Articles | Volume 79, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-161-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-161-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Book review
| 
28 May 2024
Book review |
| 28 May 2024
| 28 May 2024
Book Review: Weltbildwechsel: Ideengeschichten geographischen Denkens und Handelns
Geographisches Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Schweiz
Ute Wardenga
Institut für Länderkunde, Leipzig, Deutschland
Julia Verne
Geographisches Institut, Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland
Boris Michel
Institut für Geowissenschaften und Geographie, Martin Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Deutschland
Francis Harvey
Institut für Länderkunde, Leipzig, Deutschland
Antje Schlottmann
Institut für Humangeographie, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland
Jeannine Wintzer
Geographisches Institut, Universität Bern, Bern, Schweiz
Related authors
Eberhard Rothfuß, Mirka Dickel, Ute Wardenga, Ulf Strohmayer, Pascal Goeke, Peter Dirksmeier, Matthew Hannah, Paloma Puente Lozano, and Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 79, 119–147, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-119-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-119-2024, 2024
Benedikt Korf and Nadine Marquardt
Geogr. Helv., 79, 15–19, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-15-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-15-2024, 2024
Benedikt Korf, Eberhard Rothfuß, and Ute Wardenga
Geogr. Helv., 79, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-1-2024, 2024
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 78, 325–336, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-325-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-325-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, I approach German Theory as a conjunctive geography: as something that could, but did not take place. I explore the reasons why there is no German Theory (yet) by tracing the Foucault reception in German language geography and the German humanities. I study why these two variants of a
German Foucaulthave not traveled to Anglophone geography. Finally, I speculate what could have happened had the German Foucault traveled to Anglophone geography.
Benedikt Korf, Julia Verne, Jürgen Oßenbrügge, Matthew Hannah, Georg Glasze, and Annika Mattissek
Geogr. Helv., 77, 433–442, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-433-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-433-2022, 2022
Benedikt Korf, Eberhard Rothfuß, and Wolf-Dietrich Sahr
Geogr. Helv., 77, 85–96, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-85-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-85-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In diesem Editorial begründen wir die intellektuelle Agenda, die dem Themenheft «German Theory» zugrunde liegt. Um diese mit anglophonen, aber auch anderen (frankophonen, lusophonen) Theoriediskussionen ins Gespräch zu bringen, möchten wir aus der deutschsprachigen Geistesgeschichte entstandene Denkstile bewusster, autonomer, aber auch dialogischer in den Blick nehmen, in internationale Theoriedebatten einbringen, und so für eine Pluralität von Denkstilen werben.
Benedikt Korf and Ute Wardenga
Geogr. Helv., 76, 381–384, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-381-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-381-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this editorial, we introduce the special section on the politics of memory of
Kiel 1969, the famous German geographers' conference, in which, as the myth narrates, a revolution took place within the discipline of German-language geography. We introduce the three individual statements by Verne, Strohmayer and Weichhart, who all recount their entanglements with the myth of
Kiel 1969, and place them in a wider context of the history of geography.
Benedikt Korf, Maxie Bernhard, Tim Fässler, Meret Oehen, Nicola Siegrist, Livia Zeller, and Gary Seitz
Geogr. Helv., 76, 177–191, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-177-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-177-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper studies a student movement that opened up spaces for radical geography at the geography department of the University of Zurich in the early 1980s, where these students demanded a new curriculum. Building on archival material and narrative interviews, this paper documents the "thought style" of these student initiatives and illustrates the antagonistic political mood, in which these initiatives operated. This case thereby shows the precariousness of radical theory in geography.
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 74, 193–204, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-74-193-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-74-193-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This paper critically examines critical geography’s moralizing high ground. The paper makes this critique through a detour via the analyse of the critical gesture of the Greek cynics that the philosophers Foucault and Sloterdijk take to be a political practice of provocative truth-telling: For Foucault and Sloterdijk, the cynics are anti-dogmatic, anti-theoretical and anti-scholastic. I will argue, however, that the cynic is in danger of speaking from the moral high ground of an anti-critique.
