Articles | Volume 77, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-433-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-433-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Book review: Handbuch Diskurs und Raum
Geographisches Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Deutschland
Julia Verne
Geographisches Institut, Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland
Jürgen Oßenbrügge
Institut für Geographie und Centrum für Erdsystemforschung und Nachhaltigkeit (CEN), Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland
Matthew Hannah
Geographisches Institut, Universität Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Deutschland
Georg Glasze
Institut für Geographie, FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
Annika Mattissek
Institut für Umweltsozialwissenschaften und Geographie,
Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland
Related authors
Benedikt Korf, Ute Wardenga, Julia Verne, Boris Michel, Francis Harvey, Antje Schlottmann, and Jeannine Wintzer
Geogr. Helv., 79, 161–175, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-161-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-161-2024, 2024
Eberhard Rothfuß, Mirka Dickel, Ute Wardenga, Ulf Strohmayer, Pascal Goeke, Peter Dirksmeier, Matthew Hannah, Paloma Puente Lozano, and Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 79, 119–147, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-119-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-119-2024, 2024
Benedikt Korf and Nadine Marquardt
Geogr. Helv., 79, 15–19, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-15-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-15-2024, 2024
Benedikt Korf, Eberhard Rothfuß, and Ute Wardenga
Geogr. Helv., 79, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-1-2024, 2024
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 78, 325–336, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-325-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-325-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, I approach German Theory as a conjunctive geography: as something that could, but did not take place. I explore the reasons why there is no German Theory (yet) by tracing the Foucault reception in German language geography and the German humanities. I study why these two variants of a
German Foucaulthave not traveled to Anglophone geography. Finally, I speculate what could have happened had the German Foucault traveled to Anglophone geography.
Benedikt Korf, Eberhard Rothfuß, and Wolf-Dietrich Sahr
Geogr. Helv., 77, 85–96, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-85-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-85-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In diesem Editorial begründen wir die intellektuelle Agenda, die dem Themenheft «German Theory» zugrunde liegt. Um diese mit anglophonen, aber auch anderen (frankophonen, lusophonen) Theoriediskussionen ins Gespräch zu bringen, möchten wir aus der deutschsprachigen Geistesgeschichte entstandene Denkstile bewusster, autonomer, aber auch dialogischer in den Blick nehmen, in internationale Theoriedebatten einbringen, und so für eine Pluralität von Denkstilen werben.
Benedikt Korf and Ute Wardenga
Geogr. Helv., 76, 381–384, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-381-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-381-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this editorial, we introduce the special section on the politics of memory of
Kiel 1969, the famous German geographers' conference, in which, as the myth narrates, a revolution took place within the discipline of German-language geography. We introduce the three individual statements by Verne, Strohmayer and Weichhart, who all recount their entanglements with the myth of
Kiel 1969, and place them in a wider context of the history of geography.
Benedikt Korf, Maxie Bernhard, Tim Fässler, Meret Oehen, Nicola Siegrist, Livia Zeller, and Gary Seitz
Geogr. Helv., 76, 177–191, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-177-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-177-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper studies a student movement that opened up spaces for radical geography at the geography department of the University of Zurich in the early 1980s, where these students demanded a new curriculum. Building on archival material and narrative interviews, this paper documents the "thought style" of these student initiatives and illustrates the antagonistic political mood, in which these initiatives operated. This case thereby shows the precariousness of radical theory in geography.
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 74, 193–204, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-74-193-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-74-193-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This paper critically examines critical geography’s moralizing high ground. The paper makes this critique through a detour via the analyse of the critical gesture of the Greek cynics that the philosophers Foucault and Sloterdijk take to be a political practice of provocative truth-telling: For Foucault and Sloterdijk, the cynics are anti-dogmatic, anti-theoretical and anti-scholastic. I will argue, however, that the cynic is in danger of speaking from the moral high ground of an anti-critique.
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 73, 177–186, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-177-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-177-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
I critically interrogate the usefulness of the terminology of „post-secularism“ to understand the entanglement of religion and politics in multi-religious societies in the West and elsewhere. I suggest that the vocabulary of a descriptive political theology is better suited to study these dynamics and apply this conceptual vocabulary to analyse political-normative debates on Indian secularism and the everyday struggles of religious actors in the violent politics of Sri Lanka's civil war.
