Articles | Volume 80, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-80-135-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-80-135-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Intervention
| 
15 May 2025
Intervention |
| 15 May 2025
| 15 May 2025
Groundwater urgencies: what can geography offer?
Fanny Frick-Trzebitzky
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Research Unit Water and Land Use, Institute for Social-Ecological Research, 60486 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Robert Luetkemeier
Research Unit Water and Land Use, Institute for Social-Ecological Research, 60486 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Altenhöferallee 1, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Iordanka Guenova Dountcheva-Robles
Hydrogeology Group, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 02006, Albacete, Spain
David Sanz
Hydrogeology Group, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 02006, Albacete, Spain
Dženeta Hodžić
Research Unit Water and Land Use, Institute for Social-Ecological Research, 60486 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Institute of Cultural Anthropology and European Ethnology, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60323 Frankfurt, Germany
David Kuhn
Research Unit Water and Land Use, Institute for Social-Ecological Research, 60486 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Amit Kumar Srivastwa
School of Human Ecology, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar University Delhi, Lothian Road, Delhi, 110006, India
Christina Walter
Institute of Geography, University of Augsburg, 86159 Augsburg, Germany
Linda Söller
Research Unit Water and Land Use, Institute for Social-Ecological Research, 60486 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Altenhöferallee 1, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Jakob Kramer
Professur für Forst- und Umweltpolitik, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
Related authors
Fanny Frick-Trzebitzky, Rossella Alba, and Kristiane Fehrs
Geogr. Helv., 78, 397–409, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-397-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-397-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Institutional bricolage and socio-technical tinkering are lenses that expose everyday entanglements, arrangements and processuality in governance. We combine both lenses to analyse adaptive water governance in Accra, Ghana, and Mansfeld-Südharz, Germany. We conclude that the bricolage perspective contributes to bringing multiple forms of being and knowing into engagement when envisioning adaptive water governance in the Anthropocene.
Fanny Frick-Trzebitzky, Rossella Alba, and Kristiane Fehrs
Geogr. Helv., 78, 397–409, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-397-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-397-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Institutional bricolage and socio-technical tinkering are lenses that expose everyday entanglements, arrangements and processuality in governance. We combine both lenses to analyse adaptive water governance in Accra, Ghana, and Mansfeld-Südharz, Germany. We conclude that the bricolage perspective contributes to bringing multiple forms of being and knowing into engagement when envisioning adaptive water governance in the Anthropocene.
Serge Middendorf, Sebastian Purwins, and Christina Walter
Geogr. Helv., 77, 459–466, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-459-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-459-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In (Anthropo-)Geography, especially in the Anthropocene, the question of what constitutes the human is of utmost interest. In the process, this
humanis often strangely assumed to be self-evident, almost (self-)explanatory. In the sense of a German Theory, we want to encourage to pose these question on the human anew with Helmuth Plessner and to point out new possible answers. Otherwise these questions are in danger of withering away into a
Minimal Anthropology.
Cited articles
Adams, P. C.: Language and Groundwater: Symbolic Gradients of the Anthropocene, Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr., 111, 677–686, https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1782724, 2021.
Anglian Water: New water main network, https://www.anglianwater.co.uk/about-us/our-strategies-and-plans/new-water-pipelines (last access: 31 July 2024), 2023.
Bakker, K.: Water – political biopolitical material, Soc. Stud. Sci., 42, 616–623, 2012.
Boelens, R., Hoogesteger, J., Swyngedouw, E., Vos, J., and Wester, P.: Hydrosocial territories: a political ecology perspective, Water Int., 41, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2016.1134898, 2016.
Cabello, V., Kovacic, Z., and van Cauwenbergh, N.: Unravelling narratives of water management: Reflections on epistemic uncertainty in the first cycle of implementation of the Water Framework Directive in southern Spain, Environ. Sci. Pol., 85, 19–27, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.03.019, 2018.
Cassiraga, E, Sanz, D., Gómez-Alday, J. J., and Gómez-Hernández, J. J.: Groundwater management in Spain: The case of the Eastern Mancha aquifer system, Hydrolink Mag., 3, 81–83, 2019.
Castree, N., Demeritt, D., and Liverman, D. M.: Introduction: Making Sense of Environmental Geography, in: A companion to environmental geography, edited by: Castree, N., Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK, Malden MA, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444305722.ch1, 2009.
Cotta, B., Coenen, J., Challies, E., Newig, J., Lenschow, A., and Schilling-Vacaflor, A.: Environmental governance in globally telecoupled systems: Mapping the terrain towards an integrated research agenda, Earth System Governance, 13, 100142, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2022.100142, 2022.
