188 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Integrating geo-biodiversity features in the analysis of landscape patterns I. Pătru-Stupariu et al. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.010
2. Geological and Geomorphological Conditions Supporting the Diversity of Rock Landforms in the Pohořská Mountains (South Bohemia, Czech Republic) J. Rypl et al. 10.1007/s12371-020-00430-1
3. Evaluation of a Paleontological Museum as Geosite and Base for Geotourism. A Case Study G. Herrera-Franco et al. 10.3390/heritage4030067
4. Empirical study of the coupling relationship between biodiversity and environmental geology under different ecological status: Evidence from five typical areas in Guizhou, China Y. Xie et al. 10.1007/s11356-022-18878-9
5. Quantitative Geodiversity Assessment of the Fruška Gora Mt. (North Serbia) by Using the Geodiversity Index T. Micić Ponjiger et al. 10.1007/s12371-021-00572-w
6. Geodiversity and land cover diversity from coast to mountains in Northern Albania G. Albert & D. Kraja 10.2478/mgr-2025-0005
7. A New Quantitative Model for Comprehensive Geodiversity Evaluation: the Škocjan Caves Regional Park, Slovenia U. Stepišnik & A. Trenchovska 10.1007/s12371-017-0216-5
8. Incorporating geodiversity in ecosystem service decisions N. Fox et al. 10.1080/26395916.2020.1758214
9. How Greek Students Perceive Concepts Related to Geoenvironment: A Semiotics Content Analysis E. Georgousis et al. 10.3390/geosciences12040172
10. Quantitative Assessment of Geodiversity for Conservation Purposes in Slovenské rudohorie Mountains (Slovakia) M. Barančoková et al. 10.3390/land12091650
11. Geodiversity: developing the paradigm M. Gray 10.1016/S0016-7878(08)80307-0
12. Geodiversity Index Map of Rio Grande do Norte State, Northeast Brazil: Cartography and Quantitative Assessment M. Dias et al. 10.1007/s12371-021-00532-4
13. A New Methodological Contribution for the Geodiversity Assessment: Applicability to Ceará State (Brazil) A. Araujo & D. Pereira 10.1007/s12371-017-0250-3
14. Geodiversity: a significant, multi-faceted and evolving, geoscientific paradigm rather than a redundant term M. Gray 10.1016/j.pgeola.2021.09.001
15. From geodiversity assessment to geosite analysis – a GIS-aided workflow from the Bakony–Balaton UNESCO Global Geopark, Hungary M. Pál & G. Albert 10.1144/SP530-2022-126
16. The Geomorphodiversity of Cerro Colorado (Córdoba, Argentina): A Key Factor in Geo-Cultural Heritage Assessment G. Boretto et al. 10.1007/s12371-024-00963-9
17. The Mefite in the Ansanto Valley (Southern Italy): a Geoarchaeosite to Promote the Geotourism and Geoconservation of the Irpinian Cultural Landscape M. Sisto et al. 10.1007/s12371-020-00450-x
18. Brief Notes on Geodiversity and Geoheritage Perception by the Lay Public L. Kubalíková et al. 10.3390/geosciences11020054
19. Geomorphology and geosystem services of the Indren-Cimalegna area (Monte Rosa massif – Western Italian Alps) F. Tognetto et al. 10.1080/17445647.2021.1898484
20. Inclusion of explicit measures of geodiversity improve biodiversity models in a boreal landscape J. Hjort et al. 10.1007/s10531-012-0376-1
21. Geoheritage Research Trends: A Comparative Bibliometric Analysis of Global and Türkiye Perspectives Using R Programming Y. Göktaş & Z. Boyraz 10.1007/s12371-025-01107-3
22. Changing glaciers in a changing climate: how vanishing geomorphosites have been driving deep changes in mountain landscapes and environments G. Diolaiuti & C. Smiraglia 10.4000/geomorphologie.7882
23. Geoheritage and Cultural-Religious Heritage of Samalute-Minia Area in North Egypt E. Khalaf 10.1007/s12371-023-00903-z
24. Geoheritage in a Forest: Traces of Ice Sheets in Pałuki, Western Poland M. Górska-Zabielska 10.3390/su14127190
