Articles | Volume 79, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-15-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-15-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Kiel 1969–2019: Die Zukunft der Geographie liegt auch in ihrer Vergangenheit
Geographisches Institut, Universität Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zürich, Schweiz
Nadine Marquardt
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Geographisches Institut, Universität Bonn, Meckenheimer Allee 166, 53115 Bonn, Deutschland
Related authors
Benedikt Korf, Ute Wardenga, Julia Verne, Boris Michel, Francis Harvey, Antje Schlottmann, and Jeannine Wintzer
Geogr. Helv., 79, 161–175, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-161-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-161-2024, 2024
Eberhard Rothfuß, Mirka Dickel, Ute Wardenga, Ulf Strohmayer, Pascal Goeke, Peter Dirksmeier, Matthew Hannah, Paloma Puente Lozano, and Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 79, 119–147, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-119-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-119-2024, 2024
Benedikt Korf, Eberhard Rothfuß, and Ute Wardenga
Geogr. Helv., 79, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-1-2024, 2024
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 78, 325–336, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-325-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-325-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, I approach German Theory as a conjunctive geography: as something that could, but did not take place. I explore the reasons why there is no German Theory (yet) by tracing the Foucault reception in German language geography and the German humanities. I study why these two variants of a
German Foucaulthave not traveled to Anglophone geography. Finally, I speculate what could have happened had the German Foucault traveled to Anglophone geography.
Benedikt Korf, Julia Verne, Jürgen Oßenbrügge, Matthew Hannah, Georg Glasze, and Annika Mattissek
Geogr. Helv., 77, 433–442, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-433-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-433-2022, 2022
Benedikt Korf, Eberhard Rothfuß, and Wolf-Dietrich Sahr
Geogr. Helv., 77, 85–96, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-85-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-85-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In diesem Editorial begründen wir die intellektuelle Agenda, die dem Themenheft «German Theory» zugrunde liegt. Um diese mit anglophonen, aber auch anderen (frankophonen, lusophonen) Theoriediskussionen ins Gespräch zu bringen, möchten wir aus der deutschsprachigen Geistesgeschichte entstandene Denkstile bewusster, autonomer, aber auch dialogischer in den Blick nehmen, in internationale Theoriedebatten einbringen, und so für eine Pluralität von Denkstilen werben.
Benedikt Korf and Ute Wardenga
Geogr. Helv., 76, 381–384, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-381-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-381-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this editorial, we introduce the special section on the politics of memory of
Kiel 1969, the famous German geographers' conference, in which, as the myth narrates, a revolution took place within the discipline of German-language geography. We introduce the three individual statements by Verne, Strohmayer and Weichhart, who all recount their entanglements with the myth of
Kiel 1969, and place them in a wider context of the history of geography.
Benedikt Korf, Maxie Bernhard, Tim Fässler, Meret Oehen, Nicola Siegrist, Livia Zeller, and Gary Seitz
Geogr. Helv., 76, 177–191, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-177-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-177-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper studies a student movement that opened up spaces for radical geography at the geography department of the University of Zurich in the early 1980s, where these students demanded a new curriculum. Building on archival material and narrative interviews, this paper documents the "thought style" of these student initiatives and illustrates the antagonistic political mood, in which these initiatives operated. This case thereby shows the precariousness of radical theory in geography.
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 74, 193–204, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-74-193-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-74-193-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This paper critically examines critical geography’s moralizing high ground. The paper makes this critique through a detour via the analyse of the critical gesture of the Greek cynics that the philosophers Foucault and Sloterdijk take to be a political practice of provocative truth-telling: For Foucault and Sloterdijk, the cynics are anti-dogmatic, anti-theoretical and anti-scholastic. I will argue, however, that the cynic is in danger of speaking from the moral high ground of an anti-critique.
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 73, 177–186, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-177-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-177-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
I critically interrogate the usefulness of the terminology of „post-secularism“ to understand the entanglement of religion and politics in multi-religious societies in the West and elsewhere. I suggest that the vocabulary of a descriptive political theology is better suited to study these dynamics and apply this conceptual vocabulary to analyse political-normative debates on Indian secularism and the everyday struggles of religious actors in the violent politics of Sri Lanka's civil war.
