Articles | Volume 71, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-215-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-215-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Book review: Im Raume lesen wir die Spuren der Gewalt
Geographisches Institut, Universität Zürich, Switzerland
Related authors
Benedikt Korf, Ute Wardenga, Julia Verne, Boris Michel, Francis Harvey, Antje Schlottmann, and Jeannine Wintzer
Geogr. Helv., 79, 161–175, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-161-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-161-2024, 2024
Eberhard Rothfuß, Mirka Dickel, Ute Wardenga, Ulf Strohmayer, Pascal Goeke, Peter Dirksmeier, Matthew Hannah, Paloma Puente Lozano, and Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 79, 119–147, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-119-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-119-2024, 2024
Benedikt Korf and Nadine Marquardt
Geogr. Helv., 79, 15–19, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-15-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-15-2024, 2024
Benedikt Korf, Eberhard Rothfuß, and Ute Wardenga
Geogr. Helv., 79, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-1-2024, 2024
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 78, 325–336, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-325-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-325-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, I approach German Theory as a conjunctive geography: as something that could, but did not take place. I explore the reasons why there is no German Theory (yet) by tracing the Foucault reception in German language geography and the German humanities. I study why these two variants of a
German Foucaulthave not traveled to Anglophone geography. Finally, I speculate what could have happened had the German Foucault traveled to Anglophone geography.
Benedikt Korf, Julia Verne, Jürgen Oßenbrügge, Matthew Hannah, Georg Glasze, and Annika Mattissek
Geogr. Helv., 77, 433–442, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-433-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-433-2022, 2022
Benedikt Korf, Eberhard Rothfuß, and Wolf-Dietrich Sahr
Geogr. Helv., 77, 85–96, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-85-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-85-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In diesem Editorial begründen wir die intellektuelle Agenda, die dem Themenheft «German Theory» zugrunde liegt. Um diese mit anglophonen, aber auch anderen (frankophonen, lusophonen) Theoriediskussionen ins Gespräch zu bringen, möchten wir aus der deutschsprachigen Geistesgeschichte entstandene Denkstile bewusster, autonomer, aber auch dialogischer in den Blick nehmen, in internationale Theoriedebatten einbringen, und so für eine Pluralität von Denkstilen werben.
Benedikt Korf and Ute Wardenga
Geogr. Helv., 76, 381–384, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-381-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-381-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this editorial, we introduce the special section on the politics of memory of
Kiel 1969, the famous German geographers' conference, in which, as the myth narrates, a revolution took place within the discipline of German-language geography. We introduce the three individual statements by Verne, Strohmayer and Weichhart, who all recount their entanglements with the myth of
Kiel 1969, and place them in a wider context of the history of geography.
Benedikt Korf, Maxie Bernhard, Tim Fässler, Meret Oehen, Nicola Siegrist, Livia Zeller, and Gary Seitz
Geogr. Helv., 76, 177–191, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-177-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-177-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper studies a student movement that opened up spaces for radical geography at the geography department of the University of Zurich in the early 1980s, where these students demanded a new curriculum. Building on archival material and narrative interviews, this paper documents the "thought style" of these student initiatives and illustrates the antagonistic political mood, in which these initiatives operated. This case thereby shows the precariousness of radical theory in geography.
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 74, 193–204, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-74-193-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-74-193-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This paper critically examines critical geography’s moralizing high ground. The paper makes this critique through a detour via the analyse of the critical gesture of the Greek cynics that the philosophers Foucault and Sloterdijk take to be a political practice of provocative truth-telling: For Foucault and Sloterdijk, the cynics are anti-dogmatic, anti-theoretical and anti-scholastic. I will argue, however, that the cynic is in danger of speaking from the moral high ground of an anti-critique.
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 73, 177–186, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-177-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-177-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
I critically interrogate the usefulness of the terminology of „post-secularism“ to understand the entanglement of religion and politics in multi-religious societies in the West and elsewhere. I suggest that the vocabulary of a descriptive political theology is better suited to study these dynamics and apply this conceptual vocabulary to analyse political-normative debates on Indian secularism and the everyday struggles of religious actors in the violent politics of Sri Lanka's civil war.
