Articles | Volume 72, issue 3
Geogr. Helv., 72, 341–350, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-72-341-2017

Special issue: Policy mobilities

Geogr. Helv., 72, 341–350, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-72-341-2017
Standard article
31 Jul 2017
Standard article | 31 Jul 2017

The role of organizational culture in policy mobilities – the case of South Korean climate change adaptation policies

Susann Schäfer

Related authors

Preface: Policy mobilities – geographical perspectives on policies on the move
Susann Schäfer
Geogr. Helv., 77, 267–270, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-267-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-267-2022, 2022
Praxeologische Feldforschung – Reichweite, Tragweite, Importanz und Relevanz als Analysekategorien
Klaus Geiselhart, Simon Runkel, Susann Schäfer, and Benedikt Schmid
Geogr. Helv., 76, 51–63, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-51-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-51-2021, 2021

Related subject area

Human Geography
Family and space – an interpretive perspective on two central concepts in population geography
Giulia Montanari and Tino Schlinzig
Geogr. Helv., 77, 255–262, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-255-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-255-2022, 2022
Short summary
Das tansanische Reisfeld als lebendes Labor? Eigenlogiken des Übersetzungsprozesses einer technologiezentrierten Pilotstudie in ein Agrarentwicklungsprojekt
Astrid Matejcek
Geogr. Helv., 77, 239–252, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-239-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-239-2022, 2022
Short summary
Mistranslating refuge crops: analyzing policy mobilities in the context of Indian Bt cotton production
Katharina Najork and Markus Keck
Geogr. Helv., 77, 213–230, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-213-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-213-2022, 2022
Short summary
Kritisches Kartieren als reflexive Praxis qualitativer Forschung
Boris Michel
Geogr. Helv., 77, 153–163, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-153-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-153-2022, 2022
Short summary
“It makes the buzz” – putting the demographic dividend under scrutiny
Michael Hilbig, Elke Loichinger, and Bernhard Köppen
Geogr. Helv., 77, 141–151, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-141-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-141-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Aboubcar, M.: Emerging donors and knowledge sharing for development: the case of Korea, Yonsei J. Int. Stud., 5, 225–238, 2013.
Adger, W. N., Lorenzoni, I., and O'Brien, K. (Eds.): Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values, governance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2009.
Albrecht, M.: The role of translation loops in policy mutation processes: State designated Bioenergy Regions in Germany, Environ. Plann. C, 0, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16669354, 2016.
Benson, D. and Jordan, A.: What have we learned from policy transfer research? Dolowitz and Marsh revisited, Political Studies Review, 9, 366–378, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00240.x, 2011.
Bongaerts, G.: Soziale Praxis und Verhalten. Überlegungen zum Practice Turn in Social Theory, Z. Soziol., 36, 246–260, 2007.
Download
Short summary
This paper deals with climate change adaptation policy in South Korea. It shows that the implementation of the idea "adapting to climate change" has been highly influenced by the political structure and perception of how to deal with a problem that is highly uncertain. The implications of the research are that the implementation of a political agenda across different political systems requires not only exchange of information but also guidance for institutional adjustments.
Special issue