25. Quantitative measurement of geodiversity uniqueness: research implications and conservation applications J. Alahuhta et al. 10.1098/rsta.2023.0056
26. The point bonitation method for evaluating geodiversity: a guide with examples (polish lowland) R. Kot 10.1111/geoa.12079
27. Geoheritage in a Mythical and Volcanic Terrain: an Inventory and Assessment Study for Geopark and Geotourism, Nemrut Volcano (Bitlis, Eastern Turkey) C. Ertekin et al. 10.1007/s12371-021-00593-5
28. Soft Mobility and Geoheritage: E-Biking as a Tool for Sustainable Tourism in Mountain Environments A. Senese et al. 10.3390/tourhosp6020106
29. Identification of geodiversity in Kalimpong District, India: A geospatial assessment using geodiversity index and multi-criterion decision analysis approach A. Sarkar et al. 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2025.06.001
30. Comparative Analysis of Geomorphosites in Volcanoes of Costa Rica, Mexico, and Spain D. Pérez-Umaña et al. 10.1007/s12371-018-0313-0
31. Insights of long‐term geomorphological evolution of coastal landscapes in hot‐spot oceanic islands N. Ferrer‐Valero et al. 10.1002/esp.4518
32. Multivariate Analysis of Geological Data for Regional Studies of Geodiversity L. Erikstad et al. 10.3390/resources11060051
33. Geotouristic Route Proposal for Touristic Development in a Mining Area—Case Study P. Carrión-Mero et al. 10.3390/resources11030025
34. Geodiversity and Biodiversity H. Tukiainen et al. 10.1144/SP530-2022-107
35. Geodiversity assessment in the Ganos (Isıklar) Mount (NW Turkey) E. Özşahin 10.1007/s12665-017-6591-z
36. Geodiversity and Geomorphosite Assessment Applied to a Natural Protected Area: the Ebro and Rudron Gorges Natural Park (Spain) R. Pellitero et al. 10.1007/s12371-010-0022-9
37. Geoturist Evaluation of Geosites in the Tuchola Forest Biosphere Reserve (N Poland) A. Krawiec et al. 10.3390/resources11020013
38. Combining biodiversity and geodiversity on landscape scale: A novel approach using rare earth elements and spatial distribution models in an agricultural Mediterranean landscape S. Pelacani et al. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111583
39. Identification of Potential Areas for the Development of Geotourism in the Northern Part of the M’goun Geopark (Morocco) Using Multi-Criteria Analysis and Sig E. Louz et al. 10.1007/s12371-024-01054-5
40. Recognition of Potential Geosites Utilizing a Hydrological Model within Qualitative–Quantitative Assessment of Geodiversity in the Manawatu River Catchment, New Zealand V. Zakharovskyi & K. Németh 10.3390/geographies3010011
41. Geodiversity impacts plant community structure in a semi-arid region N. De Falco et al. 10.1038/s41598-021-94698-0
42. Understanding Geodiversity for Sustainable Development in the Chinchiná River Basin, Caldas, Colombia A. Arias-Díaz et al. 10.3390/land12112053
43. Mid‐ and large‐scale geodiversity calculation in fuentes carrionas (nw spain) and serra do cadeado (paraná, brazil): methodology and application for land management R. Pellitero et al. 10.1111/geoa.12057
44. Geodiversity: dimensions, connotations, and associations O. Radzivill & V. Grytsenko 10.15407/gb2208
45. The Geomorphodiversity of the Dolomites (Italy): A Key of Geoheritage Assessment M. Panizza 10.1007/s12371-009-0003-z
46. Assessment of geodiversity of Parbati River Basin in North-Western Himalayan region, India V. Bajala et al. 10.1080/10106049.2022.2082557
47. Quantitative assessment of the geodiversity of M’Goun UNESCO Geopark, Central High Atlas (Morocco) A. Elkaichi et al. 10.1007/s12517-021-09235-0
