415 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Recognition and Assessment of Geomorphosites in Malta at the Il-Majjistral Nature and History Park P. Coratza et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-011-0034-0
2. Lamprophyre sites of Wajrakarur Kimberlite Field, Southern India: Potential candidates for developing as geoparks P. Phani et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.09.002
3. Geomorphosites and Geotourism in Bucharest City Center (Romania) L. Comănescu et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2017-0029
4. Assessment of geosites as a basis for geotourism development: A case study of the Toplica District, Serbia M. Ivanović et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2022-0589
5. A New Quantitative Model for Comprehensive Geodiversity Evaluation: the Škocjan Caves Regional Park, Slovenia U. Stepišnik & A. Trenchovska https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0216-5
6. The Geomorphosite Potential of the Badlands Around Küpyar, Manisa, Turkey Y. Güney https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00433-y
7. Evaluation of Sites of Geotouristic Interest on Active Volcanic Island La Palma, Spain for Potential Volcanic Tourism W. Ramos et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-024-01006-z
8. Géotourisme et médiation scientifique dans l’offre touristique en montagne J. Bussard & E. Reynard https://doi.org/10.4000/rga.10269
9. The role of Ecological Value in Geomorphosite assessment for the Debris-Covered Miage Glacier (Western Italian Alps) based on a review of 2.5 centuries of scientific study I. Bollati et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0111-2
10. Assessing Geosites for Sustainable Geotourism: A New Practical Tool Applied in the Beigua UNESCO Global Geopark (Italy) F. Gianoglio et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-026-01335-1
11. Inverted relief and geoheritage values of the Leśna Hill (Holy Cross Mts., Poland) – A re-evaluation of the underestimated geosite M. Bąbel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.109926
12. Promoting Palaeontological Heritage of Mammoths in Serbia Through a Cross-Country Thematic Route A. Antić et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00530-6
13. Determining Values of Geoheritage Elements Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods: A Case Study of Tokat Province (Türkiye) H. Mertol et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-026-01328-0
14. Geoheritage and Geotourism Potential of Tuwaiq Mountain, Saudi Arabia S. Sen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-023-00861-6
15. Land tenure and future development affect integrity and geodiversity in Brazilian Indigenous Geocultural sites R. Sartori Peruzzo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.109770
16. Geomorphosite assessment B. Erhartič https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS50206
17. Promoting diversity in geoheritage evaluation: creating an evaluation method for the scientific value of Quaternary sites in arid environments K. Sayama https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2023.0138
18. Evaluation of geological sites in a park environment for the needs of the Bulgarian geoparks, nature parks, and national parks D. Sinnyovsky https://doi.org/10.52215/rev.bgs.2024.85.1.11
19. Un enfoque cuantitativo para la evaluación de geositios del Parque Nacional de Talassemtane (NO de Marruecos) A. Aoulad-Sidi-Mhend et al. https://doi.org/10.3989/egeol.43448.520
20. The Volcanic Geoheritage of the Mount Bamenda Calderas (Cameroon Line): Assessment for Geotouristic and Geoeducational Purposes G. Zangmo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-016-0177-0
21. Chelmos Vouraikos UNESCO Global Geopark: Links Between Geological and Landscape Diversity with Biodiversity in the Context of Geotourism G. Iliopoulos et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geographies6010004
22. Volcanic Geoheritage: Comparative Analysis of Tungurahua Volcano UNESCO Global Geopark (Ecuador) and Tenerife Island (Spain) L. Oña Morales et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-025-01254-7
23. The Mefite in the Ansanto Valley (Southern Italy): a Geoarchaeosite to Promote the Geotourism and Geoconservation of the Irpinian Cultural Landscape M. Sisto et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00450-x
24. Comparative Study of Quantitative Assessment of the Geomorphological Heritage of the Coastal Zone of Icapuí - Ceará, Brazil M. Diniz et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3938067
25. Fieldtrips and Virtual Tours as Geotourism Resources: Examples from the Sesia Val Grande UNESCO Global Geopark (NW Italy) L. Perotti et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9060063
26. The beauty of landforms A. Smrekar et al. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.3039
27. Synthesis of Quantitative Geosite Assessment Models and Its Application on Sistan and Baluchestan Province Natural Heritages, Potential Geotourism Destination of Iran K. Derafshi & M. Seyedhamzeh https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00752-2
28. Multi-Hazard Assessment in Post-Mining Landscape and Potential for Geotourism Development (On the Example of the Central Spiš Region in Slovakia) V. Čech et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14051000
29. Evaluation of the tourist potential and natural attractivity of the Lukovska Spa A. Valjarević et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2016.12.004
30. Geoheritage Assessment and Geotourism Planning in Tangier (Morocco) C. El Kharraz et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-026-01375-7
31. Geotourism Development in World Heritage of the Lut Desert M. Maghsoudi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-018-0303-2
32. Preliminary Assessment of the Geological and Mining Heritage of the Golden Quadrilateral (Metaliferi Mountains, Romania) as a Potential Geotourism Destination V. Milu https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810114
33. Geoheritage Concept in a Context of Abiotic Ecosystem Services (Geosystem Services) — How to Argue the Geoconservation Better? J. Urban et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00688-7
34. Geoheritage, geotourism and Fibrex functional foods: a case study of Montenegro V. Vujačić et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2025-0995
35. Inventory and assessment of geomorphosites of Mountainous Phrygia (Eskişehir/Türkiye) M. Özdemir & H. Kaymak https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-025-9694-0
36. Analysis of some representative geomorphosites in the Bucegi Mountains: between scientific evaluation and tourist perception L. Comănescu & A. Nedelea https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00937.x
37. Geoheritage in Thermal Springs of Puruándiro, Michoacán, México M. Jácome Paz et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00584-6
38. Geotouristic Route Proposal for Touristic Development in a Mining Area—Case Study P. Carrión-Mero et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources11030025
39. Inventory and Assessment of Geosites for Geotourism Development in the Eastern and Southeastern Lake Tana Region, Ethiopia G. Tessema et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00560-0
40. Worldwide Research on Geoparks through Bibliometric Analysis G. Herrera-Franco et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031175
41. Inventory and quantitative assessment of Devonian geosites in the Azrou-Khenifra Basin (eastern band of the Central Hercynian Massif, Morocco) N. Akhlidej et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2024.01.002
42. Integrating Cultural Sites into the Sesia Val Grande UNESCO Global Geopark (North-West Italy): Methodologies for Monitoring and Enhancing Cultural Heritage M. Guerini et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6090322
43. Loss of natural heritage from the geomorphological perspective – Do geomorphic processes shape or destroy the natural heritage? B. Komac et al. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS51306
44. Inventory and Assessment of the Geoheritage Potential of the Imilchil District (Central High Atlas, Morocco) S. Elfaiz et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-025-01145-x
45. The Col de Braus (Maritime Alps, SE France): an Historical Geological Locality with High Geoheritage Value L. Barale & A. d’Atri https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-015-0159-7
46. Analysis of Criteria Affecting Geosite Visits by General Public: a Case of Slovak (Geo)Tourists Ľ. Štrba https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-018-0283-2
47. Comparative analysis of UNESCO Global Geoparks management: Massif des Bauges UNESCO Global Geopark (France) and M'Goun UNESCO Global Geopark (Morocco) K. Eddine et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2025.11.003
48. The role and importance of the landscape park Udin Boršt M. Šmid Hribar & M. Ferk https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.968
49. Geoconservation in Japanese geoparks and Quaternary science K. Mokudai https://doi.org/10.4116/jaqua.56.67
50. Palaeogeographical type of the geological heritage of Egypt: A new evidence E. Sallam & D. Ruban https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2017.02.022
51. Evaluating Geosites for Geotourism: A Study of the Bagh Region in Madhya Pradesh State, India Using Brilha’s Framework V. Gupta et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-025-01198-y
52. The Potential of Permanent Gullies in Europe as Geomorphosites W. Zgłobicki et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0252-1
53. Evaluating the Geoheritage and Geotourism Potential of the Gap Waterfall Nature Park, Derik, Mardin, Türkiye A. Aytaç et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-026-01350-2
54. The Volcanic and Mining Geoheritage of San Pietro Island (Sulcis, Sardinia, Italy): the Potential for Geosite Valorization A. Gioncada et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00418-6