Benedikt Korf and Julia Verne
Geogr. Helv., 71, 365–368, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-365-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-365-2016, 2016
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 71, 215–216, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-215-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-215-2016, 2016
B. Korf
Geogr. Helv., 68, 73–75, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-73-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-73-2013, 2013
B. Korf
Geogr. Helv., 67, 227–228, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-67-227-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-67-227-2012, 2012
Benedikt Korf, Ute Wardenga, Julia Verne, Boris Michel, Francis Harvey, Antje Schlottmann, and Jeannine Wintzer
Geogr. Helv., 79, 161–175, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-161-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-161-2024, 2024
Eberhard Rothfuß, Mirka Dickel, Ute Wardenga, Ulf Strohmayer, Pascal Goeke, Peter Dirksmeier, Matthew Hannah, Paloma Puente Lozano, and Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 79, 119–147, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-119-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-119-2024, 2024
Benedikt Korf and Nadine Marquardt
Geogr. Helv., 79, 15–19, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-15-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-15-2024, 2024
Benedikt Korf, Eberhard Rothfuß, and Ute Wardenga
Geogr. Helv., 79, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-1-2024, 2024
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 78, 325–336, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-325-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-325-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, I approach German Theory as a conjunctive geography: as something that could, but did not take place. I explore the reasons why there is no German Theory (yet) by tracing the Foucault reception in German language geography and the German humanities. I study why these two variants of a
German Foucaulthave not traveled to Anglophone geography. Finally, I speculate what could have happened had the German Foucault traveled to Anglophone geography.
Benedikt Korf, Eberhard Rothfuß, and Wolf-Dietrich Sahr
Geogr. Helv., 77, 85–96, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-85-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-85-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In diesem Editorial begründen wir die intellektuelle Agenda, die dem Themenheft «German Theory» zugrunde liegt. Um diese mit anglophonen, aber auch anderen (frankophonen, lusophonen) Theoriediskussionen ins Gespräch zu bringen, möchten wir aus der deutschsprachigen Geistesgeschichte entstandene Denkstile bewusster, autonomer, aber auch dialogischer in den Blick nehmen, in internationale Theoriedebatten einbringen, und so für eine Pluralität von Denkstilen werben.
Benedikt Korf and Ute Wardenga
Geogr. Helv., 76, 381–384, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-381-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-381-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this editorial, we introduce the special section on the politics of memory of
Kiel 1969, the famous German geographers' conference, in which, as the myth narrates, a revolution took place within the discipline of German-language geography. We introduce the three individual statements by Verne, Strohmayer and Weichhart, who all recount their entanglements with the myth of
Kiel 1969, and place them in a wider context of the history of geography.
Benedikt Korf, Maxie Bernhard, Tim Fässler, Meret Oehen, Nicola Siegrist, Livia Zeller, and Gary Seitz
Geogr. Helv., 76, 177–191, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-177-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-177-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper studies a student movement that opened up spaces for radical geography at the geography department of the University of Zurich in the early 1980s, where these students demanded a new curriculum. Building on archival material and narrative interviews, this paper documents the "thought style" of these student initiatives and illustrates the antagonistic political mood, in which these initiatives operated. This case thereby shows the precariousness of radical theory in geography.
Julia Verne
Geogr. Helv., 76, 159–161, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-159-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-159-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Kiel 1969bietet einen Einstieg, um über die spezifisch deutschsprachige Entwicklung des Faches nachzudenken und wissenschaftliche Dynamiken in gesellschaftliche Kontexte einzubetten.
Kiel 1969zeigt, wie spannend und vielschichtig die Geographie ist, und die Debatte darum zeigt, wieviel wir nicht wissen, wie einfach wir es uns manchmal machen und wieviel es noch zu entdecken gibt. Aus meiner Perspektive ist
Kiel 1969wichtig, aber eben nicht nur
Kiel 1969!