48. Studying hydrogeochemical processes to understand hydrodiversity and the related natural and cultural heritage. The case of Los Hoyos area (South Spain) J. Gil-Márquez et al. 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106422
49. Itinerario geológico de la franja costera entre el Aeropuerto Internacional Simón Bolívar y la Bahía de Taganga, Provincia Geotectónica de Santa Marta J. Säenz-Reyes et al. 10.15446/rbct.n42.44920
50. Reflections of geodiversity–culture relationships within the concept of abiotic ecosystem services L. Kubalíková & P. Coratza 10.1144/SP530-2022-155
51. Characterization and Quantitative Assessment of Geodiversity in Danxiashan UNESCO Global Geopark of China Z. Zhang et al. 10.1007/s12371-024-01044-7
52. Old Processes, New Movements: The Inclusion of Geodiversity in Biological and Ecological Discourse A. Boothroyd & M. McHenry 10.3390/d11110216
53. Qualitative-Quantitative Assessment of Geodiversity of Western Samoa (SW Pacific) to Identify Places of Interest for Further Geoconservation, Geoeducation, and Geotourism Development V. Zakharovskyi & K. Németh 10.3390/geographies1030020
54. Does geodiversity correlate with land use/land cover diversity? A case study of Birbhum district, West Bengal, India K. Datta 10.1016/j.pgeola.2022.07.004
55. Analysis of quantitative methods for geodiversity in Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil R. Torlay et al. 10.1590/s1982-21702022000300014
56. Calculation of Geodiversity from Landscape Units of the Cadeado Range Region in Paraná, Brazil F. Manosso & M. de Nóbrega 10.1007/s12371-015-0152-1
57. Landform values for rural sustainability: Recognition and assessment in a Spanish–Portuguese border region case study E. De Uña-Álvarez et al. 10.1515/mgr-2017-0022
58. Geodiversity Assessment of Paraná State (Brazil): An Innovative Approach D. Pereira et al. 10.1007/s00267-013-0100-2
59. Identifying Optimal Cell Size for Geodiversity Quantitative Assessment with Richness, Diversity and Evenness Indices C. Lopes et al. 10.3390/resources12060065
60. Impact of different roughness coefficients applied to relief diversity evaluation: Chełmno Lakeland (Polish Lowland) R. Kot & K. Leśniak 10.1080/04353676.2017.1286547
61. A Discussion on the Quantification and Classification of Geodiversity Indices Based on GIS Methodological Tests J. Gonçalves et al. 10.1007/s12371-020-00458-3
62. De la géoconservation au géotourisme : un glissement de paradigme A. Poiraud & G. Dandurand 10.3917/ag.717.0625
63. Geosensitivity assessment for the formulation of geoconservation strategies in the Darjeeling Hill region, India P. Dutta et al. 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2025.02.005
64. Geodiversity Assessment as a First Step in Designating Areas of Geotourism Potential. Case Study: Western Carpathians A. Chrobak et al. 10.3389/feart.2021.752669
65. State of the Art of Geodiversity, Geoconservation, and Geotourism in Costa Rica A. Quesada-Román & D. Pérez-Umaña 10.3390/geosciences10060211
66. Scale Influence on Qualitative–Quantitative Geodiversity Assessments for the Geosite Recognition of Western Samoa V. Zakharovskyi & K. Németh 10.3390/geographies2030029
67. Assessment of geomorphodiversity and the impacts of urban growth in Puerto Madryn, Patagonia, Argentina C. Rito et al. 10.1016/j.jsames.2022.104018
68. Criteria for Selecting Areas to Identify Ecosystem Services Provided by Geodiversity: A Study on the Coast of São Paulo, Brazil D. Queiroz et al. 10.3390/resources11100092
69. Diversity of Volcanic Geoheritage in the Canary Islands, Spain J. Dóniz-Páez et al. 10.3390/geosciences10100390