Dountcheva, I., Sanz, D., Cassiraga, E., and Galabov, V., and Gómez-Alday, J. J.: Identifying non-stationary and long-term river-aquifer interactions as a response to large climatic patterns and anthropogenic pressures using wavelet analysis (Mancha Oriental Aquifer, Spain), Hydrol. Process., 34, 5134–5145, 2020.
Esteban, E. and Albiac, J.: The problem of sustainable groundwater management: the case of La Mancha aquifers, Spain, Hydrogeol. J., 20, 851–863, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-012-0853-3, 2012.
Falkenmark, M., Wang-Erlandsson, L., and Rockström, J.: Understanding of water resilience in the Anthropocene, J. Hydrol. X, 2, 100009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2018.100009, 2019.
Flaminio, S., Rouillé-Kielo, G., and Le Visage, S.: Waterscapes and hydrosocial territories: Thinking space in political ecologies of water, Progress in Environmental Geography, 1, 33–57, https://doi.org/10.1177/27539687221106796, 2022.
Grbac Žikovic, R., Oresic, D., and Čanjevac, I.: Water supply system of the area of Rijeka – contemporary issues, Geoadria, 14/2, 201–220, 2009.
Hodžić, D.: Unruly aquifers: Infrastructuring a karstic groundwater catchment at a post-Yugoslav border, Science, Technology, & Human Values, in review, 2025.
Huggins, X., Gleeson, T., Castilla-Rho, J., Holley, C., Re, V., and Famiglietti, J. S.: Groundwater connections and sustainability in social-ecological systems, Ground Water, 61, 463–478, https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13305, 2023.
Huggins, X., Gleeson, T., Villholth, K., Rocha, J., and Famiglietti, J.: Groundwaterscapes: A global classification and mapping of groundwater's large-scale socioeconomic, ecological, and Earth system functions, Water Resour. Res., 60, e2023WR036287, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR036287, 2024.
Hummel, D., Jahn, T., Kramm, J., and Stieß, I.: Gesellschaftliche Naturverhältnisse – Grundbegriff und Denkraum für die Gestaltung von sozial-ökologischen Transformationen, in: Handbuch Umweltsoziologie, edited by: Sonnberger, M., Bleicher, A., and Groß, M., Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37222-4_1-1, 2023.
Jahn, T., Bergmann, M., and Keil, F.: Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization, Ecol. Econ., 79, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.017, 2012.
Kanesu, R. and Bruns, A.: Durchlässige Grenzen im Anthropozän, Über multiple Grenzverschiebungen und Wasser als räumliches, zeitliches und ontologisches Grenzobjekt, in: B/ordering the Anthropocene: Inter- and Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Nature-Culture Relations, edited by: Bruns, A. and Kanesu, R., UniGR-CBS Thematic Issue, 5, UniGR-Center for Border Studies, 24–41, 2020.
Korf, B.: Hydraulischer Imperialismus, Geographie und epistemische Gewalt in Sri Lanka, in: GrenzWerte.: Tagungsbericht und Abhandlungen 55. Deutscher Geographentag Trier 2005, edited by: Kulke, E., Monheim, H., and Wittmann, P., Deutsche Gesellschaft für Geographie, Leipzig, 627–633, https://doi.org/10.5167/UZH-77019, 2005.
Krueger, T. and Alba, R.: Ontological and epistemological commitments in interdisciplinary water research: Uncertainty as an entry point for reflexion, Front. Water, 4, 1038322, https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2022.1038322, 2022.
Latour, B.: Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern, Critical Inquiry, 30, 225–248, https://doi.org/10.1086/421123, 2004.
Lazurko, A., Schweizer, V., Pintér, L., and Ferguson, D.: Boundaries of the future: A framework for reflexive scenario practice in sustainability science, One Earth, 6, 1703–1725, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.10.027, 2023.
Linton, J. and Budds, J.: The hydrosocial cycle: Defining and mobilizing a relational-dialectical approach to water, Geoforum, 57, 170–180, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.10.008, 2014.
Linton, J. and Krueger, T.: The Ontological Fallacy of the Water Framework Directive: Implications and Alternatives, Water Altern., 3, 513–533, 2020.
Liu, J., Hull, V., Batistella, M., DeFries, R., Dietz, T., Fu, F., Hertel, T. W., Izaurralde, R. C., Lambin, E. F., Li, S., Martinelli, L. A., McConnell, W. J., Moran, E. F., Naylor, R., Ouyang, Z., Polenske, K. R., Reenberg, A., Miranda Rocha, G. de, Simmons, C. S., Verburg, P. H., Vitousek, P. M., Zhang, F., and Zhu, C.: Framing Sustainability in a Telecoupled World, Ecol. Soc., 18, 26, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05873-180226, 2013.