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 73, 177–186, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-177-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-177-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
I critically interrogate the usefulness of the terminology of „post-secularism“ to understand the entanglement of religion and politics in multi-religious societies in the West and elsewhere. I suggest that the vocabulary of a descriptive political theology is better suited to study these dynamics and apply this conceptual vocabulary to analyse political-normative debates on Indian secularism and the everyday struggles of religious actors in the violent politics of Sri Lanka's civil war.
Benedikt Korf and Julia Verne
Geogr. Helv., 71, 365–368, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-365-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-365-2016, 2016
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 71, 215–216, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-215-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-215-2016, 2016
B. Korf
Geogr. Helv., 68, 73–75, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-73-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-73-2013, 2013
B. Korf
Geogr. Helv., 67, 227–228, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-67-227-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-67-227-2012, 2012
Francis Harvey, Yves Annanias, Daniel Wiegriffe, and Christofer Meinecke
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 8, 10, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-8-10-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-8-10-2024, 2024
Boris Michel and Finn Dammann
Geogr. Helv., 79, 311–323, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-311-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-311-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Critical geographers in recent years became interested incidents of failure, disruption and glitches in digital technologies. While we sympathize with the basic assumptions of this discussion this paper proposes an opposing perspective. Using the example of Internet infrastructures, we focus on the work of preventing glitches and maintanance. We are particularly interested in the production of resilience the rationalities of redundancy and addressing latency.
Francis Harvey and Eric Losang
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 7, 56, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-7-56-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-7-56-2024, 2024
Frederieke Westerheide and Boris Michel
Geogr. Helv., 79, 191–204, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-191-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-191-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The governance of urban drug use and its economies has played an important role in the production and control of public space in numerous cities of the global North since the 1970s. Using the example of Görlitzer Park in Berlin's Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg district, this paper argues for a spatially sensitive perspective on the spatializing practices of urban drug policies.
Eberhard Rothfuß, Mirka Dickel, Ute Wardenga, Ulf Strohmayer, Pascal Goeke, Peter Dirksmeier, Matthew Hannah, Paloma Puente Lozano, and Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 79, 119–147, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-119-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-119-2024, 2024
Benedikt Korf and Nadine Marquardt
Geogr. Helv., 79, 15–19, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-15-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-15-2024, 2024
Benedikt Korf, Eberhard Rothfuß, and Ute Wardenga
Geogr. Helv., 79, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-1-2024, 2024
Serena Coetzee, Silvana P. Camboim, Amy L. Griffin, Petr Kubicek, Francis Harvey, and Franz-Josef Behr
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 6, 39, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-6-39-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-6-39-2023, 2023
Francis Harvey
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 6, 86, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-6-86-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-6-86-2023, 2023
Francis Harvey, Marta Kuzma, Izabela Gołębiowska, and Paulina Wacławik
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 6, 87, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-6-87-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-6-87-2023, 2023
Francis Harvey, Eric Losang, and Jonathan Gescher
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 6, 88, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-6-88-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-6-88-2023, 2023
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 78, 325–336, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-325-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-325-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, I approach German Theory as a conjunctive geography: as something that could, but did not take place. I explore the reasons why there is no German Theory (yet) by tracing the Foucault reception in German language geography and the German humanities. I study why these two variants of a
German Foucaulthave not traveled to Anglophone geography. Finally, I speculate what could have happened had the German Foucault traveled to Anglophone geography.
Mathias Siedhoff, Birgit Glorius, and Jeannine Wintzer
Geogr. Helv., 78, 199–205, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-199-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-199-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The authors of this editorial call for a more consistent opening of population geography in epistemological, methodological and theoretical respects. They want to point out possibilities of connection to debates that have already found a firm place in other fields of human geography. At the same time, it is a concern to emphasize the necessity of continuously subjecting the discussion of the phenomenon of population to critical scrutiny, both within (human) geography and outside of it.