Benedikt Korf and Julia Verne
Geogr. Helv., 71, 365–368, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-365-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-365-2016, 2016
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 71, 215–216, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-215-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-215-2016, 2016
B. Korf
Geogr. Helv., 68, 73–75, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-73-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-73-2013, 2013
B. Korf
Geogr. Helv., 67, 227–228, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-67-227-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-67-227-2012, 2012
Benedikt Korf, Ute Wardenga, Julia Verne, Boris Michel, Francis Harvey, Antje Schlottmann, and Jeannine Wintzer
Geogr. Helv., 79, 161–175, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-161-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-161-2024, 2024
Eberhard Rothfuß, Mirka Dickel, Ute Wardenga, Ulf Strohmayer, Pascal Goeke, Peter Dirksmeier, Matthew Hannah, Paloma Puente Lozano, and Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 79, 119–147, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-119-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-119-2024, 2024
Benedikt Korf, Eberhard Rothfuß, and Ute Wardenga
Geogr. Helv., 79, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-1-2024, 2024
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 78, 325–336, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-325-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-325-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, I approach German Theory as a conjunctive geography: as something that could, but did not take place. I explore the reasons why there is no German Theory (yet) by tracing the Foucault reception in German language geography and the German humanities. I study why these two variants of a
German Foucaulthave not traveled to Anglophone geography. Finally, I speculate what could have happened had the German Foucault traveled to Anglophone geography.
Nadine Marquardt
Geogr. Helv., 78, 135–137, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-135-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-135-2023, 2023
Benedikt Korf, Julia Verne, Jürgen Oßenbrügge, Matthew Hannah, Georg Glasze, and Annika Mattissek
Geogr. Helv., 77, 433–442, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-433-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-433-2022, 2022
Nadine Marquardt
Geogr. Helv., 77, 289–295, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-289-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-289-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This intervention argues for a German carceral geography that takes the framework of abolition seriously to develop a deeper understanding and critique of the exercise of power in institutional spaces. My claim is that we need to adapt abolition as a theoretical perspective and form of knowledge that allows us to expand the analysis of carceral practices and rationalities beyond imprisonment to include other institutional spaces of racialising, classing and disabling marginalisation.
Benedikt Korf, Eberhard Rothfuß, and Wolf-Dietrich Sahr
Geogr. Helv., 77, 85–96, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-85-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-85-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In diesem Editorial begründen wir die intellektuelle Agenda, die dem Themenheft «German Theory» zugrunde liegt. Um diese mit anglophonen, aber auch anderen (frankophonen, lusophonen) Theoriediskussionen ins Gespräch zu bringen, möchten wir aus der deutschsprachigen Geistesgeschichte entstandene Denkstile bewusster, autonomer, aber auch dialogischer in den Blick nehmen, in internationale Theoriedebatten einbringen, und so für eine Pluralität von Denkstilen werben.
Benedikt Korf and Ute Wardenga
Geogr. Helv., 76, 381–384, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-381-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-381-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this editorial, we introduce the special section on the politics of memory of
Kiel 1969, the famous German geographers' conference, in which, as the myth narrates, a revolution took place within the discipline of German-language geography. We introduce the three individual statements by Verne, Strohmayer and Weichhart, who all recount their entanglements with the myth of
Kiel 1969, and place them in a wider context of the history of geography.
Benedikt Korf, Maxie Bernhard, Tim Fässler, Meret Oehen, Nicola Siegrist, Livia Zeller, and Gary Seitz
Geogr. Helv., 76, 177–191, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-177-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-177-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper studies a student movement that opened up spaces for radical geography at the geography department of the University of Zurich in the early 1980s, where these students demanded a new curriculum. Building on archival material and narrative interviews, this paper documents the "thought style" of these student initiatives and illustrates the antagonistic political mood, in which these initiatives operated. This case thereby shows the precariousness of radical theory in geography.