55. The ‘ gigantic boulders ’ of the Torino Hill (NW Italy): geohistorical significance and geoheritage value L. Barale https://doi.org/10.1144/SP543-2022-241
56. Landform values for rural sustainability: Recognition and assessment in a Spanish–Portuguese border region case study E. De Uña-Álvarez et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2017-0022
57. Identifying the Most Effective Geosite Evaluation Models in Iran Using Delphi and Analytic Hierarchy Process Methods M. Ghasemi et al. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2021-0021
58. The Geological Heritage and Sustainable Development Proposed for the Project Geopark: an Example from Gabal Qatrani, Fayoum Depression, Western Desert, Egypt E. Khalaf & G. El-Kheir https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00646-3
59. Diversity of added cultural values to geomorphosites – Evidence from sandstone landscapes of Central Europe P. Migoń https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109086
60. From Geoheritage to Sustainable Development: Strategies and Perspectives in the Beigua Geopark (Italy) M. Burlando et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0019-4
61. The role of geomorphosites in the local economy development of the Carpathian and Sub-Carpathi- an area of Vrancea County, Romania I. Tufănoiu https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2023-0008
62. THE HOPE PRESERVATION OF GEODIVERSITY AND CULTURE OF MERANGIN JAMBI FOR GEOTOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN AIR BATU VILLAGE M. Hadian https://doi.org/10.25299/jurps.2024.14997
63. Analysis of the geotouristic potential of geosites in Divjakë-Karavasta National Park, Albania E. Braholli & J. Dhimitri https://doi.org/10.2478/logos-2022-0011
64. Preliminary geosite assessment model (gam) and its application on Fruška gora mountain, potential geotourism destination of Serbia M. D. Vujičić et al. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS51303
65. Impact of different roughness coefficients applied to relief diversity evaluation: Chełmno Lakeland (Polish Lowland) R. Kot & K. Leśniak https://doi.org/10.1080/04353676.2017.1286547
66. Visual perception of changes in a high mountain landscape: the case of the retreat of the Évettes Glacier (Haute-Maurienne, northern French Alps) M. Moreau https://doi.org/10.4000/geomorphologie.7901
67. Akarsu Çökellerinde Gelişen Peribacalarının Jeomorfoturizm Açısından Değerlendirilmesi: Uşak-Eşme Örneği / Evaluation of Fairy Chimneys Developed in Fluvial Deposits in Terms of Geomorphotourism: The Uşak–Eşme Case S. Dönmez https://doi.org/10.25288/tjb.1809902
68. Geoheritage of the volcanic landscapes of Foumbot-Kouomboum region, Noun Plain, Cameroon: Geomorphological features and assessment of geomorphosites L. Ziem A Bidias et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2023.08.002
69. Canyons as potential geotourism attractions of Central High Atlas, Morocco: Comparative analysis of Aït Bouguemaz Valley and Zaouiat Ahansal-Taghia Valley by using GAM model A. Elkaichi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2024.01.001
70. Educational values and services of ecosystems and landscapes – An overview E. Mocior & M. Kruse https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.031
71. Geoethics supporting geotourism modelling: Assessing karst geosites and management practices in Serbia and Montenegro A. Antić et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2026.02.005
72. Geodiversidade na educação básica T. Furtado & J. Valdati https://doi.org/10.5902/2236499472139
73. Assessing speleoarcheological geoheritage: Linking new Paleolithic discoveries and potential cave tourism destinations in Serbia A. Antić et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.05.002
74. Malta and Sicily Joined by Geoheritage Enhancement and Geotourism within the Framework of Land Management and Development C. Cappadonia et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8070253
75. Inventory and assessment of geoarchaeosites in the Middle Eure Valley (Paris Basin, France): An integrated approach to geoarchaeological heritage T. Piau et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2023.05.003
76. O Inventário e Avaliação Quantitativa de Sítios de Geodiversidade na Bacia do Recôncavo, Brasil. G. Seabra et al. https://doi.org/10.26848/rbgf.v19.02.p1052-1072
77. Geosites and Climate Change—A Review and Conceptual Framework P. Migoń https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14060153
78. Tam Hai – an important complex geosite of the coastal zone in Quang Nam province, Vietnam H. Chi et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1170/1/012029
79. Evaluation of Granite Topography in the Ida Madra Geopark in the Context of Geoheritage R. Efe et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-026-01292-9
80. Aeolization on the Atlantic coast of Galicia (NW Spain) from the end of the last glacial period to the present day: Chronology, origin and evolution of coastal dunes linked to sea‐level oscillations C. Arce Chamorro et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5481
81. Geoheritage of tropical regions: An overview A. Quesada-Román et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2025.05.004
82. A Comprehensive Review on Geoheritage Site of the Northwest Himalaya: a Special Emphasis on of Geological Significance, Conservation, and Geotourism Potential V. Chufal et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-026-01320-8
83. Geosites assessment in a volcanic hotspot environment and its impact on geotourism, Santa Cruz-Galapagos Islands, Ecuador P. Carrión-Mero et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2024.01.006
84. Geosites in Orava, Liptov and Spiš (N Slovakia) – evaluation, accessibility and geotouristic potential A. Chrobak-Žuffová et al. https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2025-0027
85. Three Landscape-Dominating Mountains of the Western Caucasus: Case Studies of Local Heritage and Cultural Inferences A. Mikhailenko et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7080199
86. The Role of Anthropogenic Landforms in Sustainable Landscape Management L. Kubalikova et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164331
87. A Contribution to the Understanding of the Apennine Landscapes: the Potential Role of Molise Geosites F. Filocamo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00365-2
88. A new approach to enhance the appeal of the Italian territory through art: three study cases from Marche Region L. Valentini & O. Nesci https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06415-2
89. Promoting geo-education and geotourism through geosite assessment: A case study from Acheron-Parga, Epirus, Greece E. Spyrou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2024.04.003
90. Geotourism and Interpretation of Geomorphology in Mountain Tourism J. Bussard & E. Reynard https://doi.org/10.4000/rga.10298
91. From geoheritage inventory to territorial planning tool in the Vercors massif (French Alps): Contribution of statistical and expert cross approaches A. Poiraud et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.04.012
92. From landslide characterization to nature reserve management: The “Scialimata Grande di Torre Alfina” landslide Geosite (Central Apennines, Italy) G. Tronti et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-022-7596-y
93. Géopatrimoine et biopatrimoine, à la croisée entre conservation et développement. Une approche des trajectoires patrimoniales dans le Cariri du Ceará (Nordeste brésilien) F. Bétard et al. https://doi.org/10.3917/ag.717.0544
94. Ephemeral geomorphodiversity: Conceptual debate, valuation, and heritage management J. Bedoya et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109569
95. İhsaniye (Afyonkarahisar) İlçesi Jeomorfosit ve Kültürel Sitler Envanteri M. Özdemir & H. Kaymak https://doi.org/10.46453/jader.1358641
96. Exploring the potential for development of geotourism in Rarh Bengal, Eastern India using M-GAM M. Mahato & N. Jana https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2021.05.002
97. Assessment of Geoheritage and Geotoursim Potential of the Geoarchaeosites from the Mainland Gujarat, Western India A. Das et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00768-8
98. Comparative analysis of Devil's town and Bryce canyon geosites by applying the modified geosite assessment model (M-GAM) V. Jonić https://doi.org/10.5937/ZbDght1802113J
99. Geotourism site suitability assessment by a novel GIS-based MCDM method in the Eastern Duars region (Himalayan foothill) of West Bengal, India N. Islam et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05959-7
100. Geoheritage sites in the territorial unit "North of the Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohija" D. Petrović https://doi.org/10.5937/bnsr16-64387
101. Geosite and Geomorphosite Assessment as a Tool for Geoconservation and Geotourism Purposes: a Case Study from Vizovická vrchovina Highland (Eastern Part of the Czech Republic) L. Kubalíková & K. Kirchner https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-015-0143-2
102. Geoheritage in Deltaic Environments: Classification Notes, Case Example, and Geopark Implication A. Mikhailenko & D. Ruban https://doi.org/10.3390/environments6020018
103. Geoheritage Values and Environmental Issues of Derelict Mines: Examples from the Sulfide Mines of Gromolo and Petronio Valleys (Eastern Liguria, Italy) P. Marescotti et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/min8060229
104. Palaeovolcanic Geoheritage from Volcano Geology Perspective within Earth's Geosystems: Geoeducation of the Potential Geopark Kratovo-Zletovo (North Macedonia) B. Aleksova et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-024-00960-y
105. Some Comments to Geosite Assessment, Visitors, and Geotourism Sustainability Ľ. Štrba et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082589
106. Bringing geoheritage underwater: definitions, methods, and application in two Mediterranean marine areas A. Rovere et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0824-8
