Articles | Volume 77, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-267-2022
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-267-2022
Theme issue overview
 | 
14 Jun 2022
Theme issue overview |  | 14 Jun 2022

Preface: Policy mobilities – geographical perspectives on policies on the move

Susann Schäfer

Related authors

Production of knowledge on climate change perception – actors, approaches, and dimensions
Anika Zorn, Susann Schäfer, and Sophie Tzschabran
Geogr. Helv., 78, 241–253, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-241-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-241-2023, 2023
Short summary
Praxeologische Feldforschung – Reichweite, Tragweite, Importanz und Relevanz als Analysekategorien
Klaus Geiselhart, Simon Runkel, Susann Schäfer, and Benedikt Schmid
Geogr. Helv., 76, 51–63, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-51-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-51-2021, 2021
The role of organizational culture in policy mobilities – the case of South Korean climate change adaptation policies
Susann Schäfer
Geogr. Helv., 72, 341–350, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-72-341-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-72-341-2017, 2017
Short summary

Cited articles

Albrecht, M., Grundel, I., and Morales, D.: Regional bioeconomies: public finance and sustainable policy narratives, Geogr. Ann. B., 103, 116–132, https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2021.1921603, 2021. 
Andersson, I. and Grundel, I.: Regional policy mobilities: Shaping and reshaping bioeconomy policies in Varmland and Vasterbotten, Sweden, Geoforum, 121, 142–151, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.02.005, 2021. 
Baker, T., McCann, E., and Temenos, C.: Into the ordinary: non-elite actors and the mobility of harm reduction policies, Policy Soc., 39, 129–145, https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1626079, 2019. 
Bok, R.: The relational co-production of “success” and “failure,” or the politics of anxiety of exporting urban “models” elsewhere, Urban Geography, 41, 1218–1239, https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2020.1802932, 2020. 
Borén, T., Grzyś, P., and Young, C.: Intra-urban connectedness, policy mobilities and creative city-making: national conservatism vs. urban (neo)liberalism, Eur. Urban Reg. Stud., 27, 246–258, https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776420913096, 2020.