Luetkemeier, R., Frick-Trzebitzky, F., Hodžić, D., Jäger, A., Kuhn, D., and Söller, L.: Telecoupled Groundwaters: New Ways to Investigate Increasingly De-Localized Resources, Water, 13, 2906, https://doi.org/10.3390/w13202906, 2021.
Margat, J. and van der Gun, J.: Groundwater Around the World: A Geographic Synopsis, Groundwater, 51, 486–487, https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12072, 2013.
Melo Zurita, M. d. L. and Munro, P. G.: Voluminous territorialisation: Historical contestations over the Yucatan Peninsula's subterranean waterscape, Geoforum, 102, 38–47, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.03.019, 2019.
Rockström, J., Gupta, J., Qin, D., Lade, S. J., Abrams, J. F., Andersen, L. S., Armstrong McKay, D. I., Bai, X., Bala, G., Bunn, S. E., Ciobanu, D., DeClerck, F., Ebi, K., Gifford, L., Gordon, C., Hasan, S., Kanie, N., Lenton, T. M., Loriani, S., Liverman, D. M., Mohamed, A., Nakicenovic, N., Obura, D., Ospina, D., Prodani, K., Rammelt, C., Sakschewski, B., Scholtens, J., Stewart-Koster, B., Tharammal, T., van Vuuren, D., Verburg, P. H., Winkelmann, R., Zimm, C., Bennett, E. M., Bringezu, S., Broadgate, W., Green, P. A., Huang, L., Jacobson, L., Ndehedehe, C., Pedde, S., Rocha, J., Scheffer, M., Schulte-Uebbing, L., Vries, W. de, Xiao, C., Xu, C., Xu, X., Zafra-Calvo, N., and Zhang, X.: Safe and just Earth system boundaries, Nature, 619, 102–111, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06083-8, 2023.
Rusca, M. and Di Baldassarre, G.: Interdisciplinary Critical Geographies of Water: Capturing the Mutual Shaping of Society and Hydrological Flows, Water, 11, 1973, https://doi.org/10.3390/w11101973, 2019.
Rusca, M., Browne, A. L., Di Baldassarre, G., and Menga, F.: Pluralising the materiality of water: More-than-water, lively waters, water with, and the agency of hydro-social assemblages, Environ. Plann. E, 8, 3–12, https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486241301249, 2024.
Saccò, M., Mammola, S., Altermatt, F., Alther, R., Bolpagni, R., Brancelj, A., Brankovits, D., Fišer, C., Gerovasileiou, V., Griebler, C., Guareschi, S., Hose, G. C., Korbel, K., Lictevout, E., Malard, F., Martínez, A., Niemiller, M. L., Robertson, A., Tanalgo, K. C., Bichuette, M. E., Borko, Š., Brad, T., Campbell, M. A., Cardoso, P., Celico, F., Cooper, S. J. B., Culver, D., Di Lorenzo, T., Galassi, D. M. P., Guzik, M. T., Hartland, A., Humphreys, W. F., Ferreira, R. L., Lunghi, E., Nizzoli, D., Perina, G., Raghavan, R., Richards, Z., Reboleira, A. S. P. S., Rohde, M. M., Fernández, D. S., Schmidt, S. I., van der Heyde, M., Weaver, L., White, N. E., Zagmajster, M., Hogg, I., Ruhi, A., Gagnon, M. M., Allentoft, M. E., and Reinecke, R.: Groundwater is a hidden global keystone ecosystem, Glob. Change Biol., 30, e17066, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17066, 2024.
Sanz, D., Calera, A., Castaño, S., and Gómez-Alday, J. J.: Knowledge, participation and transparency in groundwater management, Water Policy, 18, 111–125, https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2015.024, 2016.
Sanz, D., Vos, J., Rambags, F., Hoogesteger, J., Cassiraga, E., and Gómez-Alday, J. J.: The social construction and consequences of groundwater modelling: insight from the Mancha Oriental aquifer, Spain, International Journal of Water Resources Development, 35, 808–829, https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2018.1495619, 2019.
Schneider, F., Giger, M., Harari, N., Moser, S., Oberlack, C., Providoli, I., Schmid, L., Tribaldos, T., and Zimmermann, A.: Transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge and sustainability transformations: Three generic mechanisms of impact generation, Environ. Sci. Pol., 102, 26–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.017, 2019.
