Articles | Volume 76, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-437-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-437-2021
Standard article
 | 
17 Nov 2021
Standard article |  | 17 Nov 2021

Detention Centers als vernetzte Räume des Einschlusses? Eine gouvernementalitätstheoretische Perspektiverweiterung am Beispiel Lesvos

Tobias Breuckmann

Related authors

Too little to live, too much to die: governing asylum seekers on the brink of death in Moria, Lesvos
Tobias Breuckmann
Geogr. Helv., 80, 191–202, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-80-191-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-80-191-2025, 2025
Short summary

Related subject area

Human Geography
Too little to live, too much to die: governing asylum seekers on the brink of death in Moria, Lesvos
Tobias Breuckmann
Geogr. Helv., 80, 191–202, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-80-191-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-80-191-2025, 2025
Short summary
Who can “slow down” in the neoliberal academy? Reflections on the politics of time as an early-career feminist geographer in Switzerland
Zali Fung
Geogr. Helv., 80, 163–172, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-80-163-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-80-163-2025, 2025
Short summary
Das Töten von Tieren in der Stadt: Eine historische Diskursanalyse
Annette Voigt and Swantje Kalthoff
Geogr. Helv., 80, 145–162, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-80-145-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-80-145-2025, 2025
Short summary
Groundwater urgencies: what can geography offer?
Fanny Frick-Trzebitzky, Robert Luetkemeier, Iordanka Guenova Dountcheva-Robles, David Sanz, Dženeta Hodžić, David Kuhn, Amit Kumar Srivastwa, Christina Walter, Linda Söller, and Jakob Kramer
Geogr. Helv., 80, 135–144, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-80-135-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-80-135-2025, 2025
Short summary
Studying state violence through an embodied approach: methodological reflections
Devran Koray Öcal
Geogr. Helv., 80, 123–134, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-80-123-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-80-123-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Agamben, G.: Homo sacer – Die souveräne Macht und das nackte Leben, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 2002. 
Alford, C. F.: What would it matter if everything Foucault said about prison were wrong? Discipline and Punish after twenty years, Theor. Soc., 29, 125–146, 2000. 
Altin, R. und Minca, C.: The ambivalent camp. Mobility and excess in quasi-carceral Italian asylum seekers hospitality centre, in: Carceral Mobilities, Interrogating Movement in Incarceration, Herausgeber*innen: Peters, K. und Turner, J., Routledge, New York, 30–43, 2017. 
Bosworth, M.: Subjectivity and identity in detention: Punishment and society in a global age, Theor. Criminol., 16, 123–140, 2012. 
Breuckmann, T.: Physische Barrieren als Elemente der Ordnung und Regierung von Geflüchteten. Ansätze einer geogouvernementalistischen Mobilitätsforschung am Beispiel Lesvos, in: Praktiken der (Im-)Mobilisierung. Lager, Sammelunterkünfte und Ankerzentren im Kontext von Asylregimen, Herausgeber*innen: Devlin, J., Evers, T., and Goebel, S., transcript, Bielefeld, 73–94, 2021. 
Download
Short summary
The article analyses the role of detention centres within refugee camps. Why is it important for the functioning of the refugee camp? How is the detention centre linked to other elements within and outside of the camp through certain practices? The former refugee camp of Moria serves as an example. It turns out that mostly asylum seekers with low recognition rates are detained in order to prevent the provision of information and help from outside in order to make a negative decision more likely.
Share