107. Speleological approach for geotourism development in Zlatibor county (West Serbia) S. Vuković & A. Antić https://doi.org/10.5937/turizam23-21325
108. Urban geoheritage and degradation risk assessment of the Sokograd fortress (Sokobanja, Eastern Serbia) M. Marjanović et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2022-0681
109. How to Create a Geocultural Site’s Content–Huta Różaniecka Case Study (SE Poland) E. Skowronek et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16052193
110. Inventory and Assessment of the Mbepit Massif Geomorphosites (Cameroon Volcanic Line): Assets for the Development of Local Geotourism L. Ziem à Bidias et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00471-6
111. Proposal of a Quantitative Assessment Method for Viewpoint Geosites M. Diniz & I. de Araújo https://doi.org/10.3390/resources11120115
112. The Relevance of the South American Nevados for Geoheritage G. Pessoa & V. Steinke https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-023-00826-9
113. Anthropic Vulnerability of a Hydrothermal Mineral Deposit and Related Mining Heritage, a Case Study from a Medieval Gold-Silver Mining Area, Telkibánya, Hungary J. Szepesi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-023-00853-6
114. Inventory, Evaluation, and Mapping of the Geological and Geomorphological Sites of the Tazekka National Park (Middle Eastern Atlas, Morocco) A. Hili et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-024-00948-8
115. Geological heritage of the Taguelft syncline (M'Goun Geopark): Inventory, assessment, and promotion for geotourism development (Central High Atlas, Morocco) E. Louz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.04.002
116. Assessment of paleontological geosites of Uberaba UNESCO Global Geopark (Minas Gerais, Brazil) J. Cavalcanti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2026.100280
117. Kalymnos Island, SE Aegean Sea: From Fishing Sponges and Rock Climbing to Geotourism Perspective G. Zafeiropoulos & H. Drinia https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4040175
118. The Geoheritage of the South-Eastern Frontal Zone of the Middle Atlas (Morocco): First Inventory and Assessment K. Ech-charay et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00736-2
119. Comparison of Expert Assessment of Geosites with Tourist Preferences, Case Study: Sub-Tatra Region (Southern Poland, Northern Slovakia) A. Chrobak-Žuffová https://doi.org/10.3390/resources12020025
120. A Comprehensive Assessment of Geomorphodiversity and Geomorphological Heritage for Damavand Volcano Management, Iran A. Moradi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00551-1
121. Temporal scale imbrication and its importance for interpretation in geocultural sites in Jebel Dahar (Southeast Tunisia) T. Ben Fraj et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2023.09.001
122. The Scenic Beauty of Geosites and Its Relation to Their Scientific Value and Geoscience Knowledge of Tourists: A Case Study from Southeastern Spain G. Tessema et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10050460
123. The Proposed Geosite of Volano Landslide and a Geomorphological Itinerary Within the Valdelsa Basin (Montespertoli, Tuscany, Italy) S. Tognaccini https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00392-z
124. The geoheritage of Lubango-Tundavala road traverse in the Serra da Leba (SW Angola): Outcrops characterization and numerical assessment for outdoor educational activities and geoconservation purpose F. Lopes et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2019.05.018
125. Geological Heritage of Syros Island, Cyclades Complex, Greece: An Assessment and Geotourism Perspectives H. Drinia et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11030138
126. An Assessment of Geosites and Geomorphosites in the Lut Desert of Shahdad Region for Potential Geotourism Development R. Raeisi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11050736
127. Landslide-geomorphosite assessment in the Dolomites (Italy): Application of a newly implemented method C. Morino et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.109844
128. Geomorphosite Assessment in the Proposed Geopark Vistula River Gap (E Poland) J. Warowna et al. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2014-0040
129. The Geoheritage Value of Chernozem Soils (Black Soils) and Their Equivalents from the Thick Loess Sections in the Vojvodina Region, Northern Serbia S. Marković et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-024-01057-2
130. Localisation et caractérisation semi-automatique des géomorphosites fluviaux potentiels. Exemples d’applications à partir d’outils géomatiques dans le bassin de la Drôme (France) E. Wiederkehr et al. https://doi.org/10.4000/geomorphologie.7912
131. Bayesian Belief Network for Assessing Conservation and Tourism Development in UNESCO Geoparks K. Dang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-025-01083-8
132. Examining the Spatial Variability of Geosite Assessment and Its Relevance in Geosite Management M. Pál & G. Albert https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00528-6
133. Georutas o itinerarios geológicos: un modelo de geoturismo en el Complejo Volcánico Glaciar Ruiz-Tolima, Cordillera Central de Colombia M. Tavera Escobar et al. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcdg.v26n2.59277
134. Geoheritage Assessment and Potential Geotouristic Enhancement in Mountain Environments: a Test-Site in the Northern Apennines (Italy) V. Guerra & M. Lazzari https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00729-1
135. Geomorphosite Assessment of Wadi Al Disha: from the Perspective of Geotourism Development in a Canyon S. Sen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-025-01176-4
136. Digital Tools for Collection, Promotion and Visualisation of Geoscientific Data: Case Study of Seguret Valley (Piemonte, NW Italy) L. Ghiraldi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0115-y
137. Geoheritage site Tubića cave (SW Serbia): Main characteristics, valuation, categorization and geoconservation N. Tubić & D. Lukić https://doi.org/10.5937/bnhmb2417071L
138. Geosites Inventory in Liguria Region (Northern Italy): A Tool for Regional Geoconservation and Environmental Management A. Ferrando et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042346
139. Geomorphological Heritage of the Pyrenees National Park (France): Assessment, Clustering, and Promotion of Geomorphosites T. Feuillet & E. Sourp https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0020-y
140. Divergence in natural diversity studies: The need to standardize methods and goals J. Ibáñez & E. Brevik https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104110
141. From geoheritage inventory to geoeducation and geotourism implications: Insight from Jbel Amsittene (Essaouira province, Morocco) T. Arrad et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2019.103656
142. Mining Landforms: An Integrated Approach for Assessing the Geotourism and Geoeducational Potential L. Kubalíková https://doi.org/10.1515/cjot-2017-0007
143. Perception of geological and cultural heritage to promote geotourism and geoconservation in Tinjdad, southeastern Morocco S. Elfaiz et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42990-025-00208-z
144. Multisensoryczność krajobrazu jako inspiracja w kreowaniu produktu turystycznego M. Rogowski https://doi.org/10.18778/0867-5856.26.2.03
145. Geotourism: A Systematic Literature Review R. Ólafsdóttir & E. Tverijonaite https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8070234
146. The Multi-sensory landscape as an inspiration in the creation of a tourism product M. Rogowski https://doi.org/10.1515/tour-2016-0010
147. Geomorphological heritage inventory of Irazú Volcano, Costa Rica D. Pérez-Umaña et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2019.12.001
148. Assessment of Resources for Geotourism Development: Integrated SWARA-COBRA Approach Under Spherical Fuzzy Environments K. Zorlu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-024-00993-3
149. Erosion, Culture and Geoheritage; the Case of Santo Domingo Yanhuitlán, Oaxaca, México J. Palacio-Prieto et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-016-0175-2
150. Geosite assessments: comparison of methods and results L. Štrba et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2014.882885
151. Geodiversity Assessment of French Guiana: Challenges and Implications for Sustainable Land Planning O. Scammacca et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00716-6
152. Enhancing Geotourism Potential: Assessing and Presenting a Tourism Development Strategy for Takht-e Soleiman Region, West Azerbaijan Province – Iran M. Hosseinzadeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-025-01259-2
153. Cave tourism in Switzerland: The assessment and implications for subterranean geoheritage sustainability A. Antić et al. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2025-0003
154. Assessment of Geosites within a Natural Protected Area: A Case Study of Cajas National Park E. Navarrete et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14053120
155. How to assess the value of geological heritage? S. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.14770/jgsk.2016.52.5.539
156. Reflecting Experiences of Regional Academic, Tourism, and Education Specialists in Geoheritage Evaluation for Fujairah, UAE and Southeast Arabia K. Sayama et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-024-00995-1
157. Landslides, a Key Landform in the Global Geological Heritage C. Morino et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.864760
158. How to Integrate Invisible Geomorphosites in an Inventory: a Case Study in the Rhone River Valley (Switzerland) M. Clivaz & E. Reynard https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0222-7
159. Geomorphological Heritage on the North Coast of the State of São Paulo: A Perspective About Current and Past Climate Changes E. Mazzucato et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00756-y
