Articles | Volume 77, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-213-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-213-2022
Standard article
 | 
18 May 2022
Standard article |  | 18 May 2022

Mistranslating refuge crops: analyzing policy mobilities in the context of Indian Bt cotton production

Katharina Najork and Markus Keck

Viewed

Total article views: 868 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
664 161 43 868 50 19 21
  • HTML: 664
  • PDF: 161
  • XML: 43
  • Total: 868
  • Supplement: 50
  • BibTeX: 19
  • EndNote: 21
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 May 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 May 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 847 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 847 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 22 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
We follow the refuge crop policy adopted worldwide to delay the evolution of pest resistance in insects to genetically engineered cotton. We aim to deconstruct the prevalent narrative of accusing farmers for not complying with insect resistance management strategies as we adopt the perspectives of subaltern actors involved in the refuge policy assemblage. Methodologically, we applied a literature review, document analysis and descriptive and interpretative statistics, and cluster analysis.