70. Spatial correlation analysis between topographic parameters for defining the geomorphometric diversity index: application in the environmental protection area of the Serra da Esperança (state of Paraná, Brazil) J. da Silva et al. 10.1007/s12665-019-8357-2
71. The Geodiversity of Brazil: Quantification, Distribution, and Implications for Conservation Areas J. de Paula Silva et al. 10.1007/s12371-021-00598-0
72. Geodiversity Hotspots: Concept, Method and Cartographic Application for Geoconservation Purposes at a Regional Scale F. Bétard & J. Peulvast 10.1007/s00267-019-01168-5
73. Les sites géomorphologiques, une base pour le géotourisme dans les parcs naturels régionaux J. Bussard & E. Reynard 10.4000/dynenviron.1195
74. Geodiversity and Landscape Services in the Region of Ogulinsko-Plašćanska Zavala, Croatia V. Butorac & N. Buzjak 10.2478/eko-2020-0010
75. Geodiversity of high-latitude landscapes in northern Finland J. Hjort & M. Luoto 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.09.039
76. Evaluating Scientific Value of Geodiversity for Natural Protected Sites: the Biga Peninsula, Northwestern Turkey Z. Çetiner et al. 10.1007/s12371-017-0218-3
77. Assessing Geotourism Resources on a Local Level: A Case Study from Southern Moravia (Czech Republic) L. Kubalíková 10.3390/resources8030150
78. A Quantitative GIS and AHP Based Analysis for Geodiversity Assessment and Mapping A. Ferrando et al. 10.3390/su131810376
79. A framework for quantifying geodiversity at the local scale: a case study from the Rokua UNESCO Global Geopark H. Tukiainen et al. 10.1098/rsta.2023.0059
80. A Public Participation GIS for Geodiversity and Geosystem Services Mapping in a Mountain Environment: A Case from Grayson County, Virginia, U.S.A. K. Stanley et al. 10.3390/land12040835
81. A Contribution to the Understanding of the Apennine Landscapes: the Potential Role of Molise Geosites F. Filocamo et al. 10.1007/s12371-019-00365-2
82. Geodiversity inclusiveness in biodiversity assessment J. Crisp et al. 10.1177/03091333221122292
83. Glacier retreat and climate change: Documenting the last 50 years of Alpine glacier history from area and geometry changes of Dosdè Piazzi glaciers (Lombardy Alps, Italy) G. Diolaiuti et al. 10.1177/0309133311399494
84. Mapping Geodiversity at a National Scale: the Case Study of Italy I. Alberico et al. 10.1007/s12371-023-00889-8
85. Geoconservation and Geotourism: Challenges and Unifying Themes M. Williams et al. 10.1007/s12371-020-00492-1
86. Quantifying the geodiversity of a study area in the Great Hungarian Plain A. Őrsi 10.14232/jengeo-2011-43792
87. The relationship between geodiversity and biodiversity: A theoretical approach M. Ivanović 10.5937/bnsr14-54328
88. Techniques for Classifying Seabed Morphology and Composition on a Subtropical-Temperate Continental Shelf M. Linklater et al. 10.3390/geosciences9030141
89. Geodiversity, Geoconservation, and Geotourism in Central America A. Quesada-Román et al. 10.3390/land11010048
90. Geodiversity of Italy A. Casaburi et al. 10.1080/17445647.2024.2340988
91. Geoheritage in Deltaic Environments: Classification Notes, Case Example, and Geopark Implication A. Mikhailenko & D. Ruban 10.3390/environments6020018
92. The assessment of geodiversity – a premise for declaring the geopark Buzăului County (Romania) L. COMĂNESCU & A. NEDELEA 10.1007/s12040-012-0244-0
93. Quantitative-Qualitative Method for Quick Assessment of Geodiversity V. Zakharovskyi & K. Németh 10.3390/land10090946
94. HOW to use continuous variables in geodiversity assessments – RASTER continuous morphodiversity model T. Bartuś & W. Mastej 10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106597
95. Mapping and Analysis of Geodiversity Indices in the Xingu River Basin, Amazonia, Brazil J. de Paula Silva et al. 10.1007/s12371-014-0134-8
