frascati,
Italy, 31 pp., 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Scapozza, C., Lambiel, C., Bozzini, C., Mari, S., and Conedera, M.: Assessing
the rock glacier kinematics on three different time scales: a case study from
the Southern Swiss Alps, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 39, 2056–2069,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3599" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/esp.3599</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Schaub, Y., Haeberli, W., Huggel, C., Künzler, M., and Bründl, M.:
Landslides and new lakes in deglaciating areas: a risk management framework,
in: The Second World Landslide Forum, Landslide Science and Practice, 7,
edited by: Margottini, C., Canuti, P., and Sassa, K., Springer, Heidelberg,
Germany, 31–38, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31313-4_5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-642-31313-4_5</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page139?><ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Schaub, Y., Huggel, C., and Cochachin, A.: Ice-avalanche scenario elaboration
and uncertainty propagation in numerical simulation of
rock-/ice-avalanche-induced impact waves at Mount Hualcán and Lake 513,
Peru, Landslides, 13, 1–15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0658-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10346-015-0658-2</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Schneider, D., Huggel, C., Cochachin, A., Guillén, S., and García, J.:
Mapping hazards from glacier lake outburst floods based on modelling of
process cascades at Lake 513, Carhuaz, Peru, Adv. Geosci., 35, 145–155,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-35-145-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/adgeo-35-145-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Strozzi, T., Luckman, A., Murray, T., Wegmüller, U., and Werner, C.:
Glacier motion estimation using SAR offset-tracking procedures, IEEE T.
Geosci. Remote, 40, 2384–2391, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.805079" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TGRS.2002.805079</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Sugiyama, S., Bauder, A., Huss, M., Riesen, P., and Funk, M.: Triggering and
drainage mechanisms of the 2004 glacier-dammed lake outburst in
Gornergletscher, Switzerland, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 113, F4,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JF000920" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JF000920</ext-link>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Thayyen, R. J. and Gergan, J. T.: Role of glaciers in watershed hydrology: a
preliminary study of a “Himalayan catchment”, The Cryosphere, 4, 115–128,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-4-115-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-4-115-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Westoby, M. J., Glasser, N. F., Brasington, J., Hambrey, M. J., Quincey, D.
J., and Reynolds, J. M.: Modelling outburst floods from moraine-dammed
glacial lakes, Earth-Sci. Rev., 134, 137–159,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.03.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.03.009</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Westoby, M. J., Brasington, J., Glasser, N. F., Hambrey, M. J., Hassan, M. A.
A. M., and Lowe, A.: Numerical modelling of glacial lake outburst floods
using physically based dam-breach models, Earth Surf. Dynam., 3, 171–199,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-3-171-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esurf-3-171-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Glacial lake outburst flood hazard assessment by satellite Earth observation in the Himalayas (Chomolhari area, Bhutan)</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>A case study of glacial lakes outburst flood (GLOF) hazard
assessment by satellite Earth observation (EO) and numerical modelling is
presented for the supraglacial and ice-contact lakes on Thangothang Chhu
glacier, Chomolhari area (Bhutan). Detailed geomorphological mapping,
including landslide and rock glacier inventories, as well as surface
displacement determination using an interferometric SAR (InSAR) satellite,
allowed a GLOF hazard assessment for lake Wa-007 to be performed. Outburst
scenario modelling was achieved by combining both empirical and numerical
modelling approaches, revealing that only a flood wave can have an impact on
the two human settlements located downslope of Wa-007 lake. The worst-case
scenario, modelled thanks to r.damflood, allowed the wave-front
arrival time, the maximum water depth and the arrival time of maximum water
height for the two human settlements to be quantified. A long-term monitoring strategy based
entirely on EO data, with an update cycle of 5 years, is proposed to assess
the future evolution of the area.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, S. K., Linsbauer, A., Randhawa, S. S., Huggel, C., Rana, P., and
Kumari, A.: Glacial lake outburst flood risk in Himachal Pradesh, India: an
integrative and anticipatory approach considering current and future threat,
Nat. Hazards, 84, 1741–1763, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2511-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2511-x</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Ambrosi, C. and Scapozza, C.: Improvements in 3-D digital mapping for
geomorphological and Quaternary geological cartography, Geogr. Helv., 70,
121–133, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-70-121-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-70-121-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Ambrosi, C., Strozzi, T., Scapozza, C., and Wegmüller, U.: Landslide