Benedikt Korf, Julia Verne, Jürgen Oßenbrügge, Matthew Hannah, Georg Glasze, and Annika Mattissek
Geogr. Helv., 77, 433–442, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-433-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-433-2022, 2022
Kristine Beurskens, Frank Meyer, and Francis Harvey
Geogr. Helv., 77, 317–322, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-317-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-317-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Population geography shows a marked trend towards the increased relevance of qualitative research methods. The article discusses how the visualisation of qualitative research in particular has the potential to provide impulses for progressive developments of both theoretical and methodological dimensions of population geography research. The opportunities call for systematic exploration and exchange on qualitative visualisation and on the conditions for its further development.
Boris Michel
Geogr. Helv., 77, 153–163, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-153-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-153-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Qualitative research in geography and visual geographies have an ambivalent relationship with maps. Reasons for this are manifold. Based on current discussions in geography and beyond, this article explores and systematizes practices of critical mapping in order to explore new connections between visual approaches of qualitative geographies and maps.
Benedikt Korf, Eberhard Rothfuß, and Wolf-Dietrich Sahr
Geogr. Helv., 77, 85–96, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-85-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-85-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In diesem Editorial begründen wir die intellektuelle Agenda, die dem Themenheft «German Theory» zugrunde liegt. Um diese mit anglophonen, aber auch anderen (frankophonen, lusophonen) Theoriediskussionen ins Gespräch zu bringen, möchten wir aus der deutschsprachigen Geistesgeschichte entstandene Denkstile bewusster, autonomer, aber auch dialogischer in den Blick nehmen, in internationale Theoriedebatten einbringen, und so für eine Pluralität von Denkstilen werben.
Serena Coetzee, Amy L. Griffin, Barend Köbben, Petr Kubicek, Francis Harvey, Silvana P. Camboim, Franz-Josef Behr, Reese Plews, Harold Moellering, and Terje Midtbø
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 3, 54, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-3-54-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-3-54-2021, 2021
Ihor Doroshenko and Francis Harvey
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 3, 71, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-3-71-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-3-71-2021, 2021
Amy L. Griffin, Serena Coetzee, Petr Kubicek, Silvana P. Camboim, Francis Harvey, Franz-Josef Behr, and Jan Brus
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 3, 96, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-3-96-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-3-96-2021, 2021
Benedikt Korf and Ute Wardenga
Geogr. Helv., 76, 381–384, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-381-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-381-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this editorial, we introduce the special section on the politics of memory of
Kiel 1969, the famous German geographers' conference, in which, as the myth narrates, a revolution took place within the discipline of German-language geography. We introduce the three individual statements by Verne, Strohmayer and Weichhart, who all recount their entanglements with the myth of
Kiel 1969, and place them in a wider context of the history of geography.
Ute Wardenga
Geogr. Helv., 76, 299–303, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-299-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-299-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
By means of hermeneutic source criticism, my paper investigates how the events of “Kiel 1969” gave rise to a myth. It concludes that the congress’s participants experienced “Kiel 1969” as the site of an enormously dense social interaction within their science. Most importantly, participants’ suggestive oral reports in the aftermath of the congress turned it into the “myth of Kiel”, which became an essential driving force of German-speaking geography’s modernization.
Benedikt Korf, Maxie Bernhard, Tim Fässler, Meret Oehen, Nicola Siegrist, Livia Zeller, and Gary Seitz
Geogr. Helv., 76, 177–191, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-177-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-177-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper studies a student movement that opened up spaces for radical geography at the geography department of the University of Zurich in the early 1980s, where these students demanded a new curriculum. Building on archival material and narrative interviews, this paper documents the "thought style" of these student initiatives and illustrates the antagonistic political mood, in which these initiatives operated. This case thereby shows the precariousness of radical theory in geography.