96. Current trends and future directions in quantitative geodiversity assessment J. Crisp et al. 10.1177/0309133320967219
97. Vulnerable Geosites of Çayırbağı-Çalköy (Düzköy-Trabzon) in the Eastern Black Sea Region of NE Turkey and Their Geotourism Potential F. Köroğlu & R. Kandemir 10.1007/s12371-019-00358-1
98. Pomen varovanja vročih točk geodiverzitete za ohranitev biotske pestrosti na območju Nature 2000 v dolini reke Dragonje Š. Čonč 10.3986/GV92201
99. An Introduction to Geotourism of the Mahneshan County R. Khoshraftar & N. Farsani 10.1007/s12371-022-00671-2
100. Bringing geoheritage underwater: definitions, methods, and application in two Mediterranean marine areas A. Rovere et al. 10.1007/s12665-010-0824-8
101. Are Hydrological Geosites Related to High Hydrodiversity? A Study in the State of Rio Grande do Norte, Northeast Brazil M. Terto et al. 10.3390/hydrology12090234
102. Refinement Proposals for Geodiversity Assessment—A Case Study in the Bakony–Balaton UNESCO Global Geopark, Hungary M. Pál & G. Albert 10.3390/ijgi10080566
103. The impact of subaqueous areas on geomorphodiversity: A case study within the Wielkopolska Lakeland, northern central Poland R. Kot & P. Molewski 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180127
104. Dispersed Geoheritage Points of the Lagonaki Highland, SW Russia: Contribution to Local Geoheritage Resource D. Ruban et al. 10.3390/geosciences9090367
105. Geodiversity Assessments and Geoconservation in the Northwest of Zagros Mountain Range, Iran: Grid and Fuzzy Method Analysis M. Ahmadi et al. 10.1007/s12371-022-00769-7
106. Geosystem Services of Erratic Boulders in Selected Regions of Central Poland M. Górska-Zabielska & A. Łubek 10.3390/resources14060099
107. Geodiversity assessment of Jodhpur region of Western Rajasthan, India: A remote sensing and GIS-based quantitative approach S. Mathur et al. 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2025.05.003
108. Methodological Framework for Geodiversity Application in Geographic Education from a Case Study of Canary Islands, Spain D. Abramowicz et al. 10.2478/quageo-2022-0006
109. Combined Assessment of Geodiversity As a Tool to Territorial Management: Application to Southeastern Coast of State of São Paulo, Brazil L. Pereira Balaguer et al. 10.1007/s12371-022-00696-7
110. Valuing and representing exogeodiversity: From scientific imagery to artistic imagination F. Bétard & J. Peulvast 10.4000/geomorphologie.13412
111. Geosite Assessment as a Tool for the Promotion and Conservation of Irpinia Landscape Geoheritage (Southern Italy) M. Sisto et al. 10.3390/resources11100097
112. Geoconservation and Geotourism Potential of Vulnerable Rudist Fossil Geosites from SE Anatolia (Turkey) Ö. S & M. O 10.1007/s12371-022-00650-7
113. Development of a New Type of Geodiversity System for the Scoria Cones of the Chaîne des Puys Based on Geomorphometric Studies F. Vörös et al. 10.3390/geosciences11020058
114. Anhydrite Weathering Zone with Hydration Caves at Dingwall (Nova Scotia, SE Canada) as a Potential Geosite and Geodiversity Site A. Jarzyna et al. 10.1007/s12371-023-00797-x
115. Tasmanian reserve geoconservation inventory assessment using Geographic Information Technology (GIT) M. Williams & M. McHenry 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2021.05.001
116. Geodiversity meanings in global geoparks: an empirical study D. Ruban & N. Yashalova 10.1007/s12665-018-7962-9
117. Impact of geopolitical and energy security risks on energy consumption patterns L. Qin & R. Gao 10.1177/0958305X251349478