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 74, 193–204, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-74-193-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-74-193-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This paper critically examines critical geography’s moralizing high ground. The paper makes this critique through a detour via the analyse of the critical gesture of the Greek cynics that the philosophers Foucault and Sloterdijk take to be a political practice of provocative truth-telling: For Foucault and Sloterdijk, the cynics are anti-dogmatic, anti-theoretical and anti-scholastic. I will argue, however, that the cynic is in danger of speaking from the moral high ground of an anti-critique.
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 73, 177–186, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-177-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-177-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
I critically interrogate the usefulness of the terminology of „post-secularism“ to understand the entanglement of religion and politics in multi-religious societies in the West and elsewhere. I suggest that the vocabulary of a descriptive political theology is better suited to study these dynamics and apply this conceptual vocabulary to analyse political-normative debates on Indian secularism and the everyday struggles of religious actors in the violent politics of Sri Lanka's civil war.
Andreas Folkers and Nadine Marquardt
Geogr. Helv., 73, 79–93, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-79-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-79-2018, 2018
Benedikt Korf and Julia Verne
Geogr. Helv., 71, 365–368, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-365-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-365-2016, 2016
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 71, 215–216, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-215-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-215-2016, 2016
N. Marquardt
Geogr. Helv., 70, 175–184, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-70-175-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-70-175-2015, 2015
B. Korf
Geogr. Helv., 68, 73–75, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-73-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-73-2013, 2013
B. Korf
Geogr. Helv., 67, 227–228, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-67-227-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-67-227-2012, 2012
Cited articles
Barnes, T.: Afterword: strategic canonization?, J. Hist. Geogr., 49, 94–95, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2015.04.021, 2015.
Blumenberg, H.: Wirklichkeitsbegriff und Wirklichkeitspotential des Mythos, in: Terror und Spiel: Probleme der Mythenrezeption (= Poetik und Hermeneutik 4), Herausgeber:in: Fuhrmann, M., Wilhelm Fink, München, 11–66, ISBN 3770560086, 1971 [1990],
Bourdieu, P.: Die politische Ontologie Martin Heideggers, Syndikat, Frankfurt am Main, ISBN 978-3810800046, 1976.
Eisel, U.: Alte Zeiten, neue Zeiten – ein Bericht, verbunden mit einigen Gedanken über neugierige Identitätssuche, Geogr. Helv., 69, 313–317, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-69-313-2014, 2014.
Folkers, A.: Was ist neu am Neuen Materialismus? Von der Praxis zum Ereignis, in: Critical matter. Diskussionen eines neuen Materialismus, Herausgeber:innen: Goll, T., Keil, D., und Telios, T., edition assemblage, Münster, 17–33, ISBN 978-3-942885-50-8, 2013.
Habermas, J.: Politisch-Philosophische Profile, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, ISBN 978-3-518-28259-5, 1981.
Hannah, M.: Kiel 2019: geographischer Dialog für die Zukunft?, Geogr. Helv., 75, 319–324, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-75-319-2020, 2020.
Hard, G.: Spuren und Spurenleser: Zur Theorie und Ästhetik des Spurenlesens in der Vegetation und anderswo, Osnabrücker Studien zur Geographie, Band 16, Universitätsverlag Rasch, Osnabrück, ISBN 3-930595-33-8, 1995.
Hasse, J.: Wenn Utopien zu Mythen werden, Geogr. Helv., 69, 309–312, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-69-309-2014, 2014.
Helbrecht, I.: Der Kieler Geographentag 1969: Wunder und Wunden, Geogr. Helv., 69, 319–320, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-69-319-2014, 2014.
Keighren, I. M., Abrahamsson, C., und della Dora, V.: On canonical geographies, Dialog. Hum. Geogr., 2, 296–312, https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820612468534, 2012.
Klinke, I.: Life, Earth, Colony: Friedrich Ratzel's Necropolitical Geography, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11987710, 2023.
Korf, B.: Kiel 1969 – ein Mythos?, Geogr. Helv., 69, 291–292, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-69-291-2014, 2014a.
Korf. B.: Critical geography and the poison of Heidegger's thought, Geogr. Helv., 69, 145–146, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-69-145-2014, 2014b.