Benedikt Korf and Julia Verne
Geogr. Helv., 71, 365–368, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-365-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-365-2016, 2016
B. Korf
Geogr. Helv., 68, 73–75, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-73-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-73-2013, 2013
B. Korf
Geogr. Helv., 67, 227–228, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-67-227-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-67-227-2012, 2012
Benedikt Korf, Ute Wardenga, Julia Verne, Boris Michel, Francis Harvey, Antje Schlottmann, and Jeannine Wintzer
Geogr. Helv., 79, 161–175, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-161-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-161-2024, 2024
Eberhard Rothfuß, Mirka Dickel, Ute Wardenga, Ulf Strohmayer, Pascal Goeke, Peter Dirksmeier, Matthew Hannah, Paloma Puente Lozano, and Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 79, 119–147, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-119-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-119-2024, 2024
Benedikt Korf and Nadine Marquardt
Geogr. Helv., 79, 15–19, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-15-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-15-2024, 2024
Benedikt Korf, Eberhard Rothfuß, and Ute Wardenga
Geogr. Helv., 79, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-1-2024, 2024
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 78, 325–336, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-325-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-325-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, I approach German Theory as a conjunctive geography: as something that could, but did not take place. I explore the reasons why there is no German Theory (yet) by tracing the Foucault reception in German language geography and the German humanities. I study why these two variants of a
German Foucaulthave not traveled to Anglophone geography. Finally, I speculate what could have happened had the German Foucault traveled to Anglophone geography.
Benedikt Korf, Julia Verne, Jürgen Oßenbrügge, Matthew Hannah, Georg Glasze, and Annika Mattissek
Geogr. Helv., 77, 433–442, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-433-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-433-2022, 2022
Benedikt Korf, Eberhard Rothfuß, and Wolf-Dietrich Sahr
Geogr. Helv., 77, 85–96, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-85-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-85-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In diesem Editorial begründen wir die intellektuelle Agenda, die dem Themenheft «German Theory» zugrunde liegt. Um diese mit anglophonen, aber auch anderen (frankophonen, lusophonen) Theoriediskussionen ins Gespräch zu bringen, möchten wir aus der deutschsprachigen Geistesgeschichte entstandene Denkstile bewusster, autonomer, aber auch dialogischer in den Blick nehmen, in internationale Theoriedebatten einbringen, und so für eine Pluralität von Denkstilen werben.
Benedikt Korf and Ute Wardenga
Geogr. Helv., 76, 381–384, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-381-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-381-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this editorial, we introduce the special section on the politics of memory of
Kiel 1969, the famous German geographers' conference, in which, as the myth narrates, a revolution took place within the discipline of German-language geography. We introduce the three individual statements by Verne, Strohmayer and Weichhart, who all recount their entanglements with the myth of
Kiel 1969, and place them in a wider context of the history of geography.
Benedikt Korf, Maxie Bernhard, Tim Fässler, Meret Oehen, Nicola Siegrist, Livia Zeller, and Gary Seitz
Geogr. Helv., 76, 177–191, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-177-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-177-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper studies a student movement that opened up spaces for radical geography at the geography department of the University of Zurich in the early 1980s, where these students demanded a new curriculum. Building on archival material and narrative interviews, this paper documents the "thought style" of these student initiatives and illustrates the antagonistic political mood, in which these initiatives operated. This case thereby shows the precariousness of radical theory in geography.
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 74, 193–204, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-74-193-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-74-193-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This paper critically examines critical geography’s moralizing high ground. The paper makes this critique through a detour via the analyse of the critical gesture of the Greek cynics that the philosophers Foucault and Sloterdijk take to be a political practice of provocative truth-telling: For Foucault and Sloterdijk, the cynics are anti-dogmatic, anti-theoretical and anti-scholastic. I will argue, however, that the cynic is in danger of speaking from the moral high ground of an anti-critique.
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 73, 177–186, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-177-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-177-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
I critically interrogate the usefulness of the terminology of „post-secularism“ to understand the entanglement of religion and politics in multi-religious societies in the West and elsewhere. I suggest that the vocabulary of a descriptive political theology is better suited to study these dynamics and apply this conceptual vocabulary to analyse political-normative debates on Indian secularism and the everyday struggles of religious actors in the violent politics of Sri Lanka's civil war.
Benedikt Korf and Julia Verne
Geogr. Helv., 71, 365–368, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-365-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-365-2016, 2016
B. Korf
Geogr. Helv., 68, 73–75, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-73-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-73-2013, 2013
B. Korf
Geogr. Helv., 67, 227–228, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-67-227-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-67-227-2012, 2012
Cited articles
Foucault, M.: Vom Licht des Krieges zur Geburt der Geschichte, Übersetzer: Walter Seitter, 60 S., Berlin, Merve, 1986 [1976].
Schlögel, K.: Im Raume lesen wir die Zeit, Hanser, München, 2003.
Snyder, T.: Bloodlands, Europe between Hitler and Stalin, Vintage, London, 2011.
Werber, N.: Die Geopolitik der Literatur, Hanser, München, 2007.