118. Climate change effects on landscape and environment in glacierized Alpine areas: retreating glaciers and enlarging forelands in the Bernina group (Italy) in the period 1954–2007 C. D’Agata et al. 10.1080/24749508.2019.1585658
119. Can geodiversity be predicted from space? J. Hjort & M. Luoto 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.02.010
120. Appraisal of Geomorphic Diversity with Special Reference to Basin-Area Extremity in Central Lesser Himalaya A. Pande 10.1007/s12594-019-1325-3
121. From Geodiversity to Geofunctionality: Quantifying Geodiversity-Based Ecosystem Services for Landscape Planning in French Guiana O. Scammacca et al. 10.1007/s12371-023-00910-0
122. Analysis of the Geological Heritage and Geodiversity Index of Two Mountainous Areas in Spain: Béjar and El Barco Massifs R. Cruz et al. 10.1007/s12371-021-00587-3
123. Quantifying Geodiversity at the Continental Scale: Limitations and Prospects P. Wolniewicz 10.3390/resources12050059
124. Assessing the relation between geodiversity and species richness in mountain heaths and tundra landscapes H. Salminen et al. 10.1007/s10980-023-01702-1
125. The aesthetic value of Brazilian reefs: from species to seascape L. Waechter et al. 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106882
126. Geomorphodiversity index: Quantifying the diversity of landforms and physical landscape L. Melelli et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.101
127. Is Mexico a “Megageodiverse” Country? C. Canet 10.1007/s12371-023-00865-2
128. Divergence in natural diversity studies: The need to standardize methods and goals J. Ibáñez & E. Brevik 10.1016/j.catena.2019.104110
129. Pages of Earth History in an Exceptional Uniqueness: The Geo-Heritage of the Sila National Park and its Spheroidal Boulders Geosite (Northern Calabria, Italy) F. Muto et al. 10.1007/s12371-024-00937-x
130. Geological heritage diversity in the Faiyum Oasis (Egypt): A comprehensive assessment E. Sallam et al. 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2018.01.010
131. Assessment of Geomorphosites for Geotourism in the Northern Part of the “Ruta Escondida” (Quito, Ecuador) P. Carrión-Mero et al. 10.3390/su12208468
132. Geotourism Potential in Karst Geosystems: An example from the Lund Warming Ramsar Site, Minas Gerais, Brazil Í. de Sena et al. 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105717
133. Is It Worth Assessing Geodiversity Numerically? A Comparative Analysis between Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in Miguel Pereira Municipality, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil J. Gonçalves et al. 10.3390/geosciences12090347
134. Geodiversity as a precious national resource: A note on the role of geoparks D. Ruban 10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.06.007
135. Physical soil quality indicators for monitoring British soils R. Corstanje et al. 10.5194/se-8-1003-2017
136. Geomorphology of old and abandoned underground mines: Review and future challenges K. Schuchová & J. Lenart 10.1177/0309133320917314
137. Paleogeography as geological heritage: Developing geosite classification D. Bruno et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.06.005
138. Geoheritage and geodiversity management – the questions for tomorrow L. Erikstad 10.1016/j.pgeola.2012.07.003
139. Paleobiyolojik Jeosit Kavramı: Doğu Karadeniz’in K/Pg Jeositlerinde Referans Bir Çalışma, KD Türkiye / Paleobiological Geosite Concept: A Reference Study of K/Pg Geosites in the Eastern Black Sea, NE Türkiye F. Köroğlu 10.25288/tjb.1570386
140. Geodiversity Assessment of French Guiana: Challenges and Implications for Sustainable Land Planning O. Scammacca et al. 10.1007/s12371-022-00716-6