Julia Verne
Geogr. Helv., 76, 159–161, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-159-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-159-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Kiel 1969bietet einen Einstieg, um über die spezifisch deutschsprachige Entwicklung des Faches nachzudenken und wissenschaftliche Dynamiken in gesellschaftliche Kontexte einzubetten.
Kiel 1969zeigt, wie spannend und vielschichtig die Geographie ist, und die Debatte darum zeigt, wieviel wir nicht wissen, wie einfach wir es uns manchmal machen und wieviel es noch zu entdecken gibt. Aus meiner Perspektive ist
Kiel 1969wichtig, aber eben nicht nur
Kiel 1969!
I. Kaczmarek, A. Iwaniak, A. Świetlicka, M. Piwowarczyk, and F. Harvey
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., VI-4-W2-2020, 95–102, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-VI-4-W2-2020-95-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-VI-4-W2-2020-95-2020, 2020
Robert Pütz and Antje Schlottmann
Geogr. Helv., 75, 93–106, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-75-93-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-75-93-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Based on qualitative fieldwork we analyse the struggles that enfold around the predicted extinction of a herd of wild horses in the Namib Desert. Our investigation shows that the conflictual border work around questions of whether and with what means humans should intervene appears also as an incorporated practice of subjects. Thus, we suggest repositioning research and nature conservation practice towards learning about, and with, the lived bodies of all actors involved.
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 74, 193–204, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-74-193-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-74-193-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This paper critically examines critical geography’s moralizing high ground. The paper makes this critique through a detour via the analyse of the critical gesture of the Greek cynics that the philosophers Foucault and Sloterdijk take to be a political practice of provocative truth-telling: For Foucault and Sloterdijk, the cynics are anti-dogmatic, anti-theoretical and anti-scholastic. I will argue, however, that the cynic is in danger of speaking from the moral high ground of an anti-critique.
Boris Michel and Katharina Paulus
Geogr. Helv., 73, 301–307, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-301-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-301-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This editorial provides a theoretical and contextual framework for the themed issue
Raum. Gesetze. Daten.. The article calls for a broader historiographic analysis of the quantitative-theoretical turn in German-speaking geography. We propose a research agenda that aims at writing a history of science beyond monumental history and classical intellectual history, that focuses on the messiness of history and takes the historicity of systems of thought into account. The endeavour is part of a growing
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 73, 177–186, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-177-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-177-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
I critically interrogate the usefulness of the terminology of „post-secularism“ to understand the entanglement of religion and politics in multi-religious societies in the West and elsewhere. I suggest that the vocabulary of a descriptive political theology is better suited to study these dynamics and apply this conceptual vocabulary to analyse political-normative debates on Indian secularism and the everyday struggles of religious actors in the violent politics of Sri Lanka's civil war.
Boris Michel
Geogr. Helv., 72, 377–387, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-72-377-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-72-377-2017, 2017
Anne Vogelpohl and Jeannine Wintzer
Geogr. Helv., 72, 211–216, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-72-211-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-72-211-2017, 2017
Julia Verne
Geogr. Helv., 72, 85–92, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-72-85-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-72-85-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This article urges us to rethink our engagement with
politically problematicfigures in our own discipline. Focusing on Friedrich Ratzel, it illustrates the contemporary, though widely unnoticed, (re)appearance of Ratzel’s ideas, and uses this example to emphasise the need for more critical reflection concerning the history of our discipline as well as the complex ways in which political ideologies and intellectual reasoning relate to each other.