Matthew G. Hannah
Geogr. Helv., 75, 319–324, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-75-319-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-75-319-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Die Intervention befasst sich vor allem mit der Dynamik des Dialogs zwischen Carolin Schur und Peter Weichhart. Die leitende rage lautet, Wie kann wissenschaftlicher Dialog am besten gestaltet werden unter Bedingungen der tendenziell zunehmenden Wissenslücken der jeweiligen Dialogpartner*innen gegenüber anderen Standpunkten? Es wird argumentiert, dass diese Frage am besten geantwortet werden kann, wenn wir unser Verständnis für die subtile Auswirkungen der Positionalität verbessern.
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 74, 193–204, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-74-193-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-74-193-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This paper critically examines critical geography’s moralizing high ground. The paper makes this critique through a detour via the analyse of the critical gesture of the Greek cynics that the philosophers Foucault and Sloterdijk take to be a political practice of provocative truth-telling: For Foucault and Sloterdijk, the cynics are anti-dogmatic, anti-theoretical and anti-scholastic. I will argue, however, that the cynic is in danger of speaking from the moral high ground of an anti-critique.
Jürgen Oßenbrügge
Geogr. Helv., 73, 309–319, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-309-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-309-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The paper outlines an approach to right wing populism in recent years not only in critizing the use of so called alternative facts but using the concept of a regressive modernisation as a debate which includes populist movements into a broader diagnosis of western societies. These findings are used in order to explain transformations of social geography. It is argued that the success of postmodern geographies is unable to counteract geographies of recent right wing populism.
Georg Glasze and Thomas M. Schmitt
Geogr. Helv., 73, 285–300, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-285-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-285-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
For a long time, the mainstream of social and cultural geography seems to have implicitly accepted that religion is becoming obsolete. However, since the 1990s, religion has aroused new interest in the social sciences in general, and to some extent also in social and cultural geography. The paper introduces the interdisciplinary debate on theories of secularisation and the promotion of post-secular perspectives and shows the potential of this debate for social and cultural geography.
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 73, 177–186, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-177-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-177-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
I critically interrogate the usefulness of the terminology of „post-secularism“ to understand the entanglement of religion and politics in multi-religious societies in the West and elsewhere. I suggest that the vocabulary of a descriptive political theology is better suited to study these dynamics and apply this conceptual vocabulary to analyse political-normative debates on Indian secularism and the everyday struggles of religious actors in the violent politics of Sri Lanka's civil war.
Annika Mattissek and Cindy Sturm
Geogr. Helv., 72, 123–135, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-72-123-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-72-123-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Drawing on a research project on adaptations of climate and energy policies in German cities we ask why, despite the growing number of laws and recommendations formulated on the national level, local adaptations of climate and energy policies vary significantly between different cities. We explain how discourse and governmentality studies can be brought into resonance with the policy mobility debate and suggest that these concepts are particularly well suited to explain these discrepancies.
Julia Verne
Geogr. Helv., 72, 85–92, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-72-85-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-72-85-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This article urges us to rethink our engagement with
politically problematicfigures in our own discipline. Focusing on Friedrich Ratzel, it illustrates the contemporary, though widely unnoticed, (re)appearance of Ratzel’s ideas, and uses this example to emphasise the need for more critical reflection concerning the history of our discipline as well as the complex ways in which political ideologies and intellectual reasoning relate to each other.
Benedikt Korf and Julia Verne
Geogr. Helv., 71, 365–368, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-365-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-365-2016, 2016
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 71, 215–216, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-215-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-215-2016, 2016
B. Korf
Geogr. Helv., 68, 73–75, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-73-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-73-2013, 2013
B. Korf
Geogr. Helv., 67, 227–228, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-67-227-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-67-227-2012, 2012
Cited articles
Arendt, H.: Wahrheit und Lüge in der Politik, Piper, München, ISBN 978-3-492-30328-6, 2013 [1971].
Bakker, K. J.: The limits of ‚neoliberal natures‘: Debating green
neoliberalism, Prog. Hum. Geogr., 34, 715–735, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510376849, 2010.
Baumann, C., Lahr-Kurten, M., und Winkler, J.: Praktiken, in: Handbuch Diskurs und Raum, Herausgeber: Glasze, G. und Mattissek, A., transcript Verlag, 269–289, https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839432181-024, 2021.