141. Seabed geodiversity in a glaciated shelf area, the Baltic Sea A. Kaskela & A. Kotilainen 10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.07.014
142. Unveiling the Spatial Heterogeneity in Uttarakhand Through Geomorphodiversity for Sustainable LULC Practices and its Implications on Seismicity V. Chauhan et al. 10.1007/s12371-024-01041-w
143. Assessment of Geosites within a Natural Protected Area: A Case Study of Cajas National Park E. Navarrete et al. 10.3390/su14053120
144. The Role and Practice of Geodiversity in Serving Ecosystems in China Y. Yu & J. Yang 10.3390/su14084547
145. Geoconservation Strategies of Türkiye F. Köroğlu & O. Mülayim 10.1007/s12371-023-00862-5
146. Geodiversity Evaluation and Water Resources in the Sesia Val Grande UNESCO Geopark (Italy) L. Perotti et al. 10.3390/w11102102
147. Exploring Ocean Floor Geodiversity in Relation to Mineral Resources in the Southwest Pacific Ocean A. Seijmonsbergen et al. 10.3390/resources11070060
148. Evaluating Tourist Perception of Environmental Changes as a Contribution to Managing Natural Resources in Glacierized Areas: A Case Study of the Forni Glacier (Stelvio National Park, Italian Alps) V. Garavaglia et al. 10.1007/s00267-012-9948-9
149. Relief of Czechia: quantitative evaluation in the GIS environment J. Demek et al. 10.37040/geografie2011116020111
150. Geodiversity assessment to regional scale: Ecuador as a case study P. Carrión-Mero et al. 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.06.009
151. Deposit-centered archaeological survey and the search for the Aegean Palaeolithic: A geoarchaeological perspective J. Holcomb et al. 10.1016/j.quaint.2020.04.043
152. Revisión bibliográfica sobre el patrimonio geológico G. Pareja Pareja & E. Martínez Ibarra 10.5209/aguc.85180
153. Advancing Geosite Evaluation through Continuous Visitor-Centric Assessment M. Pál & G. Albert 10.1007/s12371-025-01104-6
154. Towards Transferable Use of Terrain Ruggedness Component in the Geodiversity Index B. Stojilković 10.3390/resources11020022
155. Geodiversity data for Europe M. Toivanen et al. 10.1098/rsta.2023.0173
156. The Educational Potential of Geodiversity in Ferruginous Geosystem: the Example of the Quadrilátero Ferrífero, Minas Gerais, Brazil D. dos Santos et al. 10.1007/s12371-021-00550-2
157. Chicamocha Canyon Geopark project: A novel strategy for the socio-economic development of Santander (Colombia) through geoeducation, geotourism and geoconservation C. Ríos et al. 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2020.05.002
158. Assessment and Quantitative Evaluation of Loess Area Geomorphodiversity Using Multiresolution DTMs (Roztocze Region, SE Poland) M. Siłuch et al. 10.3390/resources12010007
159. Geotourism potential and challenges in the Archipelago of San Andrés, Providencia, and Santa Catalina (Colombia) D. Manco-Jaraba et al. 10.18601/01207555.n34.03
160. Donner à voir la géodiversité de la région grenobloise et dépasser le clivage ville / montagne à travers le prisme du paysage et de ses représentations I. Hubert et al. 10.4000/geomorphologie.13701
161. Strategies to Improve the Tourist Interest of a Geosite Respecting Its Natural Heritage. A Case Study P. Carrión-Mero et al. 10.1007/s12371-022-00746-0
162. Geodiversity estimate of the Arxan–Chaihe Volcanic Field extending across two geoparks in Inner Mongolia, NE China B. Li et al. 10.1144/SP530-2022-130
163. Towards a taxonomy of geodiversity J. Hjort et al. 10.1098/rsta.2023.0060
164. Multiscale wavelet-based analysis to detect hidden geodiversity M. Năpăruş-Aljančič et al. 10.1177/0309133317720835
165. Some observations and reflections on geodiversity, the oft-forgotten half of nature M. Gray 10.1144/SP530-2022-100