Benedikt Korf and Julia Verne
Geogr. Helv., 71, 365–368, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-365-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-365-2016, 2016
Boris Michel
Geogr. Helv., 71, 303–317, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-303-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-303-2016, 2016
Benedikt Korf
Geogr. Helv., 71, 215–216, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-215-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-215-2016, 2016
B. Michel
Geogr. Helv., 69, 193–202, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-69-193-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-69-193-2014, 2014
Relational denken, Ungleichheiten reflektieren – Bourdieus Theorie der Praxis in der deutschsprachigen Geographischen Entwicklungsforschung
V. Deffner, C. Haferburg, P. Sakdapolrak, M. Eichholz, B. Etzold, and B. Michel
Geogr. Helv., 69, 3–6, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-69-3-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-69-3-2014, 2014
U. Wardenga
Geogr. Helv., 68, 27–35, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-27-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-27-2013, 2013
B. Korf
Geogr. Helv., 68, 73–75, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-73-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-73-2013, 2013
B. Korf
Geogr. Helv., 67, 227–228, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-67-227-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-67-227-2012, 2012
Cited articles
Abend, P.: Die Karte als Aktionsraum. Digitale Weltbilder zwischen Logo-, Ethnologie- und Egozentrismus, in: Expended Senses. Neue Sinnlichkeit und Sinnesarbeit in der Spätmoderne, Herausgeber:innen: Kracke, B. und Ries, M., Transcript, Bielefeld, 195–219, ISBN 978-3837633627, 2015.
Agnew, J.: Of canons and fanons, Dialog. Hum. Geogr., 2, 321–323, 2012.
Agnew, J.: By words alone shall we know: Is the history of ideas enough to understand the world to which our concepts refer?, Dialo. Hum. Geogr., 4, 311–319, 2014.
Barack, D. L. and Krakauwer, J. W.: Two views on the cognitive brain, Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 22, 359–371, 2021.
Cosgrove, D.: Apollo's Eye. A Cartographic Genealogy of the Earth in the Western Imagination, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, ISBN 978-0801864919, 2001.
Daston, L. and Galison, P.: Objectivity, 5th Edn., Zone Books, New York, ISBN 978-1890951795, 2021.
D'Ignazio, C. and Klein, L.: Data Feminism, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, ISBN 978-0262044004, 2020.
Drucker, J.: Graphesis: Visual Forms of Knowledge Production, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, ISBN 9780674724938, 2014.
Edney, M.: Cartography. The ideal and its history, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ISBN 978-0226605685, 2019.
Elden, S.: The Birth of Territory, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ISBN 978-0226202570, 2013.
Elden, S.: Necessary, but not sufficient: Geography, territory and the history of ideas, Dialog. Hum. Geogr., 4, 320–323, 2014.
Farish, M.: Battling shadows, Dialog. Hum. Geogr., 4, 324–326, 2014.
Glasze, G.: Kritische Kartographie, Geogr. Z., 97, 181–191, 2009.
Harley, J. B.: Historical geography and the cartographic illusion, J. Hist. Geogr., 15, 80–91, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-7488(89)80066-0, 1989.
Harvey, F. and Wardenga, U.: Richard Hartshorne's adaptation of Alfred Hettner's system of geography, J. Hist. Geogr., 32, 422–440, 2006.
Herb, G. H., Häkli, J., Corson, M. W., Mellow, N., Cobarrubias, S., and Casas-Cortes, M.: Intervention: Mapping is critical, Polit. Geogr., 28, 332–342, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.09.005, 2009.
Keighren, I. M., Abrahamsson, C., and della Dora, V.: On canonical geographies, Dialog. Hum. Geogr., 2, 296–312, https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820612468534, 2012.
Kingsbury, P. and Jones, J. P.: Walter Benjamin's Dionysian Adventures on Google Earth, Geoforum, 40, 502–513, 2009.
Klinke, I.: Life, Earth, Colony. Friedrich Ratzel's Necropolitical Geography, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, ISBN 978-0472056170, 2023.
Korf, B. und Marquardt, N.: Kiel 1969–2019: Die Zukunft der Geographie liegt auch in ihrer Vergangenheit, Geogr. Helv., 79, 15–19, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-15-2024, 2024.
