Articles | Volume 79, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-221-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-221-2024
Standard article
 | 
02 Aug 2024
Standard article |  | 02 Aug 2024

Suspended in time? Peripheralised and “left behind” places in Germany

Jeroen Royer and Tim Leibert

Viewed

Total article views: 367 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
285 62 20 367 32 8 8
  • HTML: 285
  • PDF: 62
  • XML: 20
  • Total: 367
  • Supplement: 32
  • BibTeX: 8
  • EndNote: 8
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 Aug 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 Aug 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 374 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 374 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 12 Oct 2024
Download
Short summary
The terms left behind, Abgehängte (suspended), and structurally weak have gained popularity to describe regions with increased support for right-wing populist parties in Germany and elsewhere. These concepts are not clearly defined. We give meaning to left behind places in Germany both by identifying the dimensions and varieties of left-behindness and by framing it as an outcome of peripheralisation processes.