Journal cover Journal topic
Geographica Helvetica
Journal topic

Journal metrics

CiteScore value: 1.8
CiteScore
1.8
SNIP value: 0.879
SNIP0.879
IPP value: 0.79
IPP0.79
SJR value: 0.404
SJR0.404
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 17
Scimago H
index
17
h5-index value: 13
h5-index13
Volume 70, issue 2
Geogr. Helv., 70, 109–119, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-70-109-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Geogr. Helv., 70, 109–119, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-70-109-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Standard article 08 Apr 2015

Standard article | 08 Apr 2015

Politische Geographien des Religiösen – Ambivalenzen der Verkopplung von Religion und Raum im Fall Tibet

P. Reuber P. Reuber
  • Institut für Geographie, Universität Münster, Germany

Abstract. "Religious spaces" can become a powerful nucleus of (geo-) political imaginations, identities, and conflicts. The paper outlines this aspect using the example of Tibet. Considering the prominent position of Buddhism in Tibet, the tense relationships between religion, space and nation come into view. In this respect the paper does however not primarily discuss the quite well known antagonistic constructions of pro-Chinese and pro-Tibetan geopolitical discourses. Rather, it addresses the far less publicized yet for the development of Tibetan Nationalism equally important fact that differences in the production of religious spaces and respective identities can also be found within Tibetan society. Tracing these discursive inventions of tradition helps to better understand, why the establishment of a national project in Tibet has been difficult and why it only started to gain traction and visibility in the face of mounting threads by an antagonistic exterior and the precarious Tibetan exile situation.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
“Religious spaces” can become a powerful nucleus of (geo-) political imaginations, identities, and conflicts. The paper outlines this aspect using the example of Tibet. It does however not primarily discuss the quite well known antagonistic constructions of pro-Chinese and pro-Tibetan geopolitical discourses. Rather, it addresses the differences in the production of religious spaces and identities within Tibetan society and their consequences for the development of a Tibetan national identity.
“Religious spaces” can become a powerful nucleus of (geo-) political imaginations,...
Citation