hazard assessment in the Himalayas (Nepal and Bhutan) based on
Earth-Observation data, Eng. Geol., 237, 217–228, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.02.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.02.020</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bamler, R. and Hartl, P.: Synthetic aperture radar interferometry, Inverse
Probl., 14, R1–R54, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bælum, K. and Benn, D. I.: Thermal structure and drainage system of a
small valley glacier (Tellbreen, Svalbard), investigated by ground
penetrating radar, The Cryosphere, 5, 139–149,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-5-139-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-5-139-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Barsch, D.: Rockglaciers – Indicators for the present and former geoecology
in high mountain environments, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 331 pp.,
1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Boeckli, L., Brenning, A., Gruber, S., and Noetzli, J.: A statistical
approach to modelling permafrost distribution in the European Alps or similar
mountain ranges, The Cryosphere, 6, 125–140,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-125-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-125-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Budhathoki, K. P., Bajracharya, O. R., and Pokharel, B. K.: Assessment of
Imja Glacier Lake outburst Flood (GLOF) risk in Dudh Koshi river basin using
remote Sensing Techniques, J. Hydrol. Meteorol., 7, 75–91,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3126/jhm.v7i1.5618" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3126/jhm.v7i1.5618</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Cannata, M. and Marzocchi, R.: Two-dimensional dam break flooding simulation:
a GIS-embedded approach, Nat. Hazards, 61, 1143–1159,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9974-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9974-6</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Daanen, R. P., Grosse, G., Darrow, M. M., Hamilton, T. D., and Jones, B. M.:
Rapid movement of frozen debris-lobes: implications for permafrost
degradation and slope instability in the south-central Brooks Range, Alaska,
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 1521–1537,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1521-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1521-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Delaloye, R., Lambiel, C., and Gärtner-Roer, I.: Overview of rock glacier
kinematics research in the Swiss Alps, Geogr. Helv., 65, 135–145,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-65-135-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-65-135-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Ferretti, C., Prati, F., and Rocca, F.: Permanent Scatterers in SAR
Interferometry, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 39, 8–20, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/36.898661" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/36.898661</a>,
2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Frauenfelder, R. and Kääb, A.: Towards a palaeoclimatic model of
rock-glacier formation in the Swiss Alps, Ann. Glaciol., 31, 281–286,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756400781820264" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756400781820264</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Frey, H., Kääb, A., Huggel, C., Wiesmann, A., and Strozzi, T.:
S:GLA:MO Checklist for glacier lake hazard assessments V3.1, Department of
Geography, University of Zurich, Switzerland, 7 pp., 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Frey, H., Huggel, C., Bühler, Y., Buis, D., Dulce Burga, M., Choquevilca,
W., Fernandez, F., García Hernández, J., Giráldez, C., Loarte,
E., Masias, P., Portocarrero, C., Vicuña, L., and Walser, M.: A robust
debris-flow and GLOF risk management strategy for a data-scarce catchment in
Santa Teresa, Peru, Landslides, 13, 1493–1507,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0669-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0669-z</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Gardner, J. S. and Hewitt, K.: A surge of Bualtar glacier, Karakoram range,
Pakistan: a possible landslide trigger, J. Glaciol, 36, 159–162,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000009394" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000009394</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
GAPHAZ: Assessment of glacier and permafrost hazards in mountain regions –
Technical Guidance Document, Standing Group on Glacier and Permafrost Hazards
in Mountains (GAPHAZ) of the International Association of Cryospheric
Sciences (IACS) and the International Permafrost Association (IPA), Zurich,
Switzerland/Lima, Peru, 72 pp., 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
GLIB: Glacier and Glacial Lake Inventory of Bhutan using ALOS (Daichi) Data
(Version 12.03), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), available at: <a href="http://www.eorc.jaxa.jp/ALOS/en/bhutan_gli/index.htm" target="_blank">http://www.eorc.jaxa.jp/ALOS/en/bhutan_gli/index.htm</a> (last
access: 2 March 2018), 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Gruber, S.: Derivation and analysis of a high-resolution estimate of global
permafrost zonation, The Cryosphere, 6, 221–233,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-221-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-221-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Gruber, S. and Haeberli, W.: Permafrost in steep bedrock slopes and its
temperature-related destabilization following climate change, J. Geophys.
