Articles | Volume 78, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-157-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-157-2023
Standard article
 | 
17 Mar 2023
Standard article |  | 17 Mar 2023

Friedrich Ratzel, géographie et sciences sociales en France (1890–1918) – Centralité et distanciations

Marie-Claire Robic

Related subject area

Human Geography
The contested environmental futures of the Dolomites: a political ecology of mountains
Andrea Zinzani
Geogr. Helv., 78, 295–307, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-295-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-295-2023, 2023
Short summary
Unruly waters: exploring the embodied dimension of an urban flood in Bangkok through materiality, affect and emotions
Leonie Tuitjer
Geogr. Helv., 78, 281–290, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-281-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-281-2023, 2023
Short summary
Landscape and its possible “new” relevance: ethics and some forgotten narratives on human mobility
Stefania Bonfiglioli
Geogr. Helv., 78, 267–280, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-267-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-267-2023, 2023
Short summary
Framing REDD+: political ecology, actor–network theory (ANT), and the making of forest carbon markets
Juliane Miriam Schumacher
Geogr. Helv., 78, 255–265, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-255-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-255-2023, 2023
Short summary
Production of knowledge on climate change perception – actors, approaches, and dimensions
Anika Zorn, Susann Schäfer, and Sophie Tzschabran
Geogr. Helv., 78, 241–253, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-241-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-241-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Anon. : Avis au lecteur, Ann. Géogr., 1, I–VII, 1891. 
Anon. : Préface, L'Année sociologique, 1897, I–VIII, 1898. 
Auerbach, B. : Cours de géographie. Leçon d’ouverture, Annales de l’Est, 2, 44–66, 1888. 
Auerbach, B. : Dr W. Götz. Die Verkehrswege im Dienste des Welthandels, Revue de Géographie, 25, 139–151, 1889. 
Auerbach, B. : L'évolution des conceptions et de la méthode en géographie, Journal des Savants, 309–320, 1908. 
Download
Short summary
At the end of XIXth century, French authors shared a posture that mixed admiration and criticism toward German science. Reference to Ratzel was used both for structuring human geography and feeding a struggle between geographers and other social scientists. Divergences with Ratzel’s work deepened during the war and lead geographers to revisit his key notion, Raum, by giving it a pragmatic sense in the light of pangermanism and interpreting it not as mere expanse but as a process of enlargement.