160. The Iberian Massif Landscape and Fluvial Network in Portugal: a geoheritage inventory based on the scientific value D. Pereira et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pgeola.2015.01.003
161. Evaluating Geomorphosites and the Geomorphological Hazards that Impact them: Case Study—Cozia Massif (Southern Carpathians, Romania) A. Ovreiu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00352-7
162. Yapraklı Bazalt Sütunları’nın (Siverek) Jeomiras Açısından İncelenmesi A. Aytaç et al. https://doi.org/10.46453/jader.1729228
163. Tree rings as ecological indicator of geomorphic activity in geoheritage studies I. Bollati et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.053
164. Advanced Technologies for Geosite Visualization and Valorization: A Review F. Pasquaré Mariotto et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095598
165. Quantitative assessment of the geomorphological heritage of the Pedra da Boca State Park's surroundings: Key geoheritage site in Northeast Brazil H. da Costa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2023.07.001
166. The Integrated Assessment of Degraded Tourist Geomorphosites to Develop Sustainable Tourism: A Case Study of Grădina Zmeilor Geomorphosite, North-West Region, Romania P. Codrea et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199816
167. Geoheritage Resilience Assessment for Geoconservation Planning in Lorestan Province, Iran F. Moradipour et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-023-00909-7
168. Conservation of World Heritage glacial landscapes in a changing climate: The Swiss Alps Jungfrau-Aletsch case J. Bussard & E. Reynard https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2023.06.003
169. A multi-criteria decision analysis with special reference to loess and archaeological sites in Serbia (Could geosciences and archaeology cohabitate?) M. Vujičić et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2018-0026
170. L’analyse intégrée du relief et la sélection déductive des géomorphosites : application à la Charente-Maritime (France) D. Sellier https://doi.org/10.4000/geomorphologie.7931
171. An Assessment of Gorges for Purposes of Identifying Geomorphosites of Geotourism Value in the Apuseni Mountains (Romania) G. Cocean & P. Cocean https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-016-0180-5
172. Science, poetry, and music for landscapes of the Marche region, Italy: communicating the conservation of natural heritage O. Nesci & L. Valentini https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-393-2020
173. Geoheritage, Geotourism and the Cultural Landscape: Enhancing the Visitor Experience and Promoting Geoconservation J. Gordon https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8040136
174. Enhancing the Geological Heritage of the Errachidia Area in the High Atlas, Morocco: Inventory and a Proposal for a Pedagogic and Geotouristic Trail H. Si Mhamdi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-023-00813-0
175. The Geoheritage of Mount Ararat and its Vicinity: An Assessment of Geodiversity with a Focus on Glaciation and Mountaineering E. Canpolat et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-026-01269-8
176. Comparative study of quantitative assessment of the geomorphological heritage of the coastal zone of Icapuí - Ceará, Brazil M. Diniz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.02.006
177. Trajectoires culturelles des géomorphosites ou comment rendre visible le « relief-géogramme » C. Portal https://doi.org/10.4000/geocarrefour.8816
178. Geosite Assessment for Geotourism Purposes: Case Study of Ida Madra Geopark, Türkiye R. Efe et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-026-01278-7
179. Coastal Dunes Geomorphosites to Develop the Geotourism in a Volcanic Subtropical Oceanic Island, Tenerife, Spain N. Marrero-Rodríguez & J. Dóniz-Páez https://doi.org/10.3390/land11030426
180. Canyoning and geotourism: Assessing geosites for canyoning activities in Western Serbia N. Tomić et al. https://doi.org/10.5937/turizam25-27524
181. The Development of Geotourism in the Akhlamed Valley in Eastern Iran Through the Evaluation of Geomorphosites M. Tavangar & A. Forghani https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20251401.11
182. Glacial geomorphosites in the Greater Himalayan and Pir Panjal Ranges of the Kashmir Valley: Inventory, classification, and geotourism potential K. Murtaza et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.109895
183. Geodiversity and geoheritage: Detecting scientific and geographic biases and gaps through a bibliometric study J. Ibáñez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.443
184. Geosites in the Gole della Breggia Geopark, Ticino, Southern Switzerland P. Oppizzi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources12100122
185. The Geomorphology and Landscape of the Ionian Islands: An Inventory of Geomorphosites E. Spyrou & N. Evelpidou https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-025-01082-9
186. Inventory and assessment of geomorphosites for geotourism development: A case study of Aït Bou Oulli valley (Central High‐Atlas, Morocco) H. Bouzekraoui et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12380
187. Contribution to the Assessment of Geomorphosites in the Czech Republic (a Case Study of the North-eastern Part of the Novohradské Mountains) J. Rypl et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-018-0293-0
188. Еvaluation of fossil sites for the purposes of geotourism in Bulgaria D. Sinnyovsky https://doi.org/10.52215/rev.bgs.2023.84.2.3
189. Optimisation of the geobiodiversity index for protected natural areas in northern Portugal A. Vieira et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.109970
190. Saline Soils: A Potentially Significant Geoheritage of the Vojvodina Region, Northern Serbia T. Zeremski et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147891
191. Selection of geomorphosites in the Rondane National Park (central Norway): landforms and popularization R. Kerguillec & D. Sellier https://doi.org/10.4000/geomorphologie.11012
192. Anthropic Valorisation of Vulnerable Areas Affected by Deep-Seated Landslides P. Cocean et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00397-8
193. Geoheritage and Cultural Heritage—A Review of Recurrent and Interlinked Themes E. Pijet-Migoń & P. Migoń https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12020098
194. Potensi Geosite Kawasan Gunung Penanggungan, Kabupaten Mojokerto, Jawa Timur Sebagai Landasan Penentuan Kawasan Geokonservasi B. Purnomo Putra et al. https://doi.org/10.14710/jgt.7.2.2024.143-164
195. Preliminary Assessment of Hydrological Heritage in North Macedonia: A Novel Contribution to Geodiversity Protection B. Aleksova et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-025-01098-1
196. Attractiveness of Central Public Spaces in Small Polish Towns Based on a Spatial Order Analysis W. Kamińska & M. Mularczyk https://doi.org/10.3390/land10121327
197. Geoheritage assessment based on large-scale geomorphological mapping: contributes from a Portuguese limestone massif example M. Rodrigues & A. Fonseca https://doi.org/10.4000/geomorphologie.7924
198. Geomorphological and hydrological heritage of Mt. Stara Planina in SE Serbia: From river protection initiative to potential geotouristic destination M. Marjanović et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2022-0340
199. Geotourism Potential of the Drawskie Lake District as a Support for the Planned Geopark named Postglacial Land of the Drawa and Dębnica Rivers M. Górska-Zabielska & K. Kamieńska https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2017-0002
200. Quantitative Assessment as an Innovative Tool for Geoheritage Management in the Golija Nature Park D. Petrović et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-025-01237-8
201. A Step towards a Sustainable Tourism in Apennine Mountain Areas: A Proposal of Geoitinerary across the Matese Mountains (Central-Southern Italy) F. Filocamo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12020100
202. Speleological objects becoming show caves: evidence from the Valjevo karst area in Western Serbia A. Antić et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00517-9
203. Coastal Geoheritage and Sustainability: A Study in the Low Coast of Costa Branca, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil F. da Silva et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156709
204. Thousands of Potholes in the Mekong River and Giant Pedestal Rock from North-eastern Thailand: Introduction to a Future Geological Heritage Site S. Udomsak et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00524-w
205. Updating the Inventory of Geosites in the Mixteca Alta UNESCO Global Geopark Through the Application of Participatory Strategies J. Sánchez-Cortez et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-025-01120-6
206. Geosite assessment as a contribution to the sustainable development of Babušnica, Serbia M. Cvetanović et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2022-0644
207. The Specificities of Geomorphosites and Their Influence on Assessment Procedures: a Methodological Comparison D. Santos et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00411-z
208. Tourist Value Assessment of Geotourism and Environmental Capabilities in Qeshm Island, Iran A. Pourahmad et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0273-9
209. Developing the Cultural Route Evaluation Model (CREM) and its application on the Trail of Roman Emperors, Serbia S. Božić & N. Tomić https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2015.11.002
210. The Unique Granite Gorge in Mountainous Adygeya, Russia: Evidence of Big and Complex Geosite Disproportions A. Mikhailenko et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9090372
211. Geoheritage Potential of Miliolite Formation of the Southern Saurashtra (Western India), Gujarat S. Prizomwala et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00761-1
212. An Appraisal of Evolution Stage and Degradation Risk of Geomorphosites Using TALC and DRA in Ajodhya Hill of the Eastern Chota Nagpur Plateau, India U. Mandal et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-024-00966-6