Res., 112, F02S18, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JF000547" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JF000547</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Gruber, S., Fleiner, R., Guegan, E., Panday, P., Schmid, M.-O., Stumm, D.,
Wester, P., Zhang, Y., and Zhao, L.: Review article: Inferring permafrost and
permafrost thaw in the mountains of the Hindu Kush Himalaya region, The
Cryosphere, 11, 81–99, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-81-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-81-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Haeberli, W.: Frequency and characteristics of glacier floods in the Swiss
Alps, Ann. Glaciol., 4, 85–90, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/S0260305500005280" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/S0260305500005280</a>, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Haeberli, W., Kääb, A., Vonder Mühll, D., and Teysseire, P.:
Prevention of outburst floods from periglacial lakes at Gruben Glacier,
Valais, Swiss Alps, J. Glaciol., 47, 111–122,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756501781832575" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756501781832575</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Haeberli, W., Schaub, Y., and Huggel, C.: Increasing risks related to
landslides from degrading permafrost into new lakes in de-glaciating mountain
ranges, Geomorphology, 293, 405–417, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.02.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.02.009</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Haemmig, C., Huss, M., Keusen, H., Hess, J., Wegmüller, U., Ao, Z., and
Kulubayi, W.: Hazard assessment of glacial lake outburst floods from Kyagar
glacier, Karakoram mountains, China, Ann. Glaciol., 55, 34–44,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2014AoG66A001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/2014AoG66A001</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Huggel, C.: Assessment of glacial hazards based on remote sensing and GIS
modeling, Schrift. Phys. Geogr. Glaz. Geomorpho., 44, 1–75, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Huggel, C., Kääb, A., Haeberli, W., Teysseire, P., and Paul, F.:
Remote sensing based assessment of hazards from glacier lake outburst: a case
study in the Swiss Alps, Can. Geotech. J., 39, 316–300, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1139/T01-099" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1139/T01-099</a>,
2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Huggel, C., Haeberli, W., Kääb, A., Bieri, D., and Richardson, S.: An
assessment procedure for glacial hazards in the Swiss Alps, Can. Geotech. J.,
41, 1068–1083, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1139/T04-053" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1139/T04-053</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Kääb, A., Huggel, C., Barbero, S., Chiarle, M., Cordola, M., Epifani,
F., Haeberli, W., Mortara, G., Semino, P., Tamburini, A., and Viazzo, G.:
Glacier hazards at Belvedere glacier and the Monte Rosa east face, Italian
Alps, processes and mitigation, in: Proceedings of the 10th International
Symposium INTERPRAEVENT 2004, Riva del Garda, Italy, 24–27 May 2004, 67–78,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Kääb, A., Frauenfelder, R., and Roer, I: On the response of
rockglacier creep to surface temperature increase, Global Planet. Change, 56,
172–187, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.07.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.07.005</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Krautblatter, M., Funk, D., and Günzel, F. K.: Why permafrost rocks
become unstable: a rock–ice-mechanical model in time and space, Earth Surf.
Proc. Land., 38, 876–887, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3374" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3374</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Linsbauer, A., Frey, H., Haeberli, W., Machguth, H., Azam, M. F., and Allen,
S.: Modelling glacier-bed overdeepenings and possible future lakes for the
glacier areas in the Himalaya–Karakoram region, Ann. Glaciol., 57, 119–130,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2016AoG71A627" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/2016AoG71A627</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Meteoblue: Climate Chomolhari, Paro, Bhutan, 27.82°&thinsp;N,
89.27°&thinsp;E, 7314&thinsp;m&thinsp;a.s.l., available at:
<a href="https://www.meteoblue.com/en/weather/forecast/modelclimate/chomolhari_bhutan_1252607" target="_blank">https://www.meteoblue.com/en/weather/forecast/modelclimate/chomolhari_bhutan_1252607</a>,
last access: 20 November 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Nayar, A.: When the ice melts, Nature, 461, 1042–1046, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/4611042a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/4611042a</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Palden, T.: Experts find earthquake did not cause GLOF, Kuensel Online,
available at: <a href="http://www.kuenselonline.com/experts-find-earthquake-did-not-cause-glof/" target="_blank">http://www.kuenselonline.com/experts-find-earthquake-did-not-cause-glof/</a> (last access: 15 August 2018), 14 August 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Paul, P., Bolch, T., Kääb, A., Nagler, T., Nuth, C., Scharrer, K.,
Shepherd, A., Strozzi, T., Ticconi, F., and Bhambri, R.: The glaciers climate
change initiative: Methods for creating glacier area; elevation change and
velocity products, Remote Sens. Environ., 162, 408–426,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.07.043" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.07.043</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Reynolds, J.: On the formation of supraglacial lakes on debris-covered
glaciers, in: Debris-covered glaciers, edited by:
Nakawo, M., Raymond, C. F., and Fountain A., IAHS Publication, 264, IAHS Press, Wallingford,
England, 153–161, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
RGI Consortium: Randolph Glacier Inventory – A Dataset of Global Glacier
Outlines, Version 6.0, Technical Report, Global Land Ice Measurements from
Space, Colorado, USA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.7265/N5-RGI-60" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.7265/N5-RGI-60</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Richardson, S. and Reynolds, J.: An overview of glacial hazards in the
Himalayas, Quatern. Int., 65–66, 31–37, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6182(99)00035-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6182(99)00035-X</a>,
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Sakai, A., Nishimura, K., Kadota, T., and Takeuchi, N.: Onset of calving at
supraglacial lakes on debris-covered glaciers of the Nepal Himalaya, J.