Korf, B. und Wardenga, U.: Kiel 1969: Ein Erinnerungsort der Geographie, Geogr. Helv., 76, 381–384, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-76-381-2021, 2021.
Lichtenberg, G. C.: Lichtenbergs Werke in einem Band. Ausgewählt und eingeleitet von Hans Friederici, Heft F (1774–1779), Aufbau-Verlag, Berlin, ISBN 978-3763214044, 1982.
Lizardo, O., Sepulvado, B., Stoltz, D. S., and Taylor, M. A.: What can cognitive neuroscience do for cultural sociology?, Am. J. Cult. Sociol., 8, 3–28, 2020.
Lovejoy, A.: Reflections on the History of Ideas, J. Hist. Ideas, 1, 3–23, 1940.
Michel, B.: Making Mount Kilimanjaro German: Nation building and heroic masculinity in the colonial geographies of Hans Meyer, T. Inst. Brit. Geogr., 44, 493–508, https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12283, 2019.
Michel, B. und Paulus, K.: Produktionen von Sichtbarkeit, Andeutung und Abwesenheit: Geographinnen in Deutschland vor 1960, Geogr. Z., 108, 125–147, https://doi.org/10.25162/gz-2019-0019, 2020.
Monmonier, M.: How to lie with Maps, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ISBN 978-0226435923, 1991.
Palsky, G.: La Sémiologie graphique de Jacques Bertin a cinquante ans!, Visionscarto, https://www.visionscarto.net/la-semiologie-graphique-a-50-ans (letzter Zugriff: 16. April 2024), 2017.
Powell, R.: Notes on a geographical canon? Measures, models and scholarly enterprises, J. Hist. Geogr., 49, 2–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHG.2015.04.011, 2015.
Proctor, R.: Agnotology: A Missing Term to Describe the Cultural Production of Ignorance (and Its Study), in: Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance, edited by: Proctor, R. and Schiebinger, L. L., Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1–35, ISBN 978-0804759014, 2008.
Roberts, S.: What do we want our words and our concepts to do?, Dialog. Hum. Geogr., 4, 331–334, 2014.
Schader Stiftung: Versäumte Bilder, https://www.schader-stiftung.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Handflyer_Versaeumte_Bilder.pdf (letzter Zugriff: 6. April 2024), 2024.
Schaefer, F. K.: Exceptionalism in Geography: A Methodological Examination, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 43, 226–249, 1953.
Schlottmann, A.: Rekonstruktion von alltäglichen Raumkonstruktionen – eine Schnittstelle von Sozialgeographie und Geschichtswissenschaft? , in: Ortsgespräche. Raum und Kommunikation im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert, Herausgeber:innen: Geppert, A. T., Jensen, U., und Weinhold, J., transcript, Bielefeld, 107–136, ISBN 978-3899423129, 2005.
Schürmann, E.: Vorstellen und Darstellen – Szenen einer medienanthropologischen Theorie des Geistes, Fink, Paderborn, ISBN 978-3770563371, 2018.
Stengers, I.: Another science is possible, Polity Press, Cambridge, ISBN 978-1509521814, 2018.
Sultana, F.: By whose worlds shall we know and to what end? Genealogies and its Others in geography, Dialog. Hum. Geogr., 4, 335–338, 2014.
Wardenga, U.: Geschichtsschreibung in der Geographie, Geogr. Rundschau, 47, 523–525, 1995.
Wardenga, U.: Vergangene Zukünfte – oder: Die Verhandlung neuer Möglichkeitsräume, Geogr. Z., 108, 4–22, https://doi.org/10.25162/gz-2019-0009, 2020.
Werlen, B: Sozialgeographie alltäglicher Regionalisierungen, in: Band 1: Zur Ontologie von Gesellschaft und Raum, Franz Steiner, Stuttgart, ISBN 978-3-515-07618-0, 1999.
