Articles | Volume 72, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-72-465-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-72-465-2017
Standard article
 | 
15 Dec 2017
Standard article |  | 15 Dec 2017

Forest transitions: a new conceptual scheme

Christian A. Kull

Related authors

Book review: Biodiversités en partage. Reconfigurations de ruralités dans le corridor forestier betsileo tanàla (Madagascar)
Christian Kull
Geogr. Helv., 71, 369–372, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-369-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-369-2016, 2016

Related subject area

Human Geography
The contested environmental futures of the Dolomites: a political ecology of mountains
Andrea Zinzani
Geogr. Helv., 78, 295–307, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-295-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-295-2023, 2023
Short summary
Unruly waters: exploring the embodied dimension of an urban flood in Bangkok through materiality, affect and emotions
Leonie Tuitjer
Geogr. Helv., 78, 281–290, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-281-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-281-2023, 2023
Short summary
Landscape and its possible “new” relevance: ethics and some forgotten narratives on human mobility
Stefania Bonfiglioli
Geogr. Helv., 78, 267–280, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-267-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-267-2023, 2023
Short summary
Framing REDD+: political ecology, actor–network theory (ANT), and the making of forest carbon markets
Juliane Miriam Schumacher
Geogr. Helv., 78, 255–265, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-255-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-255-2023, 2023
Short summary
Production of knowledge on climate change perception – actors, approaches, and dimensions
Anika Zorn, Susann Schäfer, and Sophie Tzschabran
Geogr. Helv., 78, 241–253, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-241-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-241-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Barbier, E. B., Burgess, J. C., and Grainger, A.: The forest transition: towards a more comprehensive theoretical framework, Land Use Policy, 27, 98–107, 2010.
Barbier, E. B., Delacote, P., and Wolfersberger, J.: The economic analysis of the forest transition: a review, J. Forest Econom., 27, 10–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2017.02.003, 2017.
Carruthers, J., Robin, L., Hattingh, J. P., Kull, C. A., Rangan, H., and van Wilgen, B. W.: A native at home and abroad: the history, politics, ethics and aesthetics of Acacia, Divers. Distrib., 17, 810–821, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00779.x, 2011.
Chazdon, R. L., Brancalion, P. H. S., Laestadius, L., Bennett-Curry, A., Buckingham, K., Kumar, C., Moll-Rocek, J., Guimarães Vieira, I. C., and Wilson, S. J.: When is a forest a forest? Forest concepts and definitions in the era of forest and landscape restoration, Ambio, 45, 538–550, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0772-y, 2016.
Cochard, R., Ngo, D. T., Waeber, P. O., and Kull, C. A.: Extent and causes of forest cover changes in Vietnam's provinces 1993-2013: a review and analysis of official data, Environ. Rev., 25, 199–217, https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2016-0050, 2017.
Download
Short summary
The concept forest transition refers to a pattern in which historical deforestation is replaced by forest regrowth. The concept normally points to economic, social, and political causes. This paper proposes a new analytical model that focuses attention on four interrelated processes: changes in tree cover; changes in forest quality; change in the ecological, socio-economic, and political processes that create particular forests; and changes in the way we think about and categorize forests.