Articles | Volume 79, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-35-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-35-2024
Standard article
 | 
05 Feb 2024
Standard article |  | 05 Feb 2024

Making space for community energy: landed property as barrier and enabler of community wind projects

Robert Wade and David Rudolph

Related authors

Social tipping dynamics in the energy system
Floor Alkemade, Bart de Bruin, Amira El-Feiaz, Francesco Pasimeni, Leila Niamir, and Robert Wade
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 485–500, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-485-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-485-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Human Geography
“We learn Latin, they learn to cook”: students', principals', and teachers' coproductions of exclusive public secondary schools
Carlotta Reh and Sara Landolt
Geogr. Helv., 79, 343–356, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-343-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-343-2024, 2024
Short summary
Oral history in geographischer Forschung: Emotionen und Verlust in Erfahrungsgeschichten ehemaliger Werftarbeiter:innen erforschen
Nora Mariella Küttel
Geogr. Helv., 79, 325–339, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-325-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-325-2024, 2024
Short summary
Breakdowns, (Un-)Sichtbarkeiten und glitches. Kritische Geographien der Resilienz digitaler Infrastrukturen
Boris Michel and Finn Dammann
Geogr. Helv., 79, 311–323, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-311-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-311-2024, 2024
Short summary
Suspended in time? Peripheralised and “left behind” places in Germany
Jeroen Royer and Tim Leibert
Geogr. Helv., 79, 221–237, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-221-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-221-2024, 2024
Short summary
Schutz- und Sorgepraktiken: Wie LSBT-Organisationen in Deutschland Safer Spaces für ihre Arbeit mit queeren Asylbewerber:innen und Geflüchteten adaptieren
Lotte J. Hiller
Geogr. Helv., 79, 205–220, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-205-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-205-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Agterbosch, S., Vermeulen, W., and Glasbergen, P.: Implementation of wind energy in the Netherlands: the importance of the social–institutional setting, Energy Policy, 32, 2049–2066, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00180-0, 2004. 
Alonso Serna, L.: Harvesting the Wind: The Political Ecology of Wind Energy in the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, Oaxaca, University of Manchester, Manchester, https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/harvesting-the-wind-the-political-ecology-of-wind-energy (last access: 31 January 2024), 2020. 
Alonso Serna, L.: Land grabbing or value grabbing? Land rent and wind energy in the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, Oaxaca, Compet. Change, 26, 487–503, https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294211018966, 2022. 
Andreucci, D., García-Lamarca, M., Wedekind, J., and Swyngedouw, E.: “Value Grabbing”: A Political Ecology of Rent, Capital. Nat. Social., 28, 28–47, https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2016.1278027, 2017. 
Aquatera: A comparison of the financial benefits arising from private and community owned wind farms, https://communityenergyscotland.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Financial-comparison-of-private-and-community-wind-farms (last access: 31 January 2024), 2021. 
Download
Short summary
Renewable energy technologies require land. Landowners therefore often play a crucial role in wind energy development, shaping participation opportunities of various groups. Through case studies of the Netherlands and Scotland, we unpack how landownership influences the possible strategies for community energy. We find that securing community ownership of the land or wind resource itself is a potentially powerful, long-term strategy for community energy movements to achieve their goals.