Glaciol., 55, 909–917, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/002214309790152555" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/002214309790152555</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Salzmann, N., Kääb, A., Huggel, C., Allgöwer, B., and Haeberli,
W.: Assessment of the hazard potential of ice avalanches using remote sensing
and GIS-modelling, Norsk Geogr. Tidsskr., 58, 74–84,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00291950410006805" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/00291950410006805</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Sauerbier, M., Baumgartner, M., Strozzi, T., Wiesmann, A., Ambrosi, C., and
Scapozza, C.: ESA/WB collaboration on Satellite EO in the Himalayas (Nepal
and Bhutan), Operational Documentation, eoworld – Earth Observation for
Development, Frascati, Italy, 105 pp., available at:
<a href="http://repository.supsi.ch/10500/" target="_blank">http://repository.supsi.ch/10500/</a> (last access: 27 March 2019),
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Scapozza, C.: Assessment report for Glacial Lake Outburst Flood hazard on the
Chomolhari area, Bhutan
(89°20′59.24"&thinsp;E/27°48′9.70"&thinsp;N), ESA/World Bank
collaboration on satellite EO in the Himalayas (Nepal and Bhutan), Frascati,
Italy, 31 pp., 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Scapozza, C., Lambiel, C., Bozzini, C., Mari, S., and Conedera, M.: Assessing
the rock glacier kinematics on three different time scales: a case study from
the Southern Swiss Alps, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 39, 2056–2069,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3599" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3599</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Schaub, Y., Haeberli, W., Huggel, C., Künzler, M., and Bründl, M.:
Landslides and new lakes in deglaciating areas: a risk management framework,
in: The Second World Landslide Forum, Landslide Science and Practice, 7,
edited by: Margottini, C., Canuti, P., and Sassa, K., Springer, Heidelberg,
Germany, 31–38, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31313-4_5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31313-4_5</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Schaub, Y., Huggel, C., and Cochachin, A.: Ice-avalanche scenario elaboration
and uncertainty propagation in numerical simulation of
rock-/ice-avalanche-induced impact waves at Mount Hualcán and Lake 513,
Peru, Landslides, 13, 1–15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0658-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0658-2</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Schneider, D., Huggel, C., Cochachin, A., Guillén, S., and García, J.:
Mapping hazards from glacier lake outburst floods based on modelling of
process cascades at Lake 513, Carhuaz, Peru, Adv. Geosci., 35, 145–155,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-35-145-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-35-145-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Strozzi, T., Luckman, A., Murray, T., Wegmüller, U., and Werner, C.:
Glacier motion estimation using SAR offset-tracking procedures, IEEE T.
Geosci. Remote, 40, 2384–2391, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.805079" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.805079</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Sugiyama, S., Bauder, A., Huss, M., Riesen, P., and Funk, M.: Triggering and
drainage mechanisms of the 2004 glacier-dammed lake outburst in
Gornergletscher, Switzerland, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 113, F4,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JF000920" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JF000920</a>, 2008.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Thayyen, R. J. and Gergan, J. T.: Role of glaciers in watershed hydrology: a
preliminary study of a “Himalayan catchment”, The Cryosphere, 4, 115–128,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-4-115-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-4-115-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Westoby, M. J., Glasser, N. F., Brasington, J., Hambrey, M. J., Quincey, D.
J., and Reynolds, J. M.: Modelling outburst floods from moraine-dammed
glacial lakes, Earth-Sci. Rev., 134, 137–159,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.03.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.03.009</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Westoby, M. J., Brasington, J., Glasser, N. F., Hambrey, M. J., Hassan, M. A.
A. M., and Lowe, A.: Numerical modelling of glacial lake outburst floods
using physically based dam-breach models, Earth Surf. Dynam., 3, 171–199,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-3-171-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-3-171-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
