14 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Fair strategies to tackle unfair risks? Justice considerations within flood risk management M. de Goër de Herve 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102745
2. A Quick-Scan Methodology Incorporating Local Knowledge for Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessments Applied in Kampala A. Polgár & L. Carton 10.1007/s12132-024-09525-2
3. Weapons of the Vulnerable? A Review of Popular Resistance to Climate Adaptation E. Brink et al. 10.2139/ssrn.4177642
4. Epistemic injustice in planning: a framework for identifying degrees of harm M. Lennon & E. Kamjou 10.1080/13549839.2024.2428218
5. Weapons of the vulnerable? A review of popular resistance to climate adaptation E. Brink et al. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102656
6. The C-word: how critical cartography, critical GIS and critical data studies can repoliticise disaster-related maps V. Carraro 10.1108/DPM-04-2023-0077
7. Resisting disaster chronopolitics: Favelas and forced displacement in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil L. Barbosa & R. Coates 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102447
8. Epistemic Injustices in Disaster Theory and Management A. García Álvarez 10.3390/philosophies9040095
9. Epistemic justice as energy justice: reflections from a transnational collaboration on hydropower and Indigenous rights S. Kelly et al. 10.1080/17565529.2024.2369608
10. Beyond Protection, toward Respect: Struggle for Environmental Justice in the Kendeng Mountains Y. Kunz et al. 10.1080/08941920.2023.2267497
11. Whose knowledge counts in nature-based solutions? Understanding epistemic justice for nature-based solutions through a multi-city comparison across Europe and Asia L. Mabon et al. 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.07.025
12. Auto/biography and mobilities in the time of climate emergency L. Pearce & N. Spurling 10.1080/17450101.2024.2393320
13. Quiet resistance speaks: A global literature review of the politics of popular resistance to climate adaptation interventions A. Vargas Falla et al. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106530
14. Introduction to the special issue “Climate and marine justice – debates and critical perspectives” A. Bercht et al. 10.5194/gh-76-305-2021