166. Geodiversity in the Amazon drainage basin C. Alsbach et al. 10.1098/rsta.2023.0065
167. Geopark Gemer: Geodiverzita a banské dedičstvo v geoturistike D. Hutárová et al. 10.24040/eas.2023.24.1.135-155
168. Towards a comprehensive geodiversity - biodiversity nexus in terrestrial ecosystems C. Beierkuhnlein et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2025.105075
169. Studying Hydrogeochemical Processes to Understand Hydrodiversity and the Related Natural and Cultural Heritage. The Case of Los Hoyos Area (South Spain) J. Gil-Márquez et al. 10.2139/ssrn.3944509
170. Influences of Geohazard Susceptibility on the Geodiversity of the Coromandel Peninsula, New Zealand V. Zakharovskyi et al. 10.3389/esss.2023.10083
171. Inventory and assessment of geomorphosites for geotourism development: A case study of Aït Bou Oulli valley (Central High‐Atlas, Morocco) H. Bouzekraoui et al. 10.1111/area.12380
172. Quantitative Assessments of Geodiversity in the Area of the Seridó Geopark Project, Northeast Brazil: Grid and Centroid Analysis M. da Silva et al. 10.1007/s12371-019-00368-z
173. Quantification of geomorphodiversity and its spatial distribution with the flood inundation areas for Assam, India L. Gupta & J. Dixit 10.1007/s10661-024-13200-1
174. Quantitative Assessment of Geodiversity in Ecuadorian Amazon—Case Study: Napo Sumaco Aspiring UNESCO Geopark D. Vera et al. 10.1007/s12371-023-00792-2
175. Pedodiversity of three experimental stations in Estonia K. Rannik et al. 10.1016/j.geodrs.2016.05.002
176. Geoheritage Value of Three Localities from Kislovodsk in the Southern Central Ciscaucasus: A Resource of Large Resort Area N. Yashalova & D. Ruban 10.3390/geosciences14050134
177. Geodiversity: An integrative review as a contribution to the sustainable management of the whole of nature J. Brilha et al. 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.05.001
178. Application of bivariate mapping to assess geodiversity and its geomorphic constraints: A case study in Kuwait A. Alyaqout & F. Anzah 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2025.01.002
179. Geodiversity Supports Cultural Ecosystem Services: an Assessment Using Social Media N. Fox et al. 10.1007/s12371-022-00665-0
180. Glacier shrinkage driven by climate change during half a century (1954–2007) in the Ortles-Cevedale group (Stelvio National Park, Lombardy, Italian Alps) C. D’Agata et al. 10.1007/s00704-013-0938-5
181. Optimisation of the geobiodiversity index for protected natural areas in northern Portugal A. Vieira et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.109970
182. Measuring geomorphological diversity on coastal environments: A new approach to geodiversity N. Ferrer-Valero 10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.06.013
183. Morphodiversity as a Tool in Geoconservation: A Case Study in a Mountain Area (Pieniny Mts, Poland) T. Bartuś & W. Mastej 10.3390/su151411357
184. Two Examples of the Geoheritage Potential of Piedmont (NW Italy): Verrua Savoia for the Present, Valle Ceppi for the Future M. Zunino et al. 10.1007/s12371-012-0060-6
185. An Essential Tool for Natural Heritage Management: The Geomorphological Map of Valderejo Natural Park M. González-Amuchastegui & E. Serrano 10.3390/geosciences8070250
186. Quantifying alpha, beta and gamma geodiversity H. Tukiainen et al. 10.1177/03091333221114714
187. Geodiversity and natural resource management: The importance of combustible renewables and waste in China F. Zhao et al. 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103993
188. Tourism and Biodiversity in Natura 2000 Sites. Case Study: Natura 2000 Valea Roșie (Red Valley) Site, Bihor County, Romania D. Ilieș et al. 10.4000/etudescaribeennes.11262