Schurr, C. and Weichhart, P.: From Margin to Center? Theoretische Aufbrüche in der Geographie seit Kiel 1969, Geogr. Helv., 75, 53–67, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-75-53-2020, 2020.
Söller, L., Luetkemeier, R., Müller Schmied, H., and Döll, P.: Groundwater Stress in Europe – Assessing Uncertainties in Future Groundwater Discharge Alterations Due to Water Abstractions and Climate Change, Frontiers in Water, 6, 1448625, https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2024.1448625, 2024b.
Srivastwa, A. K. and Kabra, A.: Socio-spatial Infrastructures: Drinking Water Supply and Formation of Unequal Socio-technological Relations in Rural Southern Bihar, Ecol. Econ. Soc., 6, 205–236, https://doi.org/10.37773/ees.v6i2.990, 2023.
Star, S. L.: This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept, Sci. Technol. Hum. Val., 35, 601–617, https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624, 2010.
Swyngedouw, E.: Modernity and Hybridity: Nature, Regeneracionismo, and the Production of the Spanish Waterscape, 1890–1930, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 89, 443–465, https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00157, 1999.
ter Horst, R., Alba, R., Vos, J., Rusca, M., Godinez-Madrigal, J., Babel, L. V., Veldwisch, G. J., Venot, J.-P., Bonté, B., Walker, D. W., and Krueger, T.: Making a case for power-sensitive water modelling: a literature review, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4157–4186, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4157-2024, 2024.
van Houtum, H., Kramsch, O., and Zierhofer, W.: Prologue. B/ordering space, in: Bordering space, edited by: van Houtum, H., Aldershot u.a.: Ashgate, 1–15, https://hdl.handle.net/2066/46360 (last access: 9 May 2025), 2005.
Verran, H.: Engagements between disparate knowledge traditions: Toward doing difference generatively and in good faith, in: Contested ecologies: Dialogues in the south on nature and knowledge, edited by: Green, L., HSRC Press, Cape Town, 141–161, 2013.
Walter, C.: Digital Technologies for the Future of the Water Sector? Examining the Discourse on Digital Water, Geoforum, 148, 103918, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103918, 2024.
York, A. M., Sullivan, A., and Bausch, J. C.: Cross-scale interactions of socio-hydrological subsystems: examining the frontier of common pool resource governance in Arizona, Environ. Res. Lett., 14, 125019, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab51be, 2019.
Zeitoun, M., Mirumachi, N., Warner, J., Kirkegaard, M., and Cascão, A.: Analysis for water conflict transformation, Water Int., 45, 365–384, https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2019.1607479, 2020.
Zurba, M.: Boundary work as a concept and practice in human geography, Journal of Cultural Geography, 39, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1080/08873631.2021.2011684, 2022.
Zwarteveen, M., Kuper, M., Olmos-Herrera, C., Dajani, M., Kemerink-Seyoum, J., Frances, C., Beckett, L., Lu, F., Kulkarni, S., Kulkarni, H., Aslekar, U., Börjeson, L., Verzijl, A., Dominguez Guzmán, C., Oré, M. T., Leonardelli, I., Bossenbroek, L., Ftouhi, H., Chitata, T., Hartani, T., Saidani, A., Johnson, M., Peterson, A., Bhat, S., Bhopal, S., Kadiri, Z., Deshmukh, R., Joshi, D., Komakech, H., Joseph, K., Mlimbila, E., and de Bont, C.: Transformations to groundwater sustainability: from individuals and pumps to communities and aquifers, Curr. Opin. Env. Sust., 49, 88–97, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.03.004, 2021.
Zwarteveen, M., Domínguez-Guzmán, C., Kuper, M., Saidani, A., Kemerink-Seyoum, J., Cleaver, F., Kulkarni, H., Bossenbroek, L., Ftouhi, H., Verzijl, A., Aslekar, U., Kadiri, Z., Chitata, T., Leonardelli, I., Kulkarni, S., and Bhat, S.: Caring for Groundwater: How Care Can Expand and Transform Groundwater Governance, Int. J. Commons, 18, 384–396, https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1350, 2024.
Short summary
Groundwater is key to the survival of people and ecosystems. Due to global change impacts, conflicts around groundwater thrive and knowledge gaps exist. In the assessment of five case studies we find that groundwater research is in tension between the rapid production of knowledge to solve existential crises and the slow production of knowledge to challenge injustices. Geographic research that combines different perspectives can play an important role in addressing this tension.
Groundwater is key to the survival of people and ecosystems. Due to global change impacts,...