213. Geoheritage Conservation: Systematic Mapping Study for Conceptual Synthesis B. Németh et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00561-z
214. How Can a Complex Geosite Be Enhanced? A Landscape-Scale Approach to the Deep-Seated Gravitational Slope Deformation of Pointe Leysser (Aosta Valley, NW Italy) M. Forno et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00730-8
215. Assessment of Geological Heritage Sites and Their Significance for Geotouristic Exploitation: The Case of Lefkas, Meganisi, Kefalonia and Ithaki Islands, Ionian Sea, Greece E. Spyrou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12020055
216. Bridging Terrestrial and Marine Geoheritage: Assessing Geosites in Portofino Natural Park (Italy) P. Coratza et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11102112
217. Effectiveness of the Geoeducational Assessment Method (GEOAM) in Unveiling Geoeducational Potential: A Case Study of Samos G. Zafeiropoulos & H. Drinia https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13110336
218. Geotourism Potentials of Geosites in Durrës Municipality, Albania E. Braholli & E. Menkshi https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2021-0005
219. Yazılıkaya (Eskişehir) Jeomorfositlerinin Değerlendirilmesi M. Özdemir & H. Kaymak https://doi.org/10.17123/atad.1545046
220. Distinctive Neoproterozoic Landforms of Northwestern India: Tectono-Magmatic Evolution, Geosite Significance, and Geotourism Potential M. Pandit et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-026-01390-8
221. Durağan'ın (Sinop) Jeoturizm Açısından Değerlendirilmesi H. BAĞCI & S. KARADURAK https://doi.org/10.46453/jader.982078
222. Overlooked Geomorphological Component of Volcanic Geoheritage—Diversity and Perspectives for Tourism Industry, Pogórze Kaczawskie Region, SW Poland P. Migoń & E. Pijet-Migoń https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-015-0166-8
223. M-GAM method in function of tourism potential assessment: Case study of the Sokobanja basin in eastern Serbia M. Bratić et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2020-0116
224. The evaluation of geoheritage for geotourism development: Case study on the potential Geopark Djerdap M. Belij et al. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrgfub1802121B
225. The point bonitation method for evaluating geodiversity: a guide with examples (polish lowland) R. Kot https://doi.org/10.1111/geoa.12079
226. Geoheritage of the Gua Ikan Karst Complex (GIKC), Stong Geopark, Dabong, Kuala Krai District, Kelantan, Malaysia: Evaluation for Geotourism Opportunities H. Mansor et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202413104018
227. Methodological guidelines for geomorphosite assessment P. Pereira & D. Pereira https://doi.org/10.4000/geomorphologie.7942
228. A Proposed Geoheritage Inventory System: Case Study of Isalo National Park, Madagascar H. Randrianaly et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2016.45016
229. The Assessment of Hydrogeosites in the Fann Mountains, Tajikistan as a Basis for Sustainable Tourism K. Pukowiec-Kurda et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10120126
230. Evaluation of Tourism Status in Sustainable Rural Development by Reynard Model (Case Study: Pa Ghaleh Village, Mamasani County, Iran) A. Shamsoddini https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2015.53008
231. A Field Method for Landscape Conservation Surveying: The Landscape Assessment Protocol (LAP) V. Vlami et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072019
232. Promoting Geoheritage in the Aspiring Geopark of Taburno-Camposauro (Southern Apennines, Italy) with Innovative Tools P. Palazzo & A. Valente https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14120317
233. Geodiversity and Geomorphosite Assessment Applied to a Natural Protected Area: the Ebro and Rudron Gorges Natural Park (Spain) R. Pellitero et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0022-9
234. Rapid assessment of coastal underwater spots for their use as recreational scuba diving sites A. Flores-de la Hoya et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.11.005
235. Karst geoheritage and geotourism potential in the Pek River lower basin (eastern Serbia) A. Antić et al. https://doi.org/10.5937/gp23-20463
236. Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of the “El Sexmo” Tourist Gold Mine (Zaruma, Ecuador) as A Geosite and Mining Site P. Carrión-Mero et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9030028
237. Geoheritage as a Tool for Environmental Management: A Case Study in Northern Malta (Central Mediterranean Sea) L. Selmi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8040168
238. Sandstone rock outcrops in the Outer Eastern Carpathians in Ukraine: Assessment of geotourism potential by the GAM and Brilha methods B. Yulian et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2023.03.002
239. Relationship Between Natural Hazards and Geological Heritage: the Case of Cretaccio Island (Tremiti Archipelago, Southern Italy) R. Pagliarulo https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0108-x
240. The role of geodiversity and geoheritage in tourism and local development P. Migoń & E. Pijet-Migoń https://doi.org/10.1144/SP530-2022-115
241. Exploring the Geoheritage of Salvador’s Seafront: Tectonic History and Geotourism Potential N. Barbosa et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-025-01075-8
242. The canyon of Haidamatskyi Iar in the village of Busha: Geotourism assessment Y. Braychevskyy et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2025.02.007
243. GECAS: A Modular, Non-Compensatory Alphanumeric Framework for Geosite and Geomorphosite Evaluation and Classification S. Spoto https://doi.org/10.3390/quat9030045
244. Las cataratas del Lobé, un patrimonio geocultural excepcional en la costa camerunesa, entre el turismo duradero y la conservación de las identidades culturales M. Tchindjang et al. https://doi.org/10.4000/viatourism.958
245. Between Meteorite, Glacier and Rivers—Towards Geotourism Development in Diverse Landscape D. Abramowicz & R. Tritt https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188119
246. Loess Geoheritage and Geohazard Protective Measures at Luochuan Loess National Geopark in NW China G. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00354-5
247. Geomorphosites Assessment Methods: Comparative Analysis and Typology V. Mucivuna et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00394-x
248. Identification of Geoheritage Elements in a Cultural Landscape: a Case Study from Tokaj Mts, Hungary J. Szepesi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00516-w
249. Customer-Oriented Evaluation of Geoheritage—on the Example of Volcanic Geosites in the West Sudetes, SW Poland M. Różycka & P. Migoń https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0217-4
250. Les paysages géomorphologiques du Haut Atlas central (Maroc) : potentiel éducatif et éléments pour la médiation scientifique J. Bussard et al. https://doi.org/10.4000/geomorphologie.17103
251. The evaluation of geosites in the territory of National park „Kopaonik“(Serbia) D. Vukoičić et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2018-0049
252. Comparing Methods of Evaluation of Geosites: The Fossiliferous Outcrops of Santa Maria Island (Azores, NE Atlantic) as a Case Study for Sustainable Island Tourism V. Raposo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103596
253. Comparative Analysis of Two Assessment Methods for the Geoeducational Values of Geosites: A Case Study from the Volcanic Island of Nisyros, SE Aegean Sea, Greece G. Zafeiropoulos & H. Drinia https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12020082
254. Assessing Geosites for Geotourism Development: Case Studies from the Southern Part of Sri Lanka D. Sumanapala et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00608-1
255. Geoheritage of the Iconic EN280 Leba Road (Huila Plateau, Southwestern Angola): Inventory, Geological Characterization and Quantitative Assessment for Outdoor Educational Activities F. Lopes et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13081293
256. Iceland, an Open-Air Museum for Geoheritage and Earth Science Communication Purposes F. Pasquaré Mariotto et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9020014
257. De la géoconservation au géotourisme : un glissement de paradigme A. Poiraud & G. Dandurand https://doi.org/10.3917/ag.717.0625
258. Comparing quantitative methods on the evaluation of scientific value in geosites: analysis from the Itatiaia National Park, Brazil V. Mucivuna et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107988
259. Geosite Kahuripan Evaluation as Gili Genting Potential Asset for Archipelagic Geotourism Development D. Syafitri et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1406/1/012004
260. “Perugia Upside-Down”: A Multimedia Exhibition in Umbria (Central Italy) for Improving Geoheritage and Geotourism in Urban Areas L. Melelli https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8030148
261. Assessment of Geosites in Northern Morocco: Diversity and Richness with Potential for Socioeconomic Development A. Salhi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00512-0
262. Sustainable Development and Evaluation of Natural Heritage in Protected Areas: The Case of Golija Nature Park, Serbia D. Petrović et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/earth6040153
263. The Lobé Waterfall, an exceptional geocultural heritage on the coast of cameroon between sustainable tourism and the conservation of cultural identities M. Tchindjang & M. Etoga https://doi.org/10.4000/viatourism.964
264. Urban geotourism development in the perspective of stakeholders M. Hadian et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2024.12.001
265. Analysis of quantitative methods for geodiversity in Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil R. Torlay et al. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1982-21702022000300014