Berndt, C. und Pütz, R.: Kulturelle Geographien. Zur Beschäftigung mit Raum und Ort nach dem Cultural Turn, Transcript, Bielefeld, ISBN 978-3-8394-0724-0, 2007.
Bingham, N.: Object-ions: from technological determinism towards geographies
of relations, Environ. Plan. D, 14, 635–657, 1996.
Chakrabarty, D.: Das Klima der Geschichte im planetarischen Zeitalter,
Suhrkamp, Berlin, 500 pp., ISBN 978-3-518-58779-9, 2022.
Diaz-Bone, R. und Horvath, K.: Konventionen, epistemische Werte und Kritik.
Neopragmatische Perspektiven auf Sozialforschung, ZQF – Zeitschrift für
Qualitative Sozialforschung, 20, 235–251, 2019.
Gebhardt, H., Reuber, P., und Wolkersforder, G.: Kulturgeographie: Aktuelle
Ansätze und Entwicklungen, Spektrum, Heidelberg, ISBN 978-3-8274-1393-2, 2003.
Glasze, G. und Mattissek, A. (Hrsg.): Vorwort zur dritten, aktualisierten und
erweiterten Auflage, in: Handbuch Diskurs und Raum, transcript Verlag, 9–12, ISBN 978-3-8376-3218-7, 2021.
Gregory, D.: The Colonial Present, Blackwell, Oxford, ISBN 978-1-577-18089-0, 2004.
Habermas, J.: Die Einheit der Vernunft in der Vielheit ihrer Stimmen, Merkur, 42, 1–14, 1988.
Hannah, M: Innovations in the Afterlife of the Cold War: German-language
Human Geography, Social Cult. Geogr., 17, 71–80, 2016.
Hannah, M.: Direction and Sociospatial Theory: A Political Economy of Oriented Practice, Routledge, London, ISBN 978-0-3675-8317-0, 2019.
Howarth, D., Glynos, J., and Griggs, S.: Discourse, explanation and
critique, Crit. Policy Stud., 10, 99–104, https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2015.1131618, 2016.
Ingold, T.: Culture on the Ground: The World Perceived Through the Feet, J. Mater. Cult., 9, 315–340, 2004.
Ingold, T.: Being Alive. Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description,
Routledge, New York, ISBN 978-1-0320-5231-1, 2011.
Jackson, P.: Rematerialising Social and Cultural Geography, Social Cult. Geogr., 1, 9–14, 2000.
Langer, A., Nonhoff, M., und Reisigl, M. (Hrsg.): Diskursanalyse und Kritik – Einleitung, in: Diskursanalyse und Kritik, Springer VS, Wiesbaden, 1–14, ISBN 978-3-658-02179-5, 2019.
Latour, B.: Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to
Matters of Concern, Crit. Inquiry, 30, 225–248, 2004.
Latour, B.: Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford, ISBN 978-0-1992-5605-1, 2005.
Lossau, J.: Kulturgeographie als Perspektive. Zur Debatte um den cultural turn in der Humangeographie – eine Zwischenbilanz, Berichte zur deutschen
Landeskunde, 82, 317–334, 2008.
Marchart, O.: Die Politische Differenz, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, ISBN 978-3-518-29556-4, 2016.
Marshall, T.: Prisoners of Geography: Ten Maps That Explain Everything about the World, Simon & Schuster, New York, ISBN 978-1-5011-2146-3, 2015.
Massaro, V. A. and Williams, J.: Feminist Geopolitics, Geogr. Compass, 7,
567–577, https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12054, 2013.
Mattissek, A. und Reuber, P.: Ins Spiel der Wahrheit eintreten: Die Herstellung von Wissen und Macht in der Diskursforschung, in: Handbuch Diskurs und Raum, Herausgeber: Glasze, G. und Mattissek, A., transcript Verlag, 461–468, ISBN 978-3-8376-3218-7, 2021.
McGoey, L.: Strategic unknowns: toward a sociology of ignorance, Econ. Soc., 41, 1–16, 2012.
Moats, D.: From Media Technologies to Mediated Events: A Different Settlement between Media Studies and Science and Technology Studies, Inform. Commun. Soc., 22, 1165–1180, 2017.