Korf, B. und Verne, J.: Editorial: Geographie als Geisteswissenschaft – Geographie in den Geisteswissenschaften, Geogr. Helv., 71, 365–368, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-365-2016, 2016.
Korf, B. und Wardenga, U.: Kiel 1969: Ein Erinnerungsort der Geographie, Geogr. Helv., 76, 381–384, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-381-2021, 2021.
Meckelein, W. und Borcherdt, C.: Deutscher Geographentag Kiel, 21. Bis 26. Juli 1969, Tagungsbericht und wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, Steiner, Wiesbaden, 1970.
Meusburger, P.: Handlungszentrierte Humangeographie: Benno Werlens Entwurf in kritischer Diskussion, Franz Steiner, Stuttgart, ISBN 978-3-515-07613-5, 1999.
Michel, B.: Wir sind nie revolutionär gewesen – Zum Mythos des Kieler Geographentags als der Geburtsstunde einer neuen Geographie, Geogr. Helv., 69, 301–303, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-69-301-2014, 2014.
Mouffe, C.: Introduction: Schmitt's Challenge, in: The Challenge of Carl Schmitt, edited by: Mouffe, C., Verso, London, 1–6, ISBN 1-85984-704-8, 1999.
Powell, R.: Notes on a geographical canon? Measures, models and scholarly enterprises, J. Hist. Geogr., 49, 2–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHG.2015.04.011, 2015.
Runkel, S.: Monadologie und Sozialgeographie. Theoretische Perspektiven mit Gabriel Tarde, Geogr. Z., 105, 52–75, 2017.
Sahr, W.-D.: KIEL 1969 – eine Mythanalyse zur Epistemologiegeschichte der deutschen Nachkriegsgeographie, Geogr. Helv., 71, 77–85, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-77-2016, 2016.
Schlottmann, A.: Begrenzte Sprache/Sprachgrenzen: Eine Replik auf die Besprechungen, ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 4, 262–269, 2005.
Schurr, C. und Weichhart, P.: From Margin to Center? Theoretische Aufbrüche in der Geographie seit Kiel 1969, Geogr. Helv., 75, 53–67, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-75-53-2020, 2020.
Verne, J.: The neglected „gift“ of Ratzel for/from the Indian Ocean: thoughts on mobilities, materialities and relational spaces, Geogr. Helv., 72, 85–92, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-72-85-2017, 2017.
Verne, J.: Ethnographie und ihre Folgen für die Kulturgeographie: eine Kritik des Netzwerkkonzepts in Studien zu translokaler Mobilität, Geogr. Helv., 67, 185–194, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-67-185-2012, 2013.
Wardenga, U.: Geographie als Chorologie – Alfred Hettners Versuch einer Standortbestimmung, in: 100 Jahre Geographie an der Ruprechts-Karls-Universität Heidelberg (1895–1995), Geographisches Institut, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 1–17, ISBN 978-3-515-06809-3, 1996.
Wardenga, U.: Vergangene Zukünfte – oder: Die Verhandlung neuer Möglichkeitsräume in der Geographie, Band 108, Heft 1, Geogr. Z., https://doi.org/10.25162/gz-2019-0009, 2020.
Wardenga, U.: Kiel 1969: Ein quellenkritischer Blick auf Tradierungsprozesse als „Arbeit am Mythos“, Geogr. Helv., 76, 299–303, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-299-2021, 2021.
Weichhart, P.: Entwicklungslinien der Sozialgeographie: Von Hans Bobek bis Benno Werlen, Franz Steiner, Stuttgart, ISBN 978-3-515-11394-6, 2008.
Werlen, B.: Sozialgeographie, Haupt, Bern, ISBN 978-3-8252-1911-6, 2000.
Werlen, B.: Laudatio: Gerhard Hard und der linguistic turn in der Geographie, in: Gerhard Hard: Ortsanknüpfungen, herausgegeben von Benno Werlen u.a., Sozialgeographische Manuskripte, Universität Jena, Jena, 13–17, 2009.
Werlen, B.: Kiel 1969 – Leuchtturm oder Irrlicht?, Geogr. Helv., 69, 293–299, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-69-293-2014, 2014.