266. Application of SWOT-TOWS Matrix and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in the Formulation of Geoconservation and Geotourism Development Strategies for Mama Bhagne Pahar: an Important Geomorphosite in West Bengal, India K. Datta https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00467-2
267. Assessment of Geosite and Geotourism Potential of Baskil District (Elazığ) Using Preliminary Geosite Assessment Model (GAM) Y. Göktaş et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-025-01217-y
268. Using Interactive Multi-Media Panorama Virtual Reality to Balance Heritage Science, Education and Conservation At Zhoukoudian, Fangshan UNESCO Global Geopark J. Qiu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-025-01141-1
269. Educational Potential Assessment of Geodiversity Sites: a Proposal and a Case Study in the Basque Country (Spain) J. Sanz et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00432-z
270. Virtual Geosite Communication through a WebGIS Platform: A Case Study from Santorini Island (Greece) F. Pasquaré Mariotto et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125466
271. Altınordu (Ordu) İlçesindeki Jeosit ve Jeomorfositlerin Turizm Potansiyellerinin “Preliminary Geosite Assessment Model (GAM)” ile Ölçümü Ş. HATİPOĞLU & M. BAHADIR https://doi.org/10.18795/gumusmaviatlas.790874
272. Jbel Irhoud Geosite, the Cradle of Humanity (Youssoufia Province, Marrakech-Safi region, Morocco): Evaluation and Valorization of the Geological Heritage for Geoeducation and Geotourism Purposes M. Hamidy et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-024-00927-z
273. Inventory and Assessment of Geosites from the Broader Area of Eleftheri-Livadari, Epirus, Greece E. Spyrou https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-026-01326-2
274. Inventory and Quantitative Assessment of Geosites in the Southern Sector of the Island of Malta M. Possenelli et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14110292
275. Geolandscapes of the Ciucaș Mountains (Eastern Carpathians, Romania) - the assessment of geomorphosites and development of geotourism L. Comănescu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.109753
276. Bojan Erhartič's contribution to geography A. Smrekar et al. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.3633
277. A Statistical Approach to the Validation and Optimisation of Geoheritage Assessment Procedures V. Bruschi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-011-0038-9
278. Geomorphosites Assessment in Karst Terrains: Anina Karst Region (Banat Mountains, Romania) L. Artugyan https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-016-0188-x
279. Assessment of Geotourism Values and Ecological Status of Mines in Kopaonik Mountain (Serbia) D. Vukoičić et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10030269
280. Integrated Approach for the Inventory and Management of Geomorphological Heritage at the Regional Scale E. Reynard et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-015-0153-0
281. GEOAM: A Holistic Assessment Tool for Unveiling the Geoeducational Potential of Geosites G. Zafeiropoulos & H. Drinia https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13070210
282. Calcerous Tufa as Invaluable Geotopes Endangered by (Over-)Tourism: A Case Study in the UNESCO Global Geopark Swabian Alb, Germany H. Megerle https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11050198
283. Water driven processes and landforms evolution rates in mountain geomorphosites: examples from Swiss Alps I. Bollati et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.07.013
284. Les chutes de la Lobé, un patrimoine géoculturel exceptionnel sur la côte camerounaise entre tourisme durable et préservation des identités culturelles M. Tchindjang & M. Etoga https://doi.org/10.4000/viatourism.951
285. Assessing Geotourism Resources on a Local Level: A Case Study from Southern Moravia (Czech Republic) L. Kubalíková https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8030150
286. Evaluation of the Visitor Understanding of Coastal Geotourism and Geoheritage Potential Based on Sustainable Regional Development in Western Black Sea Region, Turkey C. Cengiz et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111812
287. The magnitude rule in geoheritage site inventories N. Ferrer et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091333231223379
288. Life in geodiversity: focuses and challenges N. Pohorilchuk et al. https://doi.org/10.17721/phgg.2024.5-6.04
289. Quantitative Assessment of Geotopes as an Effective Tool for Geoheritage Management C. Fassoulas et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-011-0046-9
290. Geomorphological component of volcanic geoheritage of Kouoptamo, Cameroon Volcanic Line: Geoconservation and perspectives for geotourism industry L. Ziem A Bidias et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2023.06.001
291. The Po Plain Loess Basin (Northern Italy): Scientific Values, Threats, and Promotion Opportunities I. Bollati & A. Zerboni https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00596-2
292. Assessment of the visual fragility of geomorphological landscapes and geodiversity sites in the Sierras Subbéticas UNESCO Global Geopark (southern Spain) J. Martínez-Murillo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.109971
293. Geotourism is one of the important pillars of tourism, which plays an important role in the economic and social development of regions, and this issue is doubly important in border regions. Considering that one of the ways to create security in the border zone is the economic development of the region, therefore, the development of geotourism in the border zone of the country is important. Considering the importance of the issue, in this research, the effects of geotourism development in creating sustainable security in Marivan city have been analyzed. In this research, the 30-meter height digital model of SRTM, the results of interviews and library studies have been used as research data. The most important research tools are ArcGIS, Expert Choice and SPSS. Also, in this research, Comanescu models, AHP and SWOT model were used. According to the intended goals, this research has been carried out in several stages, in the first stage to identify and evaluate geosites, in the second stag M. Safari Namivandi https://doi.org/10.61186/jsaeh.11.1.7
294. The Geoheritage of Northwestern Central Morocco Area: Inventory and Quantitative Assessment of Geosites for Geoconservation, Geotourism, Geopark Purpose and the Support of Sustainable Development S. Mehdioui et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00712-w
295. Alternatif Turizme Yeni Bir Destinasyon: Örenler Kanyonu (Sandıklı - Afyonkarahisar) M. Özdemir & H. Kaymak https://doi.org/10.46453/jader.1639817
296. Advances in Geoheritage Mapping: Application to Iconic Geomorphological Examples from the Italian Landscape P. Coratza et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011538
297. Inventory and assessment of geological sites at Alto Ribeira Touristic State Park (São Paulo, Brazil): A contribution to its management P. Santos & J. Brilha https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2024.07.003
298. EarthSciencesComparativeMatrix: A Comparative Method for Geoheritage Assessment S. WHITE & G. WAKELIN‐KING https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12062
299. From Urban Geodiversity to Geoheritage: The Case of Ljubljana (Slovenia) J. Tičar et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2017-0023
300. Assessment of geosites and geotouristic routes proposal for geoheritage promotion on volcanic islands P. Carrión-Mero et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.109606
301. Palaeogeographical peculiarities of the Pabdeh Formation (Paleogene) in Iran: New evidence of global diversity-determined geological heritage T. Habibi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2017.08.006
302. Geosciences Contribution to the Via Appia Regina Viarum UNESCO World Heritage Between Beneventum and Aeclanum (Southern Italy) V. Amato et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16040160
303. Inventory and classification of geosites in the South-Central Coast of Vietnam H. Chi & H. Hai https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1349/1/012007
304. Lateral and “Vertico-Lateral” Cave Dwellings in Haddej and Guermessa: Characteristic Geocultural Heritage of Southeast Tunisia N. Boukhchim et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0251-2
305. Inventory and Assessment of the Geomorphosites in Central Cyclades, Greece: The Case of Paros and Naxos Islands N. Evelpidou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11120512
306. To Embed Geosites In An Area wıth Great Tourism Activity: A Proposal for Köyceğız, Türkiye A. Gürer et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-024-00949-7
307. Geotourism in the Cilento, Vallo di Diano and Alburni UNESCO Global Geopark (Southern Italy): The Middle Bussento Karst System E. Valente et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9050052
308. Linking Wine Culture and Geoheritage—Missing Opportunities at European UNESCO World Heritage Sites and in UNESCO Global Geoparks? A Survey of Web-Based Resources E. Pijet-Migoń & P. Migoń https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00594-4
309. Geomorphological features of the Manengouba Volcano (Cameroon Line): assets for potential geopark development G. Zangmo Tefogoum et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0109-9
310. Geoheritage of the Azrou-Khenifra Basin (Moroccan Massif Central): Inventory and Quantitative Assessment of Geosites N. Akhlidej et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-025-01182-6
311. Geotourism Strategic Plan: An Assessment of Kuwait's Geotourism Potential J. Bahzad et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-025-01203-4
312. Comment on “Geotourist values of loess geoheritage within the planned Geopark Małopolska Vistula River Gap, Poland” by J. Warowna et al. [Quaternary International, 399, 46–57] D. Ruban https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2016.01.054