Nonhoff, M.: Diskursanalyse und/als Kritik, in: Diskursanalyse und Kritik,
Herausgeber: Langer, A., Nonhoff, M., und Reisigl, M., Springer VS, Wiesbaden, 15–44, ISBN 978-3-658-02179-5, 2019.
Nullmeier, F.: Wahrheit, Öffentlichkeit und Meinung, in: Demokratie und Wahrheit, Herausgeber: Vogelmann, F. und Nonhoff, M., Nomos, Baden-Baden, 23–44, ISBN 978-3-8487-8645-9, 2021.
Oreskes, N. and Conway, E.: Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists
Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming, Bloomsbury, London, ISBN 978-1-6081-9394-3, 2012.
Oßenbrügge, J.: „March for Sozialgeographie“? Rechtspopulismus als Zumutung und die regressive Moderne als Herausforderung der Humangeographie, Geogr. Helv., 73, 309–319, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-309-2018, 2018.
Proctor, R. and Schiebinger, L. (Eds.): Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance, Stanford University Press, Stanford, ISBN 978-0-8047-5901-4, 2008.
Ramp, W. and Harrison, T.: Libertarian populism, neoliberal rationality, and
the mandatory long-form census: implications for sociology, The Canadian
Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 37, 273–294, 2012.
Schlitte, A., Verne, M., und Wedekind, G.: Die Handlungsmacht ästhetischer Objekte, DeGruyter, Berlin, ISBN 978-3-11-070279-8, 2021.
Schurr, C. and Strüver, A.: „The Rest“: Geographien des
Alltäglichen zwischen Affekt, Emotion und Repräsentation, Geogr.
Helv., 71, 87–97, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-87-2016, 2016.
Steinbrink, M. und Aufenvenne, P.: Über Othering, Entgrenzung und
Mainstreaming der Neuen Kulturgeographie. Eine kleine Disziplinbeobachtung,
Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft, 159,
83–104, 2017.
Streeck, W.: Die Wiederkehr der Verdrängten als Anfang vom Ende des
neoliberalen Kapitalismus, in: Die große Regression, Herausgeber: Geiselberger, H., Suhrkamp, Berlin, 253–274, ISBN 978-3-518-07291-2, 2017.
Thrift, N. and Dewsbury, J. D.: Dead Geographies – And How to Make Them
Live, Environ. Plan. D, 18, 411–432, 2000.
Tsing, A.: The Mushroom at the End of the World. On the Possibility of Life
in Capitalist Ruins, Princeton University Press, Princeton, ISBN 978-0-6912-2055-0, 2015.
van Dyk, S.: Krise der Faktizität? Über Wahrheit und Lüge in der
Politik und die Aufgabe der Kritik, PROKLA, 47, 347–367, 2017.
Walton-Roberts, M., Beaujot, R., Hiebert, D., McDaniel, S., Rose, D., and
Wright, R.: Why do we still need a census? Views from the age of
‚truthiness‘ and the ‚death of evidence‘, The Canadian Geographer/ Le Géographe canadien, 58, 34–47, 2014.
Werber, N.: Geopolitik zur Einführung, Junius, Hamburg, ISBN 978-3-88506-085-7, 2014.
Whatmore, S.: Hybrid Geographies: Natures Cultures Spaces, SAGE, London,
ISBN 978-0-7619-6567-1, 2002.
Wiertz, T.: Materialität, in: Handbuch Diskurs und Raum, Herausgeber:
Glasze, G. und Mattissek, A., transcript Verlag, 291–308, ISBN 978-3-8376-3218-7, 2021.
Wiertz, T. und Schopper, T.: Theoretische und methodische Perspektiven
für eine Diskursforschung im digitalen Raum, Geogr. Z., 107, 254,
https://doi.org/10.25162/gz-2019-0008, 2019.
Winkler, J., Tijé-Dra, A., und Baumann, C.: Ethnographische Ansätze
zur Analyse diskursiver Praxis, in: Handbuch Diskurs und Raum, Herausgeber:
Glasze, G. und Mattissek, A., transcript Verlag, 417–440,
https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839432181-024, 2021.
Zuboff, S.: The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future
at the New Frontier of Power, Profile Books, London, ISBN 978-1-6103-9569-4, 2019.