313. The Pedological Component of Geodiversity and Its Influence on Ecosystems and Their Services B. Stojilković et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15030430
314. Geomorphosite Characterization Method for the Purpose of an Aspiring Geopark Application Dossier on the Example of Maritsa Cirque Complex in Geopark Rila, Rila Mountain, SW Bulgaria D. Sinnyovsky et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00451-w
315. Geoeducational Value of Quarries Located Within the Małopolska Vistula River Gap (E Poland) G. Gajek et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00395-w
316. Assessing the Geotourism Potential of the Niš City Area (Southeast Serbia) M. Marjanović et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00597-1
317. The Tourism Potential of Post-mining Heritage Sites: The Cyprus Mining Cooperation in Lefka, Cyprus B. Oktay Vehbi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00697-6
318. Geoheritage and geotourism potential of the municipality of Rožaje (northeastern Montenegro) E. Brđanin https://doi.org/10.5937/zrgfub2472073B
319. Towards Sustainable Karst-Based Geotourism of the Mount Kalafat in Southeastern Serbia A. Antić et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00651-6
320. Conservation Management of Geotourism Attractions in Tourism Destinations A. Pourfaraj et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00500-4
321. Glacial Geomorphosites and Related Landforms: A Proposal for a Dendrogeomorphological Approach and Educational Trails V. Garavaglia & M. Pelfini https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0027-4
322. The Aeterna Urbs Geomorphological Heritage (Rome, Italy) A. Pica et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-015-0150-3
323. Geodiversity Assessments and Geoconservation in the Northwest of Zagros Mountain Range, Iran: Grid and Fuzzy Method Analysis M. Ahmadi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00769-7
324. Geodiversity of Kingdom of Morocco: Tata Province geomorphosites inventory for creating a geopark project (Anti-Atlas) S. Berred et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.07.001
325. Evaluation of Geosite for Sustainable Planning and Management in Geotourism D. Suzuki & H. Takagi https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0225-4
326. Assessing the scenic quality of transgressive dune systems on volcanic islands. The case of Corralejo (Fuerteventura island, Spain) E. Pérez-Hernández et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147050
327. Combining geomorphologic, biological and accessibility values for marine natural heritage evaluation and conservation A. Rovere et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.1214
328. Geosites Inventory, Evaluation, and Thematic Georoute Proposals for Sustainable Development: Taghassa—Jebha, NW Morocco L. Ourdaras et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-025-01223-0
329. Geoconservation and Geotourism Potential of Vulnerable Rudist Fossil Geosites from SE Anatolia (Turkey) Ö. S & M. O https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00650-7
330. Virtual Geosites as Innovative Tools for Geoheritage Popularization: A Case Study from Eastern Iceland F. Pasquaré Mariotto & F. Bonali https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11040149
331. An Overview Geoheritage of AlUla, Saudi Arabia: From World Heritage Site to Potential Global Geotourism Destination S. Sen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-025-01177-3
332. Indigenous-led geocultural valorisation in the Parecis Basin: Integrating cultural values into geoheritage assessment and land management R. Sartori Peruzzo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2026.100281
333. Qualification of Caves for Educational Use and Scientific Dissemination: a Methodological Proposal D. De Stefano Menin & D. de La Corte Bacci https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-023-00789-x
334. Geotourism and Local Development Based on Geological and Mining Sites Utilization, Zaruma-Portovelo, Ecuador P. Carrión Mero et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8060205
335. Secondary Geodiversity and its Potential for Urban Geotourism: A Case Study from Brno City, Czech Republic L. Kubalíková et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2017-0024
336. Exploring the Potential for Speleotourism Development in Eastern Serbia N. Tomić et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-018-0288-x
337. Geological and Cultural Heritage in Urban Areas: Interconnections, Challenges and Opportunities M. Bentivenga et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage9070260
338. Inventory and Characterization of Geosites in Ecuador: a Review E. Berrezueta et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00619-y
339. Enhancement of Geoheritage and Development of Geotourism: Comparison and Inferences from Different Experiences of Communication through Art L. Valentini et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12070264
340. Morphological Characteristics and Geoheritage Value of the Dereiçi Travertine Terraces (Van, Türkiye) H. Sayın et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-026-01318-2
341. Geodiversity and geotourism in Greater Cairo area, Egypt: implications for geoheritage revival and sustainable development S. Kharbish et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05457-w
342. Geosite Assessment Using Three Different Methods; a Comparative Study of the Krupaja and the Žagubica Springs – Hydrological Heritage of Serbia Ð. Miljković et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2018-0015
343. Geological, Geographical and Legal Considerations for the Conservation of Unique Iron Oxide and Sulphur Flows at El Laco and Lastarria Volcanic Complexes, Central Andes, Northern Chile R. Guijón et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-011-0045-x
344. Geo-environmental cartography of the Marine Protected Area “Isola di Bergeggi” (Liguria, NW Mediterranean Sea) A. Rovere et al. https://doi.org/10.4113/jom.2010.1137
345. Geoheritage and Geotourism Resources N. Santangelo & E. Valente https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9070080
346. Reconocimiento y evaluación de posibles geositios asociados a dolinas en el departamento de Malargüe Provincia de Mendoza, Argentina V. Cortez Taillant & A. Arroqui Langer https://doi.org/10.14483/22487638.17134
347. Methodological Proposal for Assessment Geosites: its Application in Bou-Iblane Region (Middle Atlas, Morocco) K. Baadi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00476-1
348. A geomorphological approach for enhancing environmental management and conservation of landforms as protected nature objects in the Upper Daugava spillway valley E. Muižniece & J. Soms https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2015vol2.252
349. Assessment of Geomorphosites for Geotourism in the Northern Part of the “Ruta Escondida” (Quito, Ecuador) P. Carrión-Mero et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208468
350. Urban Geoheritage. The Secular Wells of Craiova, Romania C. Albă & S. Boengiu https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2020-0002
351. Paleogeography as geological heritage: Developing geosite classification D. Bruno et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.06.005
352. The Role of Cultural and Indigenous Values in Geosite Evaluations on a Quaternary Monogenetic Volcanic Landscape at Ihumātao, Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand I. Gravis et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-016-0198-8
353. “Geo-Archaeo-Routes” on the Island of Lemnos: The “Nalture” Experience as a Holistic Geotouristic Approach within the Geoethical Perspective M. Triantaphyllou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13050143
354. Health Tourism Niche and Visitors’ Particular Interests of Needs as a Factor of Rural Destination Development A. Vujko et al. https://doi.org/10.2478/ejthr-2025-0015
355. Geomorphological Landscape Assessment in the Hismah Desert: A Possible Geopark in Link with NEOM Project S. Sen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-024-00956-8
356. Assessment of Geosites and Geotouristic Sites for Mapping Geotourism: A Case Study of Al-Soudah, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia J. Al Mohaya & M. Elassal https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00774-w
357. Geoheritage and Resilience of Dallol and the Northern Danakil Depression in Ethiopia V. Vereb et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00499-8
358. Assessing the ecological value of dynamic mountain geomorphosites J. Bussard & E. Giaccone https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-385-2021
359. The Geomorphosite Assessment by Trapezoidal Bipolar Fuzzy Information-Based CRITIC-MABAC Method K. Zorlu & V. Dede https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-023-00859-0
360. Géoheritage of Rehamna Region (Morocco): Inventory and Quantitative Assessment of Geosites I. EddifaI et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-025-01231-0
361. Alpine gullies system evolution: erosion drivers and control factors. Two examples from the western Italian Alps I. Bollati et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.10.025
362. Visitation Rate Analysis of Geoheritage Features from Earth Science Education Perspective Using Automated Landform Classification and Crowdsourcing: A Geoeducation Capacity Map of the Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand B. Németh et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11110480
363. Beyond Geodiversity Sites: Exploring the Educational Potential of Widespread Geological Features (Rocks, Minerals and Fossils) P. Wolniewicz https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00557-9
364. Geomorphosites and Geotourism in the Parks of the Abruzzo Region (Central Italy) E. Miccadei et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-011-0037-x
365. Exploring the potential for geotourism development in the Danube region of Serbia N. Tomić et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2020.05.001
366. Geoheritage and Geodiversity Education in Romania: Formal and Non-Formal Analysis Based on Questionnaires L. Comănescu & A. Nedelea https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219180
367. Geosite Assessment and Communication: A Review F. Pasquaré Mariotto et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources12020029
368. The IGMM Model: A Conceptual Consideration on Geoheritage Integrated Marketing and Management Approach for Geotourism Development Ľ. ŠTRBA https://doi.org/10.46544/AMS.v30i4.07
369. Geomorphosites and Geotourism in the Kavir National Park (Central Iran) A. Yazdi et al. https://doi.org/10.12944/CWE.10.3.40
370. Landslides and Fortified Settlements as Valuable Cultural Geomorphosites and Geoheritage Sites in the Moldavian Plateau, North-Eastern Romania M. Niculiţă & M. Mărgărint https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0261-0
371. Pliocene Geotourism: Innovative Projects for Valorizing the Paleontological Heritage of Three Different-Staged Quarries of Tuscany (Central Italy) M. Merella et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-023-00838-5
372. Inventory and Evaluation of Geosites: Case Studies of the Slovak Karst as a Potential Geopark in Slovakia M. Kudla et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177783
373. The SEA and Big-S Models for Managing Geosites as Resources for Local Communities in the Context of Rural Geoparks R. Popa et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-016-0192-1
374. Assessment of glacial geoheritage by multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in the Yalnızçam Mountains, Northeastern Türkiye K. Zorlu & V. Dede https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2023.01.001
375. Applying Show Cave Assessment Model (SCAM) on Cave Tourism Destinations in Serbia A. Antić et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4195676
376. Geoheritage, Geoeducation, and Geotourism Synergies on Tinos Island (Cyclades, Greece): Assessment, Interpretation, and Sustainable Development Perspectives G. Zafeiropoulos et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14071481
377. Contribution of Geological Heritage to Geoeducation: A Case Study from Samaria Gorge and Mount Pentelicus (Marble Quarries) E. Spyrou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8020042
378. Loess and geotourism potential of the Braničevo District (NE Serbia): From overexploitation to paleoclimate interpretation A. Antić et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2022-0546
379. Quantitative Assessment of the Geosites of Chelmos-Vouraikos UNESCO Global Geopark (Greece) V. Golfinopoulos et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12020063
380. Geomorphological mapping as a tool for geoheritage inventory and geotourism promotion: a case study from the middle valley of the Marecchia River (northern Italy) V. Guerra & M. Lazzari https://doi.org/10.4000/geomorphologie.15193
381. Following the Tracks of Charlemagne in the Cottian Alps. The Cultural and Geological Heritage of the Franks Trail (Susa Valley, Piemonte, NW Italy) E. Giordano et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-015-0158-8
382. Assessment of the value and distribution of geological heritages in Chungcheong Province, Korea H. Cho et al. https://doi.org/10.14770/jgsk.2016.52.5.639
383. Granite Landscapes, Geodiversity and Geoheritage—Global Context P. Migoń https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4010012
384. Strategies to Improve the Tourist Interest of a Geosite Respecting Its Natural Heritage. A Case Study P. Carrión-Mero et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00746-0
385. Geomorfositios de interés volcano turístico en una montaña subtropical: el Parque Nacional del Teide (Canarias, España) J. Dóniz Páez & R. Becerra Ramírez https://doi.org/10.3989/pirineos.2020.175011
386. Geological and archaeological heritage in the Mediterranean coasts: Proposal and quantitative assessment of new geosites in SW Sardinia (Italy) D. Fancello et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.910990
387. Applying the Show Cave Assessment Model (SCAM) on cave tourism destinations in Serbia A. Antić et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.10.001
388. A methodological contribution to assess rock landform geomorphosites related with pareidolia: a case study in Northeast Brazil L. Queiroz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.109858
389. Integrating UAV Surveys and Geospatial Analysis for Geoheritage Evaluation: A Case Study of Markovi Kuli, North Macedonia I. Milevski et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-025-01185-3
390. Quantitative Assessments of Geodiversity in the Area of the Seridó Geopark Project, Northeast Brazil: Grid and Centroid Analysis M. da Silva et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00368-z
391. Geoheritage Assessment of a Hermit Cave System at Lakhamandal Valley, Upper Yamuna River Basin, NW Himalaya R. Devrani et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-023-00799-9
392. Exploring the Preferences of Iranian Geotourists: Case Study of Shadows Canyon and Canyon of Jinns N. Tomić et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020798
393. Geotourist values of loess geoheritage within the planned Geopark Małopolska Vistula River Gap, E Poland J. Warowna et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.06.064
394. Geomorphological Heritage Assessment and Potential Geotourism Prospects: a Case Study from Chambal River M. Resmi https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-023-00833-w
395. Geomorphosite evaluation for geotourism development using geosite assessment model (GAM): A study from a Proterozoic terrain in eastern India L. Tamang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.12.001
396. The application of the show mine assessment model on underground mining heritage and mine tourism in Switzerland A. Antić et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2025.101730
397. Geoheritage Value of Three Localities from Kislovodsk in the Southern Central Ciscaucasus: A Resource of Large Resort Area N. Yashalova & D. Ruban https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14050134
398. The Ramgarh Terrestrial Impact Structure in Rajasthan State: a ‘Geoheritage Site and Geopark’ Candidate from North-Central India M. Pandit & S. Master https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00601-8
399. Geoeducation, geotourism, and geoconservation of the Timaderouine Ediacaran-Ordovician geosites, western Tinghir (Eastern Anti-Atlas, Morocco) M. El Ouali et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2026.01.003
400. Linking Geoheritage or Geosite Assessment Results with Geotourism Potential and Development: A Literature Review Ľ. Štrba et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129539
401. An integrated glacial geosite assessment framework and its application in Montenegro: Inventory, evaluation, and prospects for geotourism S. Marković et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2025.02.008
402. Preliminary recognition of Santa Maria dell'Isola rockfalls occurred in Tropea (Calabria, Southern Italy) in April and May 2023 F. Ietto et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-023-02149-w
403. Geomorphosites of Nui Chua National Park, Ninh Thuan Province, Vietnam T. Hoang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2021.09.002
404. Assessment of geoheritage and prospects of geotourism: An approach to geoconservation of important geological and geomorphological sites of Puruliya district, West Bengal, India A. Ghosh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2021.03.001
405. Advancing Geosite Evaluation through Continuous Visitor-Centric Assessment M. Pál & G. Albert https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-025-01104-6
406. Objectivity in Geosites Inventorying and Assessment Methods E. Cameron https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-024-00938-w
407. Informed Geoheritage Conservation: Determinant Analysis Based on Bibliometric and Sustainability Indicators Using Ordination Techniques B. Németh et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10050539
408. Die Lobé-Wasserfälle, ein außergewöhnliches geokulturelles Erbe an der kamerunischen Küste zwischen nachhaltigem Tourismus und der Bewahrung kultureller Identitäten M. Tchindjang & M. Etoga https://doi.org/10.4000/viatourism.969
409. Geosite Assessment in the Beigua UNESCO Global Geopark (Liguria, Italy): A Case Study in Linking Geoheritage with Education, Tourism, and Community Involvement P. Marescotti et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101667
410. Integrating Virtual Reality and GIS Tools for Geological Mapping, Data Collection and Analysis: An Example from the Metaxa Mine, Santorini (Greece) V. Antoniou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10238317
411. Development of Geomatrix and Its Application on Geomorphosite Impact Assessment (GIA): an Innovative Approach Applied to Mama Bhagne Pahar, West Bengal, India K. Datta & S. Sarkar https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00668-x
412. Evaluation of Geo-sites in the Podrinje-Valjevo Mountains with Respect to Geo-tourism Development J. Milenković https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00567-7
413. The Mt. Catria–Mt. Nerone Ridge in the North-Marchean Apennines (Central Italy): A Potential Geopark? L. Valentini et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411382
414. Epoxy Resin for the Slope Consolidation Intervention on the Tropea Sandstone Cliff (Southern Calabria, Italy) F. Ietto et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0235-2
415. Developing a Geocultural Database of Quaternary Palaeoenvironmental Sites and Archaeological Sites in Southeast Arabia: Inventory, Endangerment Assessment, and a Roadmap for Conservation K. Sayama et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114096